Posted on 02/02/2008 11:15:28 AM PST by TheLion
Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, had 59% of the vote with 3% of the towns holding caucuses reporting. Ron Paul trailed with 19%, John McCain had 18%, and Mike Huckabee and undecided votes each had about 2%.
(Excerpt) Read more at kjct8.com ...
bttt
There was a better option. Now there is no option. BTW, debates are an ill-informed way to learn about a candidate. You need to pay attention to a candidate’s record. I’d think ole Willard was the Second Coming, too, if I only listened to the lies coming out of his mouth. I guess records don’t matter anymore. His rhetoric and promises have never matched his record.
Its cheaper to just blanket call
And they are hoping you will vote for her as a vote against Obama
:)
The Northeast thing is a red herring. RINOs can come from anywhere. Romney would’ve run out of Utah if he had thought that was a better stepping stone to the WH. Problem is, he knew he was too liberal to win the Governorship there. Thank heavens he didn’t win there, he would’ve made Utah a Democrat state in short order.
Don’t get snippy. The only thing I ask of the purists is that they treat McCain and Romney (and Huckabee, for that matter) with equal disdain. There may be a conservative argument against Mitt Romney, but there is absolutely no possible conservative argument in favor of John McCain. If you’re consistently anti-RINO across the board, it’s a principled stand that can’t take issue with.
But that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about the spam-crazy bots who are overwhelming this site and distorting its voice.
Maine update:
Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, had 53 percent of the vote with 12 percent of the towns holding caucuses reporting. Libertarian-leaning Texas Rep. Ron Paul trailed with 21 percent, Arizona Sen. John McCain had 18 percent, and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and undecided votes each had about 2 percent.
——snip——
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1201867281622&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Maybe ole Ricky had a rea$on to $upport him.
*cough*
I'm glad to see that Ron Paul came out ahead of McRino.
Do you really want to do a back and forth ? “No he’s not” “Yes he is.” There’s nothing on earth that can disprove that Romney isn’t worse. Know why ? Arizona still has Conservatives and a Republican party. Show me the ones in MA after Slick Willard got done.
Aww. Cat got your tongue ?
BTTT
I've seen all the candidates records. They all have problems. At least Romney was deep in blue territory. And at least Romney is the only candidate of the four remaining who is running on a conservative platform.
At this point I'll take my chances with Mitt.
I hope he wins Maine.
They support sleazy, lying, First Amendment shredding, amnesty-granting, "gun-show loophole" closing, carbon-capping, envirocultist Arizona leftists?
Those real Tennesseans might want to think this through a little more.
Like I said, there’s no Conservative to vote for. At this point, I’m just here to stop Romney from taking us down in flames. I have no love for McCain. Nada.
Nope.
Hillary or Obama
You’ve got to be kidding, remember, they were both afraid to debate on Fox. Romney is the only one whose shown capable of taking them and their tag team partners Matthews, Russert, Oberman, Blitzer, CNN, ABC, MSNBC.
*snicker*
McCain comes from conservative Arizona yet still acts like the second coming of McGovern. I wonder how he’d do in Utah?
I think the Lord just did a spit-take.
Sorry, Arizona is a red state. There is NO excuse for what McCain has done to conservatism given that his constituents weren'y fire-breathing Mass. commies.
As I said, "no he (Mitt) isn't (worse than McCain)".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.