Posted on 01/31/2008 2:09:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson
quack quack
ping to some of my FRiends; I have made my decision.
fwiw
So have I but I doubt we agree.
Indeed. And that’s OK. My vote is purely strategic - in hopes that pro lifers get a good seat at a brokered convention. I have zero confidence in Romney on these issues which are deal breakers for me.
:)
At least we all seem united against McCain. That’s the goal.
Why don’t we just put up a banner say, “JR, IS FOR OPEN BORDERS”. That’s the way Huck feels. Romney might just do something about the illegals, Huck wants us to greet them with a smile as if this is WalMart.
Cookies and hugs for everyone!
Here’s an objective analysis of how the records of the two Governors regarding spending in their respective states:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/clarification-on-huckabee-and-romney-spending/
“The bottom line? The difference in annual spending growth, adjusted for inflation, between Mr. Huckabee and Mr. Romney is not 3.9 percent compared to 1.8 percent, as the original post said. Instead, it is 4.9 percent versus 1.1 percent, a slightly larger difference.
As the original post said, Mr. Romney can still rightly claim to have done a better job restraining spending on annual basis than Mr. Huckabee, now by a larger margin.”
and medical care and food stamps and free education and job training and legal advice and and and an. a.. .............
Am I right about that, JimRob?
I didn't think it was that hard to understand.
One well thought out answer at one debate negates about half the points on your chart: Any man that would consult lawyers before responding to an attack on the USA should not be president.
I was wavering between Fred and Mike. I think I’ll go with Mike. At least I trust him on judges. In our TN primary system, I can still vote somewhat for both as we vote popularity (20% threshold for delegates) and also vote for the delegates.
And anyone who wants to reopen trade with Castro's Cuba, the most repressive regime in the history of the Western hemisphere and who encourages the destruction of our nation by ignoring the law and encouraging illegals to over run the country draining our medical, educational and social security resources should not be president.
And anyone who cosponsors patently unconstitutional legislation to violate the 1st amendment should not be president.
And anyone who violates the law by illegally possessing hundreds of FBI files on political opponents should not be president.
And anyone who is willing to endanger the nation by precipitously pulling our troops out of Iraq should not be president.
Well, I guess that's all of them.
No one is qualified to be president!
“Number seven, if we can keep Huckabee in the race all the way through, thus preventing McCain or Romney from gaining enough delegates to win the nomination,”
Incorrect. It will guarantee that McCain wins the nomination because Huck and Mitt will split the conservative. Thanks a lot Huckabee.
I think I’ll write in Jim Robinson. Maybe we can get a few thousand freeper write ins and get Jim a voice at the next Pubby convention after the ‘08 disaster.
Thanks!
Rush Limbaugh for President!
Jim, most of us are down to 3rd or 4th choices in this election cycle. The sad fact is that now there are NO strong or really good conservatives running. We are all being forced to choose from what is left over and so there is quite a bt of divergence.
I respect everyone’s right to make that choice as they see fit, as I know you do. I respect your creation of FR and the good it has done for our country. It is, the most conservative and all-American gathering place on the net. The vast majority of the people who come here and have stuck it out are good, patriotic and committed Americans.
At this point we all have to look at people’s records and their current positions and actions and choose the one we are most comfortable with out of a pack that does not have good conservative credentials. That means we have to assess the good and the bad of each candidate, compare them, and then come down on the candidate we feel will best maintain some symbolance of our values.
People all over the country are doing it...here on FR, in Maine, and in a bunch of places on Tuesday.
I have picked Romney now as my distant 3rd place candidate. I am not happy that I have been put in that position, but there it is. I believe he has the best chance to stop McCain in the GOP, and also the best chance against either Hillary or Obama in the general...either of which would even be much, much worse disasters than McCain.
I do not for an instant believe that Romney would be a disaster for America. I believe he would hold to his commitments and probably be a place holder and a maintainer of where we are now until the GOP comes up with a true conservative. He may also surprise us and be stronger than we expect.
Apparently a large number of FR members and lurkers agree. Apparently a large number of people in Maine agree. As you wisely said, those two (and all his other victories as well) may not make any difference in the end, but I am glad to see it anyway at this point before the big day on Tuesday. Either way, Romney has a huge mountain to climb between now and the convention.
There will be no brokered convention. Allowing McCain to continue his "surge" by voting for Huckabee will obviate any such convention. The vote simply has to be for Romney to stop McQueeg cold in his tracks.
Dreams, fantasies, straw-grasping and false hopes of a brokered convention are embedded in the minds of folks who look for any excuse and self-delusion to explain away their intent to vote for Huckabee......which is really a vote for McManiac.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.