Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Travellers From The Future 'Could Be here In Weeks'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-6-2008 | Roger Highfield

Posted on 02/06/2008 1:23:05 PM PST by blam

Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'

By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 6:01pm GMT 06/02/2008

The first time travellers from the future could materialise on Earth within a few weeks.

Physicists around the world are excitedly awaiting the start up of the £4.65 billion Large Hadron Collider, LHC - the most powerful atom-smasher ever built - which is supposed to shed new light on the particles and forces at work in the cosmos and reproduce conditions that date to near the Big Bang of creation.

1.21 gigawatts of electricity: Michael J Fox and Christopher Lloyd in the De Lorean time machine from Back to the Future

Prof Irina Aref'eva and Dr Igor Volovich, mathematical physicists at the Steklov Mathematical Institute in Moscow believe that the vast experiment at CERN, the European particle physics centre near Geneva in Switzerland, may turn out to be the world's first time machine, reports New Scientist.

The debut in early summer could provide a landmark because travelling into the past is only possible - if it is possible at all - as far back as the point of creation of the first time machine.

That means 2008 could become "Year Zero" for temporal travel, they argue.

Time travel was born when Albert Einstein's colleague, Kurt Gödel, used Einstein's theory of relativity to show that travel into the past was possible.

Ever since he unveiled this idea in 1949, eminent physicists have argued against time travel because it undermines ideas of cause and effect to create paradoxes: a time traveller could go back to kill his grandfather so that he is never born in the first place.

But, sixty years later, there is still no fundamental reason why time travellers cannot put historians out of business.

But the Russians argue that when the energies of the LHC are concentrated into a subatomic particle - a trillionth the size of a mosquito - they can do strange things to the fabric of the universe, which is a blend of space and time that scientists called spacetime.

While Earth's gravity produces gentle distortions in spacetime the LHC energy can distort time so much that it loops back on itself. These loops are known to physicists as "closed timelike curves" and they ought, at least in theory, to allow us to revisit some past moment.

The scheme chimes with one laid out in 1988, when Prof Kip Thorne and colleagues at the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, showed that wormholes, or tunnels through spacetime, would allow time travel, a scheme popularised by Carl Sagan in his novel - made into a film - Contact.

Prof Aref'eva and Dr Volovich believe the LHC could create wormholes and so allow a form of time travel. "We realised that closed timelike curves and wormholes could also be a result of collisions of particles," Prof Aref'eva says.

There are still plenty of obstacles for the likes of Dr Who, however. Not least of them is the fact that these are mini wormholes, so only subatomic particles are small enough to travel through them.

Time travel could be possible ... in the future How the Time Machine works They tell The Daily Telegraph that whether subatomic time travel in the LHC would open the doors for human scale time travellers "is a deep and interesting question" but stress that "these problems, and many others as well, require further investigations."

Probably the best we can hope for is that the LHC may show a signature of the wormholes' existence, Dr Volovich says. If some of the energy from collisions in the LHC goes missing, it could be because the collisions created particles that have travelled into a wormhole and through time.

One sticking point until now for wormhole concepts is finding an exotic kind of material capable of keeping the maw of the wormhole open for time travel.

Dark energy - a mysterious antigravity force that is thought to pervade the universe - could, they say, be just what is needed to keep the entrance to a wormhole open, at least according to one family of ideas about its nature, where it is called phantom energy.

If a blend of colliding particles and phantom energy does create a wormhole in Geneva this year, an advanced civilisation could find it in their history books, pinpoint the moment, and take advantage of their technology to pay us a visit.

"The observational evidence still allows for phantom energy," says Robert Caldwell, a physicist at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. "As for Aref'eva and Volovich's speculation that the LHC will produce the stuff of time machines - ugh!"

A leading scientist who believes that time travel may be possible, Prof David Deutsch of Oxford University, comments: "It's speculative in the extreme, but not cranky. For various reasons I don't think the mechanism they propose would work (i.e. provide a pathway for messages from the future) even if their speculations are true."

Dr Brian Cox of the University of Manchester adds: "The energies of billions of cosmic rays that have been hitting the Earth's atmosphere for five billion years far exceed those we will create at the LHC, so by this logic time travellers should be here already. If these wormholes appear I will personally eat the hat I was given for my first birthday before I received it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: callingartbell; future; greatscott; stringtheory; time; timemachine; timetravel; travellers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last
To: blam

161 posted on 02/06/2008 3:35:49 PM PST by Clock King (Bring the noise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Calling Rod Serling. Paging Rod Serling.


162 posted on 02/06/2008 3:36:52 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
> What was his wife’s name?

Romanadvoratrelundar. She had only one name. Does that mean she had a mono-moniker?.

163 posted on 02/06/2008 3:53:35 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

At the time he was doing the Doctor I don’t think he was married.


164 posted on 02/06/2008 3:56:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I thought I remembered they were. According to Wiki, they were

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Baker

Married in 80, He was the good Dr until 81.


165 posted on 02/06/2008 4:10:12 PM PST by netmilsmom (Giving up "Hairspray" and the cast for Lent. Prayers appreciated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

gnip...


166 posted on 02/06/2008 4:23:18 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Didn’t know that! Thanx ... there’s a video on the web which has a long interview with Tom.


167 posted on 02/06/2008 4:29:50 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC; NicknamedBob; Tax-chick; Dead Corpse; Darksheare

Thanks for the ping....we’re waiting with bated breath.
NOT!

Hiya, Star!


168 posted on 02/06/2008 4:41:33 PM PST by Monkey Face (He who laughs last probably didn't get the joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: blam

I was going to post a reply to this article, but my future self arrived and prevented me from doing so...


169 posted on 02/06/2008 4:47:29 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

LOL! Epic.


170 posted on 02/06/2008 5:04:30 PM PST by Shortwave (Islamo Fascism is NOT America's greatest enemy, our apathy is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Here's an amusing interview where Tom confirms the marriage!
171 posted on 02/06/2008 5:06:45 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

The point is that if time travel is posible using this technology, they will be showing up when the machine is turned on.

Of course it is just as likely that there is no past or future, only a continiously changing present. You can make a time machine but there is no place to go.


172 posted on 02/06/2008 5:10:09 PM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

I already have a time machine.

I set it.. Close my eyes and when I open them it is tomorrow..


173 posted on 02/06/2008 5:17:45 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Baker and Pertwee were far and away the best. As a resident in East Tenn., we do not presently get the Whovian adventures telecast. I must resort to the occasional viewing of Baker and Romana, with cameos by K9, etc. In the several houses I’ve built for myself over the years, I always wanted to include a ‘Police Call Box’ toilet closet. LOL ... never did that, wives object don’tchaknow. Hmm, now I’m single again, perhaps I’ll build just one more ... nothing expansive, just what I’d want for me and two old cats.


174 posted on 02/06/2008 5:18:44 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

haha!! that was brilliant!


175 posted on 02/06/2008 5:20:53 PM PST by ovrtaxt (The GOP is no place for a nice Conservative like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blam

I have been asking people what time is it all day and everyone gives me a different answer. Is that what this is all about?


176 posted on 02/06/2008 5:31:36 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face; StarCMC; NicknamedBob; Tax-chick; Dead Corpse; Darksheare

D’you think maybe we could unload some of the juvenile plesiosaurs on this crowd?


177 posted on 02/06/2008 5:58:42 PM PST by NicknamedBob (John McCain's word processor has Italics ON all the time. Otherwise everything comes out leftward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: blam

O'rely?

178 posted on 02/06/2008 6:04:22 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Bob Dole could beat Juan "Traitor Rat" McAmnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

If they could really control time travel then why wait weeks? why not travel back in time a few weeks after a successful test and say it works?

(this is actually a brain teaser)


179 posted on 02/06/2008 6:07:22 PM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

They’ll probably be hungry.


180 posted on 02/06/2008 6:24:49 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Political zombies need brains, but they hunger only for taxes." ~ NicknamedBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson