Skip to comments.
New bill would make it illegal for restaurants to serve the obese
The Smoking Gun ^
| 2/1/08
| The Smoking Gun
Posted on 02/01/2008 4:38:48 PM PST by freemike
FEBRUARY 1--Mississippi legislators this week introduced a bill that would make it illegal for state-licensed restaurants to serve obese patrons.
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: agenda21; fatnazis; foodnazis; foodpolice; healthypeople2010; nannystate; obesity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-230 next last
To: freemike
As stupid as it is, I don’t see any reason the state of Mississippi can’t do this if they want to. But we’d better get over the idea that anything a state goverment can do to it’s citizens, the US Congress can do to all of us by claiming they’re “regulating commerce”.
61
posted on
02/01/2008 5:04:49 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: bigjackattack
fat people should be embarrassed to eat in public but our society no longer has shameBlow it out your ear.
To: nicmarlo
Of course there is no bill that would demand that all obese State Legislators loose their job, that would be oppressive.
63
posted on
02/01/2008 5:05:54 PM PST
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Gabz
In case you missed it...Nanny State Ping.
Smoke Gnatzies...they can’t ALL be skinny, can they? The chickens are coming home to roost! ;)
64
posted on
02/01/2008 5:06:03 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: freemike
This reminds me of an old New Yorker cartoon. Two men and a dog. "Don't feed him anything. That's as big as I want him to get."
To: sierrahome
Unless you last name is Donner or Lechter.
66
posted on
02/01/2008 5:06:35 PM PST
by
reg45
Comment #67 Removed by Moderator
To: processing please hold
68
posted on
02/01/2008 5:07:39 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: blackdog
Good way to keep Michael Moore out of your state.Most of his fat is between his ears.
69
posted on
02/01/2008 5:08:20 PM PST
by
reg45
To: GregoTX
Course not; don’t you know, we live in Animal Farm.
70
posted on
02/01/2008 5:08:36 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo
To: Morgana
define obese!Good point. That'll go all the way to the Supreme Court, where it will be ruled that an obese person is "anyone fatter than Ruth Bader Ginsburg". (And one of the justices will declare in a supporting opinion, "I can't define obese, but I know it when I see it...)
72
posted on
02/01/2008 5:08:44 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
To: doc1019; Pride in the USA
Will they have scales at the door? Who will say what Obese is? I think they'll federalize a new department under the DHS umbrella. The federal fat police will meet patrons at the door, where grannies will be required to remove their clothing so the agents can measure their BMI with calipers.
73
posted on
02/01/2008 5:09:32 PM PST
by
lonevoice
(It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
To: processing please hold
They have the “time” to write these kinds of laws, but no time to worry about such matters, as “trite” as the ILLEGAL INVASION going on.....
74
posted on
02/01/2008 5:09:39 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: Nervous Tick
75
posted on
02/01/2008 5:10:03 PM PST
by
reg45
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: reg45
>> Soylent Green is people!
And darn tasty, too, if you’re hungry enough and they’re properly prepared.
77
posted on
02/01/2008 5:11:46 PM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
To: mamelukesabre
Gluttony does cause obesity.Good catch.
To: nicmarlo
Look at the bright side of this, serial killers don't go after fat people. They like the real skinny ones they can handle one on one.
In all seriousness, this can't be legal. It's discrimination.
To: John Jorsett
This wouldnt survive the first lawsuit, and he no doubt knows it.you mean the way McCain-Feingold is clearly unconstitutional, and can't possibly survive judicial review?
No man's life, liberty or property are safe as long as court is in session.
80
posted on
02/01/2008 5:12:40 PM PST
by
null and void
(Conservatism. It's the new Black...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson