Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are there any Freepers who support John McCain?
02/07/2008 | Checkers

Posted on 02/07/2008 6:29:17 PM PST by Checkers

Are there any Freepers who support John McCain?

If you support Mr. McCain, can you make the case for your man?

Can you make the case without bringing up the War?

Can you make the case without bringing up Judges?

Can you make the case without using any ACU ratings? (Those don't impress anybody.)

Can you make the case without insults or telling people to "calm down"?

Can you make the case without the type of lying and dishonesty we've come to expect from John McCain and his special friend Mike Huckabee?

Can you make the case without trashing Barack Obama?

Can you make the case without using Hillary Rodham Clinton as some kind of boogyman or boogyperson?

Can you?

The ball is in your court.


TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bornyesterday; elections; juniorhighdebateteam; mcamnesty; mccain; sithomevanity; spoilsport; yayanothervanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 801-820 next last
To: Jewels1091

You’re in denial about having abuse syndrome from the GOP.

Denial.

A McCain presidency has more potential for harm than does a true Democrat victory.

At least we can openly oppose the Dems, yet with McCain you’ll be coerced into support his policies, the same policies that you’d oppose if Hillary championed them.

Just as now, you’re succumbing to the pressure and putting party over principle.

So how does that feel?


621 posted on 02/08/2008 3:59:44 PM PST by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO cuz I'm too conservative to be a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: unspun

http://www.mikehuckabee.com

All: please, for America’s sake, set the dishonest smear campaigns aside and find out what Mike Huckabee is about.

Then, if so moved, please volunteer and give money.”

I’m glad you’re finally admitting that ManCrush’s campaign was one big dishonest smear campaign.

Has ManCrush received the break-up letter from John, yet?


622 posted on 02/08/2008 4:03:41 PM PST by Checkers ("McCain Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of RINOCO, a division of DNC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

Not as healthy as was Reagan at the same age when he ran.


623 posted on 02/08/2008 4:06:36 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeForever

“You may be right about the point you make, but I agree with Peggy Noonan’s assessment that GWB is personally responsible for the current out-of-favor status of the Republican Party. The length of the Iraq War, the controversial pretense for entering it, as well as other missteps, have slowly chipped away at the credibility of the GOP on Bush’s watch. The public view of Bush is a poor one, as is easily shown by his approval ratings. The GOP will pay the price for that for the next couple of election cycles, at least.”

Peggy needs to get over the fact that W is married and just move on.


624 posted on 02/08/2008 4:08:21 PM PST by Checkers ("McCain Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of RINOCO, a division of DNC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Inflicting Hillary or Obama on America to make a point is too high a price for me.

If that's too high a price to pay today for the return of conservatism, when will a better price be available? I believe McCain would do all he could to ensure the answer is "never".

625 posted on 02/08/2008 4:11:43 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Why the link to ManCrush McEnvy?


626 posted on 02/08/2008 4:19:09 PM PST by Checkers ("McCain Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of RINOCO, a division of DNC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
He is strong on taxes and spending. He has never voted to raise taxes and he has been an unwavering advocate of ending earmarks and cutting spending.

Would not his global-warming proposals impose a massive tax increase?

He is strong on Pro-Life issues. He believes Roe-vs-wade should be repealed and that states should handle the issue themselves.

Didn't he try to silence a pro-life group via McCain-Feingold?

We are also likely to get judges like Roberts and Alito from McCain which is another plus.

Were it not for G14, a lot more judgeships would have gotten filled with conservatives. Instead, many are still vacant.

627 posted on 02/08/2008 4:21:01 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Checkers; cartoonistx
Checkers... in that post you wrote to me, it was was in response to #476. In Post 476 I was responding to cartoonistx, and the remarks I made to him in my post were wrong, I misunderstood what he was trying to say, and I apologized to him and took the blame for that. (# 586 and #610)

In his cartoon, in post #474 I thought he was advocating killing the Republic party (the hole in the elephant's head I thought was a bullet hole) and voting for Hillary. I misunderstood his intent. My remarks in #476 was with that frame of mind.

I see people that claim the will vote Hillary, but they claim to be conservative, I personally cant make sense of that. Even with that, I should not have spoke to him in that tone, cartoonistx, like you is a good guy, a good FReeper, and a Patriot.

If you and I end up voting differently on this issue, I understand we are both doing what be believe is right for this Country and wanting conservatism to inspire this nation again.

628 posted on 02/08/2008 4:23:23 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
Stay at home and a filibuster-proof congress is achievable for the Democrats. That would be interpreted as a mandate ... and they would use their new found political power to ensure they never loose it again.

I'm not staying home. I am going to vote for the down-ticket races and possibly for a third-party Presidential candidate. I'm just not going to vote for McCain. So how does that give Democrats a filibuster-proof Congress?

629 posted on 02/08/2008 4:23:46 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

“Even though I loath John McCain, I will be forced to vote for him. I can’t stand by and watch Hitlery take the White House. Being forced to vote for arrogant person isn’t the same thing as supporting him. It could be some Hillary operatives suggesting that we sit out the election. No way is that going to happen with me. Perhaps the only satisfaction I will get this election season is to see Huckabee get tossed over-board because McCain no longer needs him.”

I am with you. Must vote against Hillary or Obama, so will hold my nose and vote for McCain.


630 posted on 02/08/2008 4:27:45 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: billva

“Maybe I am, the body language of your post led me to an easy conclusion.”

I would be lying if I said it’s easy to choose between a couple of $h!+ sandwiches like Hillary and McCain.

I don’t agree with Obama on 80-90% of the issues, but at least he seems to be honest man with a normal family.

If McCain and company really want to win this election, smearing their opponents, lying and fear tactics are not going to cut it.


631 posted on 02/08/2008 4:34:51 PM PST by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Huh?


632 posted on 02/08/2008 4:37:02 PM PST by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

I will be voting “R” up and down the ballot except for President.

I am undecided for President.


633 posted on 02/08/2008 4:39:34 PM PST by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

Cool.


634 posted on 02/08/2008 4:59:45 PM PST by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

I hear ya.


635 posted on 02/08/2008 5:27:11 PM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
Many FReepers on this thread have offered compelling arguments on both sides of the McCain equation. And I have been thinking about this alot the past 24 hours or so.

I have to agree with you that hoping that dems will screw this country up so badly in 4 to 8 years so the country will be begging for true conservatism is a naive argument. The ramifications of a Hillobama presidency really give me the chills.

What could they do to this country in that short period is not something of which I am willing to experiment. I have my children to think about.

I have resigned myself to the fact that I will be going to the polls in November, clothespin securely fixed on my nose, and will color in the circle for that old, cranky, rat-ba$tard that hates me because the alternative terrifies me too much. I wish it weren’t so.

But I don’t have to like it one whit. *stomps foot*

And I still really miss Fred! *pout*

636 posted on 02/08/2008 5:38:20 PM PST by Shelayne (I'm STILL with Fred until I positively, absolutely have to vote for the guy who hates me. *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Here’s my complaint:

McCain has proffered liberal ideas to satisfy his personal agenda, while masquerading as a Republican.

He did not, and does not, support the President.

He will not get my vote. I’d rather vote for Hillary than McCain. The future of this country will not be enhanced by either. HIllary’s term will more than likely turn America agaisnt her, versus McCain waffling over every decision.

McCVain could possibly last 8 years, and Hillary can’t.


637 posted on 02/08/2008 6:03:00 PM PST by FLCowboy, (Ironically, Gore notes that he has run for president twice and says: "I know what it takes to win.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD

“Imagine if half the people in the U.S belonged to gangs”

They already have about half the people in the Dem controlled inner-cities belonging to gangs and/or committing crimes.

Putting aside the loss of all the good R candidates, we have no choice. Its either McNasty/McNuts or we just “give” the Presidency to ObamamLama or the Hildabeast.

McNasty at-least offers “some” hope. With either of the two Dems there is no hope at all. By the time the Dems finished their four years we’d have liberal judges having been appointed to the Supreme Court and we’d have problems as long as they were there since they can’t be voted-out.

I’m just as unhappy as all of you are. “My guy” was Duncan Hunter, unfortunately he’s long since dropped out. After him I was wishing for Fred Thompson -unfortunately he dropped-out too, then when it got down to McCain, Huckabee, and Romney, I was hoping for Romney...My LAST choice all along was McCain. I don’t have any respect, AT ALL, for him, HOWEVER he’s what we’re stuck with.

That leaves each of us these choices to make: Do we “bite-the-bullet” and vote for him, do we vote for everyone BUT President, or do we vote third-party, wasting our votes on a condidate that has NO CHANCE of winning, or lastly, do we “stay-home”?

Third party doesn’t help us - - Staying home doesn’t help us, voting, but NOT for President doesn’t help us. - - Likely, if we stay home, vote for all but President, or vote third party we’ve given the Presidency to the Dems.

If anyone thinks that the Dems won’t screw-up the country they’ve got another think coming.
They’ll be government waste on a scale that pales with what we have now, there’ll be National-Health-Care, there’ll be liberal policies enacted that’ll “knock your eyes out”, including the expansion of welfare (laziness) programs, amnesty for illegal aliens etc etc.
By the time their four years are up they will have done so much damage and enacted so many Liberal policies that it’ll take YEARS to straighten-it-out, and some of them might never be able to be straightened out/eliminated.

I’m ALREADY HOLDING MY NOSE, and have been since Mitt dropped out, B U T, I refuse to give MY vote to the Dems, in any way, including NOT voting for, AT LEAST “someone” who MAYBE-MIGHT-HOPEFULLY BE “SOMEWHAT” LESS LIBERAL THAN THE DEMS WOULD SURELY BE.

(This post is not meant to be specifically to YOU, rather it’s a call for keeping cool-headed regarding the lousy pick we have, and the hope that those who ignore our candidate realize that the stakes are too high to abandon the Party and allow the Dems to sit in the Oval Office.)


638 posted on 02/08/2008 7:11:29 PM PST by GVNR (We have a choice of no choice, no choice, and no choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; All

Finally found a valid reply to the McCain debate. A person who said he would not vote for him announced “I am a Conservative NOT a Republican”. So no obligation to vote for a Republican!

Logical but still cutting off your nose to spite your face instead of holding that nose shut tight and voting for whomever the Republican nominee is.

Every vote not thus cast is a DOUBLE vote for the DimRats. It takes two to balance out a Dem vote if you do not vote to counter it.


639 posted on 02/08/2008 7:49:52 PM PST by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

I am not voting for McCain. Period.


640 posted on 02/08/2008 8:43:10 PM PST by PeterFinn (A muslim in the White House would be an Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 801-820 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson