Anyone want to talk me out of it? Have at it.
1 posted on
02/11/2008 7:13:32 AM PST by
WL-law
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: WL-law
Go for it. Just don’t stay on the dark side come the real game......
To: WL-law
Obama is worse than Clinton. There is no Clinton cult.
To: WL-law
Is VA an Open Primary?.......Making Hillary spend more money is a worthy cause........
4 posted on
02/11/2008 7:16:38 AM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: WL-law
That’s interesting. I’m thinking of doing the same thing in Texas in about 3 weeks.
To: WL-law
I agree with your actions.
Step # 1: Eliminate the Clintons and Obama is the guy to do it. I can’t see Hillary as VP and neither will Obama offer it to her.
Obama is more socialist but probably less diabolically evil than Hillary.
With Obama as president, we will have a resurgent conservative congress and Senate in 2010 and then Romney in the White House in 2012.
This the best scenario at this stage in my opinion.
7 posted on
02/11/2008 7:17:19 AM PST by
Maneesh
To: WL-law
I agree with your actions.
Step # 1: Eliminate the Clintons and Obama is the guy to do it. I can’t see Hillary as VP and neither will Obama offer it to her.
Obama is more socialist but probably less diabolically evil than Hillary.
With Obama as president, we will have a resurgent conservative congress and Senate in 2010 and then Romney in the White House in 2012.
This the best scenario at this stage in my opinion.
8 posted on
02/11/2008 7:17:23 AM PST by
Maneesh
To: WL-law
Please vote for Hillary. She is the only beatable Democrat.
9 posted on
02/11/2008 7:17:27 AM PST by
montag813
To: WL-law
You need to vote for Hillary. Obama has charisma, and this is the American Idol generation. If he gets the nom, we have trouble.
10 posted on
02/11/2008 7:18:39 AM PST by
Technocrat
(Romney-Thompson 2008)
To: WL-law
“as George Bush 41 would say, “not gonna do it”.
Unfortunately, 41 did do it, relative to taxes that is.
11 posted on
02/11/2008 7:18:49 AM PST by
Bruinator
("It's the Media Stupid.")
To: WL-law
It will be better to oppose a Liberal Democrat than a Liberal Republican. At least Obama won’t destroy conservatism within the Republican Party.
Go with G-d.
12 posted on
02/11/2008 7:19:05 AM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(I'd rather oppose a Liberal Democrat than a Liberal Republican!)
To: WL-law
Conservatives leading once again in Civil Rights, getting the First Black President elected, against the Hillary "Bull Conner"-"Robert Byrd" Democrats & "John MeCain" Republicans!
To: WL-law
You might as well. The democrats are going to win this one anyway.
14 posted on
02/11/2008 7:19:17 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Just a maverick opposed to King John)
To: WL-law
MANY Republicans in Texas are thinking about voting for Obama.
To: WL-law
Wait a minute.
Osama Obama is way way more dangerous the Hillary.
The guy is a radical leftist way beyond the Clintons
He wants to pull out of Iraqi NOW and let the UN run our foreign policy .
The lib media is now openly campaigning for him.
Vote against Obama .
Clinton we can BEAT Easily.
17 posted on
02/11/2008 7:20:30 AM PST by
ncalburt
To: WL-law
If Obama is the nominee, he will be the next President.
To: WL-law
The one you vote for could end up winning it all, and not be what you ever, ever wanted or expected. Never jump into an idiot’s argument or it could end up being your fault.
19 posted on
02/11/2008 7:21:26 AM PST by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: WL-law
I know a lot of people who are considering this same thing, including myself. If our primary is pretty much wrapped up, there is something twisted about handing a defeat to Hillary. It would also finally put an end to the hippie generation’s chances of a presidency. Now, this is only the primary, once we get to the general, we have to keep Obama out.
On the other hand, Hillary may be easier to defeat.
20 posted on
02/11/2008 7:22:10 AM PST by
mnehring
(Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
To: WL-law
I’m thinking of doing the same when the primaries come to Pennsylvania. Clinton has her cronies in place and has an ax to grind, plus I despise the clintons more than osama/obama.
21 posted on
02/11/2008 7:22:10 AM PST by
stevio
((NRA))
To: WL-law
I’ve thought about this too....
Vote for Obama? Tempting - how often do we get to vote against Hillary Clinton?
But after more consideration, I’m going to vote for Romney.
24 posted on
02/11/2008 7:23:09 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: WL-law
Hillary is more likely to lose the general. Obama is more likely to make a disastrous foreign policy mistake. Hillary will pick a 61 year old feminist for the Supreme Court, while Obama will pick a smart liberal 48 year old. (Sorry for the oxymoron.) We’d be stuck with Obama’s justice a lot longer!
Hill would always anger conservatives, and will get less radical stuff passed. Obama might really wreck the country a lot more!
Don’t do it!!!!!!!!!!! :<)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson