Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fifth Cable Cut, Iran Loses Net Connectivity
Slashdot ^ | 2/06/2008 | CmdrTaco

Posted on 02/06/2008 8:09:13 AM PST by sionnsar

You may have noticed a number of stories recently about undersea cables getting cut around the world. Apparently the total is now up to 5, but the scariest part of this is that Iran is now offline. You can also read Schneier's comments on this coincidence.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coincidence; internet; iran; justacoincidence; telecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: quack

Ok, you win. I won’t insult you like you did me.


101 posted on 02/06/2008 9:56:35 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: quack

>> Iran doesn’t have the capability to do this.This is being done on the ocean floor at a depth of 200 feet,without anyone seeing who is doing it. <<

They don’t have the capacity to dive 200 feet???


102 posted on 02/06/2008 9:57:16 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

BTW,I do work with NUWC with test and developement of underwater systems,how about you?


103 posted on 02/06/2008 9:58:21 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: chs68

Sh! Skippy, no-one’s supposed to know we’re invading Canada.


104 posted on 02/06/2008 9:58:39 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quack

I told you nicely, twice to stop posting to me ass. Go to hell


105 posted on 02/06/2008 10:03:47 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: dangus

This ain’t scuba diving.It’s pitch black,nitrogen narcosis is a great possibility beyond 130ft.They can dive(helmeted dive),but can’t pull this type of stunt off without detection.


106 posted on 02/06/2008 10:06:04 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

I think you’ve got the correct outlook on this.


107 posted on 02/06/2008 10:10:02 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: quack

Well, actually it’s well in the SCUBA range. The record is 1027 feet. 200 feet is a lot closer to 130 feet than it is to 1027 feet. What makes you think that even a helmeted dive would be so easily detected? (Serious inquiry) Do we have monitors or patrol boats along even these cables?


108 posted on 02/06/2008 10:10:53 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

"I think we need a bigger boat."

109 posted on 02/06/2008 10:13:26 AM PST by Jonah Hex ("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm
She’s reading flatline there in Tehran!


110 posted on 02/06/2008 10:14:27 AM PST by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinives
It doesn’t explain all 5 cuts, unless they couldn’t figure out which one went their way and just started cutting at random until they got the desired result

That was my first thought... if at first you don't succeed, try, try, again...

111 posted on 02/06/2008 10:17:23 AM PST by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Because they would have to "dive" from a surface vessel or a specialy equipped sub,in multiple locations,at multiple times, in the Gulf.It's not the diver so much as it is the delivery of the diver.We have ships and subs patrolling those waters, if you remember the Iranian speedboat "incident".The only thing we can't control is the Iranian waters.As in,they can do what they want over there,but it doesn't mean it isn't detected.

Hope that makes sense.

112 posted on 02/06/2008 10:20:13 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; milwguy; RDTF; Allegra

The Internet provides the general population with almost instantaneous information about what is occurring in the world. The Iranian governement may not want it’s people to have that capability if it is planning military action.


113 posted on 02/06/2008 10:22:26 AM PST by B4Ranch (("Life is a food chain; if you're not at the top, you're on the menu." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; RDTF; sionnsar; Bahbah; fanfan

Interesting to say the least...

114 posted on 02/06/2008 10:29:01 AM PST by Allegra (A chicken in every pot and a pair of new socks every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

I will post to you one last time,just to calm you down.I’m just a guy on the internet.Don’t take it personal and certainly don’t let me ruin your day.We had over 46 deaths last night in the south due to tornados.Our posting opinions means nothing compared to that.Have a good day.


115 posted on 02/06/2008 10:32:02 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: quack

>> Because they would have to “dive” from a surface vessel or a specialy equipped sub,in multiple locations,at multiple times, in the Gulf.It’s not the diver so much as it is the delivery of the diver.We have ships and subs patrolling those waters, if you remember the Iranian speedboat “incident”.The only thing we can’t control is the Iranian waters.As in,they can do what they want over there,but it doesn’t mean it isn’t detected. <<

I’m a little confused. Speedboats charging our vessels hardly demonstrates that we see (and log) every boat large enough to carry a diver, so what does that have to do with anything? Are you saying that we can detect every fishing boat in the entire Middle East? Or do we have a special program in place to monitor the several thousand miles of underwater cable in and around the Middle East?


116 posted on 02/06/2008 10:32:19 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Murmansk and a whole lot of other Soviet ports. It sometimes produced some really high quality intel too.


117 posted on 02/06/2008 10:35:34 AM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE
You doubt the Iranians subs can go to 200 feet and take out a cable laying on the bottom?

They're not really designed for it, but we have a Seawolf class sub designed to tap underwater cables.

118 posted on 02/06/2008 10:45:17 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I would say that the area is well covered.Without getting too specific.Too well covered for this happen so many times undetected, by Iran of all countries.


119 posted on 02/06/2008 10:48:54 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Good map.

Thanks.


120 posted on 02/06/2008 10:52:25 AM PST by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson