As long as you win Texas and FLA, it's not that bad a strategy.
Posted on 02/11/2008 5:45:26 AM PST by Menehune56
Now that John McCain is close to wrapping up the GOP Presidential nod, the same people who endorsed his opponents are saying he needs to become more restrictionist on immigration for the general election. We'd direct readers to last week's California primary exit poll, which offers better advice.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Good grief, what a lie! Even the Wall Street Journal has succumbed to liberalism.
So you win California to lose half the red states?
McCain = Dukakis
The WSJ: Fighting for Illegal Employment in the USA
The WSJ has all the credibility of the NYT these days.
The American people had better speak up now, or they will lose their voice forever.
Time for another party to take the GOP’s place.
Exactly. That arithmetic makes no sense.
If the Dems don’t win this time they otta go out of buiness.
Which ten state is McCain gonna carry besides California, given this perspective?
he needs to become more restrictionist on immigration for the general election
________________________________________________
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAA
Tell you what I saw in the Journal one day last week:
side-by-side editorials, one talking about how dumb it was to expect a fence to discourage illegal immigration - right next to it was a story about how incredibly successful the Israeli fence around the Palestinian terrorists has been in reducing terrorist attacks in Israel.
The big panel uproar by the media talking heads in mid-November will revolve around how they missed the mark on lack of support for Juan by the general votership. Of course, Bill Kristol and Fred Barnes will be back pedaling at high speed.
As long as you win Texas and FLA, it's not that bad a strategy.
The Wall Street Journal is all about getting cheap maids and gardeners...
Hey Mom! What did you put in my water?
I am amazed at how many supposed American’s favor breaking the rule of law. Let me be perfectly clear on my position, I am pro LEGAL immigration. The key is LEGAL which easier to control. The stupidity of anyone who desires an open border to all is mind numbing Why anyone especially the WSJ would promote a position that would gratnt amnesty to law breakers is beyond my comprehension.
>> Time for another party to take the GOP’s place.
More and more, I’m beginning to agree with you. The GOP has turned into Big Government Liberalism. Mark my words — the NEXT plank to go out the window will be “we’re the party of low taxes”. Low taxes simply do NOT fit into the GOP’s “grow the government” plans.
I see this most clearly at the local level. School boards, county governments, municipal government, state government... all working hard to INCREASE the size and influence of government, and to gain and spend an ever larger share of the wealth generated by productive citizens — and around here, they all have an (R) by their name on the ballot.
Consider that the (R)oaches and (R)ats that crawl out into the Washington, DC spotlight breed behind the baseboards of municipal government and in the cupboards of state government.
Problem is, gaining critical mass for a new party is a daunting undertaking.
Just in case the rubes out in fly over country don't get it. Or as Bill Krstol said; "What are they going to do; vote for Hillary?"
Across America, only in the liberal, urban rich cities (which probably have lots of illegals) might "agree with him" but no one else seems to.
This upcoming election seems to be getting down to one party, DemocRAT and a "fringe party RepublocRATS."
Hello Lou Dobbs....
WHAT CRAP!
How is stopping ILLEGAL entries restrictionist on IMMIGRATION?
By this logic/lie stopping SMUGGLING is restrictionist on trade.
McCainiac Elitist Propaganda!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.