Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan

Dan, I’ve said I wouldn’t vote for Mike, and in the fall I would stand by that.

The reason is that by supporting in state tuition and a free Mexican embasssy in Arkansas, he telegraphed to me that he is a real threat when it comes to our southern border, and by extension border security in general. When it comes to taxes, I will never get that video out of my head where the begged for them. Then he cut short the sentences of far too many people. I can’t support that.

The people of Arkansas that I respect have been just about anything but pro Huckabee.

Now, that being said, there is actually something to be said for a brokered convention.

My choice right now rests with a write-in in November. That being the case, what do I have to lose by forcing a brokered convention where the rank and file might actually by some odd chance remember that conservatism is what used to drive our party under Ronald Reagan.

I think Jim provides an excellent alternative to not voting in the fall, if by supporting Huckabee we can force a brokered convention.

While I can’t support a Huckabee vote in the fall, I can certainly support a vote for Huckabee to force a brokered convention.

Count me in. I’ll try to help force a brokered convention. It’s better than what our prospects are now.


43 posted on 01/31/2008 2:22:36 PM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
I think Jim provides an excellent alternative to not voting in the fall, if by supporting Huckabee we can force a brokered convention.

A brokered convention would be decided by the delegates pledged to the candidates who won them.

It's extremely unlikely that a majority would turn to a candidate who was eliminated early.

Far more likely is a deal to be made from the leading candidate and another with enough votes to put him over the top.

I have a very tough time imagining where the delegates select a Fred Thompson, for example.

The only way that could possibly happen is in a hopeless deadlock involving numerous ballots.

421 posted on 01/31/2008 4:29:13 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
The people of Arkansas that I respect have been just about anything but pro Huckabee.

But that's no different than the condition of the GOP in MA in the post-Romney years. (Not a lot of adoration there, either)

583 posted on 01/31/2008 7:09:26 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne; Jim Robinson

A brokered convention will result in Huckabee taking his supporters over to McCain in exchange for the V.P. or a Cabinet post. Huck is doing McCain’s bidding. And quite frankly, I think McCain is more dangerous than Rudy. We Swiftboated the wrong guy.


653 posted on 01/31/2008 8:29:50 PM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Count me in. I’ll try to help force a brokered convention. It’s better than what our prospects are now.

Sounds like a plan. Count me in.
735 posted on 01/31/2008 11:15:11 PM PST by Antoninus (The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson