Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee Won't Concede Washington State
http://www.komotv.com/news/15491731.html ^ | February 10, 2008 | KOMO News

Posted on 02/10/2008 11:02:51 AM PST by LibertarianLiz

February 10, 2008- Seattle, WashingtonNews

Huckabee won't concede Washington state, cites 'legal issues'

Story Updated: Feb 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM PST
By KOMO Staff & News Services

SEATTLE - Republican Mike Huckabee says he's not ready to concede Washington state, even though the state Republican Party has declared Arizona Sen. John McCain the winner of Saturday's caucuses.

On NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday morning, the former Arkansas governor said his campaign is looking into some legal issues, without going into specifics.

With 87 percent of GOP precincts reporting statewide, McCain leads the GOP field with 25.5 percent of delegates while Huckabee took 23.7 percent - a difference of only 1.8 percent.

State Republicans say the remainder of the caucus votes will not be counted until Monday.

Texas Congressman Ron Paul 20.6 percent of the GOP vote, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won 16.5 percent.

Approximately 12.7 percent of delegates reported their preference as "uncommitted", while another 1.1 percent reported their preference as "other."

The division among Republicans was reflected in their comments at caucuses and a comparatively light turnout, when compared with the Democratic caucuses.

Even in heavily Republican Lewis County, the Republican caucuses at W.F. West High School in Chehalis drew only about 15 people, compared to more than 160 at a Democratic caucus elsewhere in the school.

"McCain is a bit wishy-washy. I'm not sure where he stands from day-to-day," said Maria Easley, a 40-year-old financial analyst from Chehalis, who was reluctantly supporting McCain. "But I don't think that Huckabee can go the distance."

Paul, whose libertarian views and anti-war stance have drawn a strong following in Washington, was running a strong third.

"People are really, really ready to have someone who is a serious conservative, a real conservative," said Maureen Moore, state coordinator for Paul's campaign. "And that's who Ron Paul is."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: anyonebutmccain; huckabee; mccain; wa2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: eclecticEel
It’s interesting that Paul is doing so well, I never suspected that he would get 20% of the vote anywhere.

With it down to McCain and Huckabee, Paul has become the "none of the above" vote.

41 posted on 02/10/2008 1:26:12 PM PST by coramdeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I agree, and this whole Washington State thing stinks bad.


42 posted on 02/10/2008 1:27:13 PM PST by commonguymd (Now What. No real conservative in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: coramdeo

What’s it really come down to is that the “frontrunner” can’t muster more than a quarter of the support of his supposed base.


43 posted on 02/10/2008 1:30:06 PM PST by eclecticEel (oh well, Hunter 2012 anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz; CyberCowboy777; RainMan; Libertina; sionnsar
The WA state caucus results are a sham if they are counting delegates that were "elected" and whom they professed they are going to be for (that they can change at any time between now and the conventions). I say this because out of the ~20 delegates "elected" at my caucus, five+ of them were not even there. They were nominated by husbands or wives and in one or two cases, by neighbors saying "I think so and so would be willing to be a delegate and I think they are for (whomever)". There was one precinct with no one there and no delegates seated!

That is complete crap if this is what is going to be used to decide delegates from this state and could effectively end the Huckabee campaign. It should be what people who attended the caucus said they wanted, not just the handful of volunteers who are willing to go on to the county and state conventions, whom we had no sway over whom they want to support, and who can change their allegiance at any time forward.

44 posted on 02/10/2008 1:32:08 PM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redinIllinois
Huck said the other day that he believes the American people appreciate the civility, and that’s why they are the last two standing. I know I do.

LOL!! The old Huckster sure can tell a joke! Either that or he should listen to his own push-polling and read the fliers his people are circulating.

45 posted on 02/10/2008 1:35:50 PM PST by coramdeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
I agree, and this whole Washington State thing stinks bad.

Welcome to the politics of Washington State. Maybe someone will finally pay attention to all the shenanigans that has been going on here.

46 posted on 02/10/2008 1:37:40 PM PST by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: America-The-Great-1967

The math only works out if nothing changes.

McCain is always good for something stupid.

If it’s meaty enough the MSM will not be able to resist running it 24/7.

It will only take one thing like the bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran thing to derail him. If it comes out soon enough.

But besides that any number of things can change.

This is already the screwiest election I’ve ever heard of.


47 posted on 02/10/2008 1:48:12 PM PST by ScratInTheHat (It's about the illegal’s stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

I think you are missing the point here.

NO votes were cast for presidential delegates.

If you want to make sure your guy gets the delegates at the State Convention (where is matters) get involved and bring votes.

I had 400 people at my caucus, all had a voice. All had opportunity to vote for delegates that represent them.

You cannot blame other if you did not make sure you had the votes to elect delegates that support your guy.


48 posted on 02/10/2008 1:58:27 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Honor those who serve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

It’s not over by a long shot.

Huckabee is right to question the results.

The GOP establishment has for too long gotten its way to the detriment of the conservative movement.


49 posted on 02/10/2008 2:09:07 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

50 posted on 02/10/2008 2:15:57 PM PST by FBD ("I am sure that Senator Clinton would make a good president," ~ John McCain on NBC's "Meet the Press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
At this point I support McCain(yuck) over Huckabee, but bless huck for fighting. Your right that the GOP cannot just steam roll with an automatic coronation of the candidate. I think the elimination of Romney has already squashed the establishment candidate. I think the vast majority of GOP voters are decidedly right of center. I think they are voting to win in the general and have concluded McCain is the guy. Huckabee should continue, if a miracle happens I will pull the lever for him. If not I will pull the lever for McCain.
51 posted on 02/10/2008 2:16:10 PM PST by America-The-Great-1967 (Don't fix the blame, fix the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: grndragon
Paul is my congressman, I will vote for him to continue to represent Galveston and surrounding areas. I would never vote for him for president, unless he were the alternative to OBAMACLINTON. I have serious heartburn with him not renouncing and distancing himself from the lunatic fringe who believe that Bush knocked down the Twin Towers. I don't think he believes that for a minute, but sometimes you have to have to call out folks who do, even if they support your candidacy.
52 posted on 02/10/2008 2:21:31 PM PST by America-The-Great-1967 (Don't fix the blame, fix the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: America-The-Great-1967

I agree with in a general sense but unlike you I cannot forgive McCain’s wrong absolutely wrong positions on so many fundamental issues that are dear to conservatives: stem cell research/abortion, ANWR, campaign finance, the IRS, on GITMO Huck says: “in fact there are extraordinary means being taken to make sure these detainees are being given really every consideration” as opposed to McCain who has criticized GITMO every step of the way.

I could go on

Huckabee has not been tested at the federal level true - but his word s imply a more conservative approach for the US


53 posted on 02/10/2008 2:33:27 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Well, I’ve actually heard that these turnouts are kind of consistent to what they’ve been in the past. Note, I sad “I’ve heard”, so that means it could be wrong— but don’t panic.


54 posted on 02/10/2008 2:42:52 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
The issue here is not Huckabee’s 23% vote total, but that 74% of the Republican electorate voted against the party’s presumptive nominee, whether they voted for Huckabee, Paul, Romney, or for the uncommitted slate. The same could be said for the results in Kansas and Louisiana, where the anti-McCain vote was 76% and 58%, respectively. Romney and the others are out, and Paul is apparently ending most campaign appearances and spending, trying to hold onto his Congressional seat. Huckabee is the last man standing against the RINO machine. If he can somehow beat McCain in Ohio and Texas, this may become a horse race again.
55 posted on 02/10/2008 2:43:30 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

I think a lot of people are confused about how Washington works. The caucus was held yesterday, but the primary vote isn’t until the 19th of this month. I think the “winner” is determined based on a 50-50 combo of these two results. I’m sure someone posted exactly what happens on another thread.

So, the “republican electorate” hasn’t even voted yet— the people who were able & invested enough to go to caucuses did so (which are mostly more conservative people, thus explaning McCain’s less than stellar showing).


56 posted on 02/10/2008 2:49:16 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

Your are right. It was the way the conservative vote was split, and the fact that blue state primaries came earlier. That and all MSM love that McCain gets. A loss in Texas in particular would be a terrible terrible blow for McCain. A smart politician would give Huckabee the VP nomination, but the famous McCain temperament will not allow it.


57 posted on 02/10/2008 2:56:09 PM PST by Biblebelter (I will NEVER EVER vote for McCain or any other current Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: grndragon
I wouldn't call him a pacifist. He believes in self defense.

Was he for Desert Storm?

58 posted on 02/10/2008 4:20:43 PM PST by Theophilus (Nothing can make Americans safer than to stop aborting them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

Huckabee’s best shot in that interview came when he said why should I get out. The party front loaded the primaries to get a lot of big states and delegates out of the way early. Huckabee is right if California, Illinois, and Florida had not moved up their primaries McCain WOULD NOT be the presumptive nominee that he is today.”

So what. If, If, If. If George Allen hadnt said macaca, Huck would be back in Hope. If Romney had done a mere 3 points better, Romney would be the nominee.
If Huck wasnt in the race, Romney would beat mcCain.


59 posted on 02/10/2008 6:30:09 PM PST by WOSG (Want to blame someone for McCain being the nominee? Blame the Mormon-bashers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: henbane

“Mitt should transfer his 16.5% of voters over to Huck.

Payback for McLame’s transfer of votes to Huck in the West Virginia primary. “

Not at all, since it was Huck who screwed Romney, *HUCK* should pay back Romney and give him his votes.


60 posted on 02/10/2008 6:31:22 PM PST by WOSG (Want to blame someone for McCain being the nominee? Blame the Mormon-bashers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson