To: blam
LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how.
5 posted on
02/06/2008 1:25:55 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Was it Asimov who said that the surest proof that time travel is not possible is the fact that we haven’t been inundated with tourists from the future.
9 posted on
02/06/2008 1:27:10 PM PST by
Borges
To: ShadowAce
LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how.Maybe they're here showing us right now?
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1382&category=Environment
15 posted on
02/06/2008 1:29:35 PM PST by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: ShadowAce
LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how. That would violate the prime directive...uhh...I mean...uhh....nevermind.
17 posted on
02/06/2008 1:29:55 PM PST by
Pete
(That goat is looking at me.)
To: ShadowAce
LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how. Yes. We have been. But you won't pay attention.
18 posted on
02/06/2008 1:29:54 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of all the politics in politics.)
To: ShadowAce
if I had a time machine I would not want anyone to know, humans today are too stupid
63 posted on
02/06/2008 1:45:45 PM PST by
GeronL
(when someone tells you they have a Fair (fill in the blank) Plan, you need to run away holding your)
To: ShadowAce
"LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how."LOL! Very good point!!
91 posted on
02/06/2008 1:55:27 PM PST by
KoRn
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: ShadowAce
That’s a good point that makes my brain hurt.
To: ShadowAce
LOL! If time travel could *ever* be possible, it’d be possible right now—because our future selves would be here showing us how.Exactly! Heck, they wouldn't have to show us . . . they could choose to go back even further and introduce time travel at some point in the remote past, which means that it will have always been possible anyway and . . .
Ow. My head hurts.
I await the appearance of Bill and Ted!
115 posted on
02/06/2008 2:10:15 PM PST by
Zionist Conspirator
("Venatata 'el-ha'aron 'et ha`edut 'asher 'etten 'eleykha.")
To: ShadowAce
Well, from what I understand, the current theory is that you can only go back in time to the point that the time machine was first created.
So, the lack of "time travelers" may be an indication that one has yet to be invented. Or, this "era" has been quarantined.
OTOH, the Vulcan Science Directorate has declared that time travel is impossible.
To: ShadowAce
Well Ive seen the theory before and it goes like this: There are two ends to time travel and both have to be established to do it. By building our end today it can be used as a becon in the future interesting but the physics is *way* over my head..
137 posted on
02/06/2008 2:26:17 PM PST by
N3WBI3
(Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
To: ShadowAce
The point is that if time travel is posible using this technology, they will be showing up when the machine is turned on.
Of course it is just as likely that there is no past or future, only a continiously changing present. You can make a time machine but there is no place to go.
172 posted on
02/06/2008 5:10:09 PM PST by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: ShadowAce; SampleMan; justaguy; Captain Rhino; wolfcreek; GregoTX; Shadow44; JoanVarga
190 posted on
02/07/2008 5:36:48 AM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson