[Menehune56]

More instruction from the ruling class.

[raybbr]

The Arizona Senator will never please the talk-radio and Internet voices who now refer to him as "Juan McCain." He shouldn't try. Most Americans agree with him.

Good grief, what a lie! Even the Wall Street Journal has succumbed to liberalism.

[Sybeck1]

So you win California to lose half the red states?

[kjo]

McCain = Dukakis

[kittymyrib]

The WSJ: Fighting for Illegal Employment in the USA

The WSJ has all the credibility of the NYT these days.

[alicewonders]

The American people had better speak up now, or they will lose their voice forever.

Time for another party to take the GOP’s place.

[Tennessee Nana]

he needs to become more restrictionist on immigration for the general election
________________________________________________

BWAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Redbob]

Tell you what I saw in the Journal one day last week:
side-by-side editorials, one talking about how dumb it was to expect a fence to discourage illegal immigration - right next to it was a story about how incredibly successful the Israeli fence around the Palestinian terrorists has been in reducing terrorist attacks in Israel.

[Redbob]

The Wall Street Journal is all about getting cheap maids and gardeners...

[G.Mason]

Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ... Illegal immigration good ... racist Americans bad ...

Hey Mom! What did you put in my water?

[Archon of the East]

I am amazed at how many supposed American’s favor breaking the rule of law. Let me be perfectly clear on my position, I am pro LEGAL immigration. The key is LEGAL which easier to control. The stupidity of anyone who desires an open border to all is mind numbing Why anyone especially the WSJ would promote a position that would gratnt amnesty to law breakers is beyond my comprehension.

[Pietro]

"More instruction from the ruling class."

Just in case the rubes out in fly over country don't get it. Or as Bill Krstol said; "What are they going to do; vote for Hillary?"

[drpix]

"saying he needs to become more restrictionist on immigration for the general election"

WHAT CRAP!

How is stopping ILLEGAL entries restrictionist on IMMIGRATION?

By this logic/lie stopping SMUGGLING is restrictionist on trade.

McCainiac Elitist Propaganda!

[mad_as_he$$]

Yup if you want to see what a McCain presidency will look like look no further than the Governator. WSJ right but as usual for the wrong reason.

[End Times Crusader]

No surprise here. I've been saying all along that Americans favor a pathway to citizenship for illegals and that anti-immigrant extremists were hurting the party's image with their actions and rhetoric. This election is proving that. Both Tancredo and Hunter went nowhere and the one candidate that didn't bow to the fringe is now on his way to the nomination.

We must elect John McCain this November and support sensible immigration reform so that the GOP can secure the Hispanic vote. Anything else and the party is finished.

[puroresu]

LOL! Big business telling us peons what we're allowed to think. I notice they rigged their poll very nicely. They left the most popular option out of the poll. That option is to enforce existing law. If we prohibited illegals from getting jobs or getting benefits, they'd leave of their own accord.

The media have demonized deportation to the point that many people think it's the equivalent of sending people to the death camps. Even so, there's no need for mass deportation. Just enforce the law. But even if we rounded them all up and bussed them out, it would be perfectly legitimate to do so.

I've asked this question a dozen times here and I've never gotten an answer from the open borders types. The question is: Do I have the right to enter any nation on earth anytime I feel like it, without regard to the laws of that nation? If I decide tomorrow that I want to live in Argentina, do I have a right to simply go there with no documentation, to sign up for benefits, to take a job from an Argentinian citizen? Would Argentina be violating my human rights if they booted me out?

The open borders people are afraid to answer that question. And the fact that they're afraid to answer it demonstrates what lying phonies they are.

[amihow]

WSJ is not taking into account the deep distrust and prejudice against Mormons. Further, Huckabee could not garner a lot of votes in liberal California, so McCain was their obvious choice.

Sure does not mean that they approve of his immigration stance.

WSJ is pimping for the elite corporations again. Don’t fall for it.

[NavVet]

I invite the WSJ and the rest of the “we love to exploit desperate poor people for cheap labor crowd” to look at the national polls on amnesty and border enforcement.