Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs bill giving $300-$1,200 tax rebates
The Houston Chronicle ^ | Feb. 13, 2008, 2:53PM | DEB RIECHMANN and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

Posted on 02/13/2008 2:53:59 PM PST by BradtotheBone

WASHINGTON — President Bush signed legislation today to send $300 to $1,200 rebate checks to millions of Americans as a "booster shot" for the economy.

Rebates are to go out beginning in May to taxpayers and low-income people, including seniors living off of Social Security and veterans who depend on disability checks. Businesses would get tax breaks for investing in new plants and equipment.

"I know a lot of Americans are concerned about our economic future," Bush said. "Our overall economy has grown for six straight years, but that growth has clearly slowed."

Several dozen members of Congress, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, stood on the stage behind Bush as he signed a bill to fend off a possible recession. He said the stimulus package was achieved after he talked with leaders of Congress in January about "whether or not we could come together to provide a booster shot for our economy — a package that is robust, temporary, and puts money back into the hands of American workers and businesses."

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples from the Internal Revenue Service, with an additional $300 per child. People earning at least $3,000 and those who owe little or no taxes would get $300 for singles, $600 for couples. Those making more than $75,000 and couples with income exceeding $150,000 are to get smaller rebates — $50 less per $1,000 they make over those thresholds.

"Americans struggling with the high cost of energy, groceries and health care will soon receive relief, and our economy will get a timely, targeted, and temporary boost — thanks to our bipartisan stimulus package," Pelosi said. "This package gets money into the hands of Americans struggling to make ends meet, helps families with children, cuts taxes for small businesses that will create new jobs and stimulates our slowing economy."

Economic analysts generally believe the $168 billion package Bush signed will help prevent the current downturn from ballooning into a crisis. But if the rebates don't spur a consumer spending spree strong enough to cure what ails the economy, Congress is ready to throw more money at the problem. Bush said the measure was "large enough to have an impact."

Democrats and Republicans who put aside deep differences to craft the plan and rush it to enactment joined the president at the White House for the signing ceremony in the East Room. The package is designed in part to inoculate lawmakers from voter blame should the economy continue to lag as the November elections bear down.

Congressional leaders already are considering more economic rescue measures that could include transportation spending, unemployment aid and measures to address the housing crunch that's at the root of the current economic doldrums.

In the meantime, economists are debating how effective the rebates will be, with critics arguing that debt-burdened consumers will use the money to pay bills rather than spending the checks and spurring growth.

An Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that only 19 percent of those surveyed said they planned to spend their rebate checks. Forty-five percent said they would pay bills, while 32 percent said they planned to invest the money.

The last time the government sent out rebates, in 2003, recipients spent a little less than a third in the first six months, and about two-thirds within the first year, according to findings by the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers, cited by congressional tax analysts. After rebates were sent out in 2001, just 22 percent said they would mostly spend them — rather than saving the money or using it to pay off debt — and only one-third of the rebate was spent in the short run, according to the same study.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; bush; economy; stimulus; taxrebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2008 2:54:02 PM PST by BradtotheBone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

What a waste of resources. What a fraud.


2 posted on 02/13/2008 2:56:05 PM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

May?

Too little too late.


3 posted on 02/13/2008 2:56:05 PM PST by Petronski (Confutatis novus ordum: Nominatis asinus, flammis acribus addictis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Great, fire up the printing presses, it’s party time!


4 posted on 02/13/2008 2:56:24 PM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Last gasp effort by an ineffectual president to try to boost his ratings. Ditto an inept Congress.


5 posted on 02/13/2008 2:56:37 PM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

More compassionate conservatism ... oh, joy. Not that I don’t want my tax dollars, I just wish that they would not take them in the first place.


6 posted on 02/13/2008 2:56:46 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't do anything you wouldn't want to explain to the paramedics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

I wonder if they ever consider reduction in spending??? Then they could afford this political pandering form of socialism. What a crock.


7 posted on 02/13/2008 2:57:09 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
I'll take it, but their definition of rebate is incorrect:

People earning at least $3,000 and those who owe little or no taxes would get $300 for singles, $600 for couples.

A rebate is an amount paid by way of reduction, return, or refund on what has already been paid or contributed.

And btw, I've heard many, that are expecting this "rebate", are planning on saving it, not spending it, as am I.
8 posted on 02/13/2008 2:57:28 PM PST by Lucky9teen (I'm voting my conscience - I'm writing in Duncan Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

The middle class comes up short again. A couple making, not bring home, 150K gets to pay .


9 posted on 02/13/2008 2:58:33 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

I’m taking mine to the horse track. What the hell.


10 posted on 02/13/2008 2:59:01 PM PST by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
And btw, I've heard many, that are expecting this "rebate", are planning on saving it, not spending it, as am I.

If I buy anything with it, it will be a gun. Somehow that seems appropriate.

11 posted on 02/13/2008 2:59:31 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

I believe it’s based on 2007 Adjusted Gross Income...


12 posted on 02/13/2008 3:00:19 PM PST by Lucky9teen (I'm voting my conscience - I'm writing in Duncan Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Well, I’m screwed. Not married, and make over 75K a year.
Oh well, enjoy the fruits of my labor USA!! I’ll just keep working hard to help bailout housing flippers and people who spend more than they make. What a country.


13 posted on 02/13/2008 3:00:34 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

It’s still not right. It ought to be a tax adjustment and the more you made the more would be returned.


14 posted on 02/13/2008 3:04:22 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Buying your way out of debt. Bill is just a pay off to political contributors.


15 posted on 02/13/2008 3:05:35 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

I’m in the same boat. I’m just trying to figure out why those who pay little or no taxes get a “rebate” and I do not.


16 posted on 02/13/2008 3:05:53 PM PST by SaveTheChief (Chief Illiniwek (1926-2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief

Buy can goods or save it:’)


17 posted on 02/13/2008 3:07:04 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Wealth redistribution.


18 posted on 02/13/2008 3:08:53 PM PST by CJ Wolf (To Join or leave the offical Ron Paul 'let freedom' Ping, Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Maybe we should all buy guns.


19 posted on 02/13/2008 3:09:24 PM PST by CJ Wolf (To Join or leave the offical Ron Paul 'let freedom' Ping, Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples from the Internal Revenue Service, with an additional $300 per child. People earning at least $3,000 and those who owe little or no taxes would get $300 for singles, $600 for couples. Those making more than $75,000 and couples with income exceeding $150,000 are to get smaller rebates — $50 less per $1,000 they make over those thresholds.

Socialism, don't you love it? Folks making $3000 dollars? They don't pay taxes. So how can you "rebate" what they never paid? And notice where that comes from - those who pay the MOST taxes don't get anything back, or get a sliding scale of reduced rebates.

GW is a Socialist too... While I stand to get a little back, I would rather just a real tax cut.

20 posted on 02/13/2008 3:10:28 PM PST by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson