Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Republican Voter Suppression in Southern Calilfornia!
News Talk Radio | 02-06-08 | PsyOp

Posted on 02/06/2008 9:01:01 AM PST by PsyOp

Reports are rolling into talk radio stations in San Diego about massive Republican vote suppression.

Thousands of Republican voters in San Diego and as far north as Los Angeles showed up to vote on Tuesday only to be told that they were registered "Non-Partisan". This meant that they could not vote for the Republican Primary candidates.

Non-Partisan (independent) voters in California can vote for Candidates in any other party, including the Democrat party, but are prohibited from voting in the Republican Primary unless they are registered as a Republican.

Rick Roberts [http://www.760kfmb.com] is currently reporting on this and has had hundreds of calls and thousands of e-mails from people who showed up to vote only to be told they were not registered as Republcans. Reports began rolling into the Roger Hedgecock show yesterday.

Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as "Non-Partisan".

The Republican Party in California has begun investigating this issue, but the mainstream media continues to report that Californias election "went smoothly".

It seems clear that someone or some group managed to tamper with the voter registration rolls. Either by direct access to the Registrars computer system, or by gaining access to voter information and then sending in registration cards in their name.

Southern California was projected to go heavily in favor in Mitt Romny.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; california; keatingfive; primary; republican; romney; supertuesday; suppression; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-464 next last
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
I don't think so. The Democrats have a little problem ... they're in the process of seriously pissing off their Black base, suppressing that turnout, when Obama looses to Hillary, in an obviously rigged primary, following up on Bill Clinton's racist comments.

But they have an ace in the hole ... they're in the process of seriously pissing off the conservative base just as much, suppressing that turnout as well, by manipulating the Republican primary so that McCain wins, McCain being a candidate that the real conservative base of the Republican party hates with a passion second only to their hate for Hillary.

The only shoe left to fall ... how the left will manipulate affairs so as to piss off Huckabee's evangelical base too, suppressing their turnout in November as well.

I don't know if politics was this ugly or not in times past. Perhaps it was, and the dirt just didn't make it into my history books. But Clinton politics fell out of the ugly tree, and hit every branch on the way down.

With the Chinese, Russians, Soros, drug lords and Arabs all willing to spend their finest money to influence American politics and politicians, not to mention the huge American interests willing and able to do so (and in some cases needing to, for survival), it's not entirely surprising. Power corrupts. We're talking some serious power here.

401 posted on 02/06/2008 7:26:39 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (The Greens and Reds steal in fear of freedom and capitalism; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
This is one Hollow victory for McCain.

He will be kissing butt for the next nine months in a futile plea for support. Delicious.

I fault Romney on one issue.... in the last debate, he should have taken the gloves off and kicked McCain square in the nuts(figuratively speaking of course). He would have gotten more respect.

402 posted on 02/06/2008 7:35:11 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: redstateconfidential
Can someone post a pic .... a Garden Gnome with McNastys face?

He also reminds me of the guy in Braveheart who sold out William Wallace. A real bag-o-shite.

403 posted on 02/06/2008 7:39:16 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Omigod!!! I experienced voter suppression in IL too!! I went to vote for McCain after work in IL and it took me almost two hours to get home. I almost didn’t get to vote!!! I suspect that Rush and friends must have used their bombastic temper tantrum to conjure up an ice storm.
404 posted on 02/06/2008 8:31:47 PM PST by Accygirl (Mitt Romney: $1 million/ delegate. And you want this guy in control of the federal budget??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #405 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo
This is fact. This exact thing happened to me. I live in South Park in San Diego. My polling place was on Kalima St. Here is my story:

I arrived at the polling place on Kalima St at 7:30am. After waiting in line, while watching an old blind lady unsuccessfully trying to find names on the registration sheet, I got to the table and politely gave my name. Upon giving my name I was told that I was registered as NP. The poll workers adamantly rejected my request to receive a republican ballot and offered me a Democratic one. My request to verify this information was ignored. I rejected the Democratic ballot and drove straight to the registrar’s office.

I had mailed my registration in long before the deadline and registered as a Republican. At the registrar’s office, my information was correct and they gave me a Republican ballot.

I VOTED!!

406 posted on 02/06/2008 11:03:07 PM PST by dieselsynth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

Thank you, PsyOp. Voter fraud is the worst of all problems in a democracy.


407 posted on 02/06/2008 11:42:46 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper
Untrue. They could contest the finding and vote with a provisional ballot. Election laws clearly state this is permissible. The Republicans should have held their ground and demanded their lawful provisional ballots.

Can they still do it?

408 posted on 02/06/2008 11:44:29 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is not limited to SoCal, the Bay Area also had a large number of folks who experienced likewise. I suspect it is a statewide “phenomena”.

I bet Michael Medved won't talk about this on his show.

409 posted on 02/06/2008 11:46:03 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Actually, there is no FEC at the moment. The Dem-controlled senate has refused to confirm any of Bush's appointees to fill the gaps, and there are not enough current members to constitute a quorum.

McCain and the democrats are quite brilliant in their corruption, aren't they?

410 posted on 02/06/2008 11:49:34 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

I worked the polls on election day and the same thing
happened - many Republicans were showing up as Nonpartisan.
As a matter of fact, a couple of Democrats had the same thing
happen.

We allowed them to vote provisional.


411 posted on 02/07/2008 1:41:27 AM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Neither were many aware of the fact, or informed by poll workers, that they could fill out a provisional ballot to correct this problem.

I had to laugh when I read this. Did you hear about the 20 or so voters who were informed by poll workers that the funny pens they were given were special pens? They used magic invisible ink that the counting machines would be able to read. They were stylus left over from the electronic voting machines. Workers were puzzled by a stack of ballots with no votes on them and tracked down the story.

"Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity." Anonymous

412 posted on 02/07/2008 2:19:30 AM PST by athelass (Proud Mom of a Sailor and two Marines! McCain is to conservatism as Hillary is to Playboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

mark


413 posted on 02/07/2008 2:20:51 AM PST by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

My ballot was taken out of the privacy folder and behold the ballot box which is supposed to be in plain view was on the floor under the table, which allowed the worker to view my ballot out of the privacy screen while I would have to bend over to see her putting it in the ballot box. The box has always been out in the open and on a table not under it. I am in a predominantly demorat polling area and everytime they “announce” my party it seems like an insult.


414 posted on 02/07/2008 2:59:57 AM PST by rolling_stone (same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

I would think the poll workers should have informed them they could cast a provisional ballot, since the names were not found in the proper party...

http://law.justia.com/california/codes/elec/14210-14227.html

14217. If the precinct board is unable to find a voter’s name upon
the index of registration, it shall inform the voter that he or she
may cast a provisional ballot and the procedure for doing so. If the
voter elects to cast a provisional ballot, the precinct board shall
furnish the voter with a provisional ballot, in accordance with
Section 14310.

14310. (a) At all elections, a voter claiming to be properly
registered but whose qualification or entitlement to vote cannot be
immediately established upon examination of the index of registration
for the precinct or upon examination of the records on file with the
county elections official, shall be entitled to vote a provisional
ballot as follows:
(1) An election official shall advise the voter of the voter’s
right to cast a provisional ballot........
http://law.justia.com/california/codes/elec/14310-14312.html


415 posted on 02/07/2008 3:06:41 AM PST by rolling_stone (same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
Good Morning Ali,

Un freaking Believable.

I believe this whole election thing is making me ill. I have had a headache for weeks now. I think it’s time to step away and take a break or I will end up in the nut house.

416 posted on 02/07/2008 5:36:57 AM PST by angcat (MITT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
Can they still do it?

Of course. At least until the polls close.

417 posted on 02/07/2008 6:55:35 AM PST by Digital Sniper (Hello, "Undocumented Immigrant." I'm an "Undocumented Border Patrol Agent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Zeon Cowboy

A new law went into effect in January (too late for the Primary this year) that requires the county clerk to notify you in writing of any party affiliation changes.

Which made my friend wonder — did they anticipate this was going to be a problem at some time?


418 posted on 02/07/2008 7:19:57 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

Comment #419 Removed by Moderator

To: PsyOp
Now I understand why the pollster asked if i was republican

...and there are literally millions of illegal alien mexicans voting.

I saw a local abc news story last night that showed the polling places in Cotra Costa county (berkeley) handing out provisional ballots to illegal aliens, they even interviewed this one lady who could not even speak english

420 posted on 02/07/2008 9:28:21 AM PST by KTM rider ( SCOTUS '08 it's more than the oval office this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson