Skip to comments.
Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^
| 02-14-2008
| AP
Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813
WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.
This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.
The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: montag813
This is not exactly news. I believe the Russians in the past tested this using their Almaz manned military space station.
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Wont this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.? Depends on when and where they hit it. If they wait until the satellite is low enough that it's beginning to contact the atmosphere, then most of the little pieces resulting from a missile strike will burn up pretty quickly.
22
posted on
02/14/2008 9:22:42 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: rhombus
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!
To: saganite
We were just PO’d because it was China.
To: dangerdoc
Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?
25
posted on
02/14/2008 9:23:17 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Wont this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?
Note that they are waiting for USA-193 to come down very low, below the operational height of most if not all low earth orbit satellites. When they try to destroy it then, presumably the debris cloud will remain low and decay relatively quickly... not to say some debris might be ejected into a higher orbit for a while, but hopefully they'll control the collision/destruction in such a way to minimize this.
26
posted on
02/14/2008 9:23:33 AM PST
by
plsvn
To: theDentist
I’m surprised we haven’t sub-contracted this work out TO the Chinese.........
To: RayChuang88
Did you see the Nova show on that recently? Wild stuff.
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
-—I can’t help but have the horrible feeling it may be for “environmental” reasons—like “green” bullets-—
29
posted on
02/14/2008 9:24:50 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: YouGoTexasGirl
30
posted on
02/14/2008 9:25:20 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: montag813
Coverup.
Alien’s have taken over the device and were planning a covert insertion. good thing it was discovered.
That’s why the government secretly funds concept SCI-FI movies from obscure screewriters. We have stories that lay-out a scenario, it is made into a move (AVP) and then if it really happens, nobody believes it. ingenious.
31
posted on
02/14/2008 9:26:20 AM PST
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: MeanWestTexan
And that said, who cares?
Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong. /s/
32
posted on
02/14/2008 9:27:21 AM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
>Cool
When normal people
shoot up an old TV set,
you have a few beers
and make it game.
The Feds should let the Navy
make it a contest,
let two task forces
try to shoot down the space junk,
winner gets shore leave . . .
To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!There are going to be more and more business opportunities for getting rid of space junk. The most interesting sounding idea I've heard (not really a new one) is to electromagnetically push it away from one's vehicle/satellite. Sort of like an electromagnetic bumper. Although I'm not an expert, or well versed in the feasibility of this.
34
posted on
02/14/2008 9:29:24 AM PST
by
squidly
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
The resulting cloud of debris will be in the same decaying orbit as the original satellite. (Less a few bits and pieces that might get enough kinetic energy to move into a higher orbit.) The mess will burn up in the atmosphere. The Chinese blew up a satellite that was in a higher, more stable orbit. Their debris is also in that higher, more stable orbit.
35
posted on
02/14/2008 9:29:41 AM PST
by
Redcloak
("A plague o' both your houses!")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?
USA-193's inclination is 58.5 degrees so isn't "that" polar. The most northerly it gets is Hudson Bay, central Siberia. South end of the orbit gets a far south as the southern tip of South America.
36
posted on
02/14/2008 9:30:07 AM PST
by
plsvn
To: saganite
Functioning satellites in that orbit has one particular purpose.
37
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:13 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: montag813
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the options will not be publicly discussed until a later Pentagon briefing.
can't anybody keep their mouths shut ?
To: Tulsa Ramjet
Or - the Russians or Chinese have been able to hack into the software. I’m surprised these satellites don’t have a self-destruct device.
39
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:23 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: montag813
Check.
This is the Standard Missile variant developed by the Navy to create a sea-based theater anti-ballistic capability for the Missile Defense Agency. It has been successfully tested a number of times.
Shooting down the satellite should be a piece of cake given its size.
40
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:32 AM PST
by
Captain Rhino
( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson