Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain, Romney acrimony dates back to Olympics
LA Times ^ | 2/3/08 | By Bob Drogin, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Posted on 02/03/2008 10:04:54 AM PST by BurbankKarl

On Sept. 19, 2000, John McCain rose in the Senate to rail against what he called the "staggering" sums that the federal government planned to spend to help Salt Lake City stage the 2002 Winter Olympics.

"The American taxpayer is being shaken down to the tune of nearly a billion and a half dollars," McCain said.

The Arizona Republican vowed to "do everything in my power" to delay or kill "this pork-barrel spending" and to end the "fiscal abuse" related to the Olympics. "This is preposterous and it must stop," he said.

Mitt Romney, who headed the Olympics, counseled calm when reporters from Utah's Deseret Morning News reached him in Sydney, Australia. Romney challenged McCain's arithmetic, arguing that taxpayers would provide only $250 million. In any case, he asserted that he already had obtained backing in Congress.

"I'm expecting the funding we need to host the Games," he said. "I'm quite confident."

The clash over Olympics spending, which dragged on for two years, helps explain some of the acrimony that now characterizes the race between the two front-runners for the Republican presidential nomination. The dispute provided an early preview of the fissures that still divide McCain and Romney as they face what may be decisive contests Tuesday.

"It may be a source of the sniping between the two," said Quin Monson, assistant director of the Center for Elections and Democracy at Romney's alma mater, Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Kelly Patterson, the center's director, agreed: "People have long memories in politics."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mccain; olympics; rino; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Hawthorn

“,...He says Romney is probably the best “businessman” in the USA. Works for me.)”

and it works for me tooo, Hawthorn!!!


81 posted on 02/03/2008 12:59:33 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
“...McCain has been talking the talk about Pentagon reform ...”

No Rumsfeld, was the the one reforming the Pentagon from an antiquated institution to a modern force ready to take on a variety of challenges. He did a great job over the objections of leftover Pentagon officials and aged Senators. When the history is written of this era, it will show new and great capabilities and accomplishments in our modern force due to The Rumsfelt/Bush team.

82 posted on 02/03/2008 1:06:39 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

The acrimony will be higher if Romney is indeed leading McCain in CA


83 posted on 02/03/2008 2:15:18 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
John exhales carbon dioxide and that’s good for plants and trees. So he’s got that goin’ for him.

Carbon Di? I thought that was bad for "the planet". So McCain doesn't even have that going for him.

84 posted on 02/03/2008 4:16:39 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Utah Binger
Sorry my friend, the Olympics were not in trouble. They were gunning for the two original organizers, one of whom is a friend. Reason? Not Mormon Royalty. Plain as that. Those two had pulled off a miracle in just getting the games.

No replies?? Just can't imagine that!

Chirp...chirp....

Photobucket

85 posted on 02/03/2008 4:32:23 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Folks can say whatever they want to say about McCain, and a lot of it is true, but the guy has always been against big spending...

If McCain is so effective a legislator that he can actually create and pass unconstitutional legislation, then why is he unable to do a damn thing about spending?

There is a disconnect here.

86 posted on 02/03/2008 4:46:11 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; colorcountry; Elsie
No replies?? Just can't imagine that!

I know! Dave Johnson only has two problems. He is married to that little blond reporter twerp and he never went out drinking with me.

I can't save him from Kim, but I could have given good advice.

87 posted on 02/03/2008 5:04:51 PM PST by Utah Binger (Nabakov slept here while trying to find the butterfiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Last time I checked, there were FOUR Republicans still running, not two.

Vote accordingly.

88 posted on 02/03/2008 5:06:19 PM PST by BillyBoy (Wasn't the "goal" on FR to STOP Rudy McRomney? Then VOTE HUCKABEE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: squidly
If McCain had accepted parole from the enemy, which is what an early release would have been, he would have violated the Code of Conduct, and likely the UCMJ.

Only the senior ranking prisoner gets to decide who gets released if an early release is offered. Ordinarily the order of release would be based on those with severe injuries first, followed by the more able-bodied on a first-in, first-out basis.

There is little doubt McCain, with his injuries, probably would have qualified. However, it was not McCain's decision. That decision could only be made by the senior ranking prisoner.

McCain was smart about it. He did not directly refuse release. He said he would accept release as long as every Allied POW captured prior to him was released with him.

89 posted on 02/03/2008 8:07:23 PM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

lol


90 posted on 02/03/2008 10:30:22 PM PST by Checkers (I'd say John McCain is a Dick Nixon, but Nixon didn't hate Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: squidly

Being against the Olympics is not going to win McCain any accolades. People LOVE the Olympics and it inspires a lot of young people to pursue excellence in physical achievement. Opposing spending on the Olympics is selfish.


91 posted on 02/03/2008 10:36:29 PM PST by Eva (Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I support Mitt. He has plenty of real world experience. I hope he wins. He is a better man than John McLame. Plus:

Everyone just LOVES him!



92 posted on 02/04/2008 4:44:13 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Opposing spending on the Olympics is selfish.

Ok...



93 posted on 02/04/2008 4:45:57 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: elpadre; Hawthorn

Here’s the video of Cramer talking about Romney:

Cramer actually calls Romney the best businessman in North America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoBKgmnVkrc


94 posted on 02/04/2008 7:53:07 AM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

> Cramer actually calls Romney the best businessman in North America. <

Aha! Now we can be absolutely sure that Cramer has been bribed by Bain Capital — just like Paul Weyrich, James Bopp, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, the Heritage Foundadtion, etc. etc.


95 posted on 02/04/2008 8:07:17 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

LOL.


96 posted on 02/04/2008 8:20:22 AM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

“Cramer actually calls Romney the best businessman in North America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoBKgmnVkrc

excellent - thanks!!!


97 posted on 02/04/2008 10:06:23 AM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: squidly
>>>Folks can say whatever they want to say about McCain, and a lot of it is true, but the guy has always been against big spending, with the exception of military spending.

Whatever. Most of the Federal govt. money for the post 9/11 Olympic games were for anti-terror security. They had sepcial forces in the mountains watching the ski trails. And they had bomb squads all over the place. McCain's biggest brag (even in the debates) about cutting spending is stopping the funding of a 6 billion dollar military destroyer. (Anyone ask Reagen if he would've cut fuinding?). Plus he stood by while Clinton gutted the military. The more I learn about Keating 5 "War hero" McCain the more I realize he is like Murtha and Kerry. All talk and no substance.

98 posted on 02/04/2008 2:19:57 PM PST by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: squidly
>>>but the guy has always been against big spending

Ever heard of the S & L scandal where McCain got caught with his hand in the cookie jar with 4 DEMS. THe govt. shelled out our taxes to the tune of 124.6 Billion. Cutting Spending My Arse

Keating Five From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It came out that these senators had been beneficiaries of $1.3 million (collective total) in campaign contributions from Keating

Savings and Loan Crisis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around USD$160.1 billion, about $124.6 billion of which was directly paid for by the U.S. government

The Lincoln Savings led to the Keating five political scandal, in which five U.S. senators were implicated in an influence-peddling scheme

99 posted on 02/04/2008 2:31:49 PM PST by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom
Every time I say McCain is against big spending, a bunch of folks come out of the woodwork to set me straight. But I expect you could point to any senator and find some spending.

Re: the Clinton military cutbacks, that was about as bipartisan as it gets. There was no significant opposition to the early 90s defense cuts.

100 posted on 02/05/2008 7:36:12 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson