To: WL-law
I know a lot of people who are considering this same thing, including myself. If our primary is pretty much wrapped up, there is something twisted about handing a defeat to Hillary. It would also finally put an end to the hippie generation’s chances of a presidency. Now, this is only the primary, once we get to the general, we have to keep Obama out.
On the other hand, Hillary may be easier to defeat.
20 posted on
02/11/2008 7:22:10 AM PST by
mnehring
(Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
To: mnehrling
this is only the primary, once we get to the general, we have to keep Obama out.
If Obama wins the nomination, you won't be able to keep him out. The media are gonna make McCain look like a dusty mummy compared to Obama and the new Camelot.
53 posted on
02/11/2008 7:30:53 AM PST by
visualops
(artlife.us nature wallpapers)
To: mnehrling
It would also finally put an end to the hippie generations chances of a presidency.Not really. Obama is just a younger generation hippie in a nice suit.
83 posted on
02/11/2008 7:38:18 AM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: mnehrling
In our area, Gohmert might be safe, and so might Cornyn, but what about down-ballot - for the state houses, etc.
I will be working some of the early voting, and on March 4. At least, we should not see the numbers of cross-over voters as in the past. I have seen too many dims vote in our primary, so they could vote for locals. They are never very quiet about why they are voting in the R primary instead of the dim.
Last time, I loved it (both D and R tables were right next to each other) when one lady stopped at the D table first, then quietly and politely told them she would never vote D.
302 posted on
02/12/2008 3:59:16 AM PST by
mathluv
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson