Do you really want to do a back and forth ? “No he’s not” “Yes he is.” There’s nothing on earth that can disprove that Romney isn’t worse. Know why ? Arizona still has Conservatives and a Republican party. Show me the ones in MA after Slick Willard got done.
Sorry, Arizona is a red state. There is NO excuse for what McCain has done to conservatism given that his constituents weren'y fire-breathing Mass. commies.
As I said, "no he (Mitt) isn't (worse than McCain)".
At least one exists to put up this web site!
So to claim that none exist is demonstrably false!
I view Romney in some sense as a Cecil Underwood former Gov of WV (Though much much younger!) a GOP’er who managed to get elected in a state where the GOP is outnumbered 3-1. Yes Cecil is probably a RINO by the standards of this forum. However given the political climate of the state, that’s the best you will get if you want a GOP’er elected.
Underwood was pretty ineffectual as governor, Romney did manage to get more conservative oriented things done. For example by 2006 the state had a $700 million surplus and was able to cut taxes. (In WV, state government spending & economic malaise continued to spiral out of control! I hear this from my father, since I don't live there any more!) The rest of the time Romney basically fought a holding action against things like democrat backed socialized medicine & same sex marriage to name a few. His solutions to these challenges were not my cup of tea BUT the alternatives was going to be far worse!
I was for Fred, but Fred’s gone! It is highly unlikely that there will be a brokered convention. So any dreams of Fred riding in on a white horse and saving the day are futile.
What we have, is what we have, for me of that three Romney is the better choice. (Ok I will be generous we have 4 candidates, I still say Romney is the better choice warts and all!)