Skip to comments.
US Navy to Test Fire Electric Hypercannon
register.com ^
| 01/30/08
| Unknown
Posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PST by Froufrou
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: Froufrou
![](http://idiotsyncrasies.com/uploaded_images/DocBackToTheFuture-740310.jpg)
64 MEGAJOULES?!?!?!?!?!...........
41
posted on
01/31/2008 1:17:17 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Rick.Donaldson
“good for shooting down fast-moving flying things.”
Like satellites?
To: Froufrou
Yes, when their unmanned there will be less potential for error, wont there?
while there will be details to work out, the unmanned craft will be piloted by real people, with chain of command available instantly for high value target approval. Nothing is perfect, but there are massive advantages gained in performance and lethality.
43
posted on
01/31/2008 1:18:33 PM PST
by
catbertz
To: Bob
The barrel would be open anyway, not having to contain high pressure gas.
44
posted on
01/31/2008 1:18:40 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(oil--the world currency)
To: Froufrou
All this so future captains will really be able to say “divert engine power to weapons systems”?
45
posted on
01/31/2008 1:18:42 PM PST
by
NYFriend
To: Greg F
Wow. Just wow. I want one.I'll take the next one after Greg F please...
46
posted on
01/31/2008 1:20:20 PM PST
by
John123
("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
To: Froufrou
They’ll be recruiting at video game conventions . . . “Enders Game” here we come.
47
posted on
01/31/2008 1:20:33 PM PST
by
Greg F
(Romney appointed homosexual activists as judges in Massachusetts.)
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: MrB; crghill; SampleMan; Hexenhammer; Red Badger; Dominick; RightWhale
It’s times like this when I wish I knew more about weapons and how different guns fire. Not to mention I wish I’d been better at physics!
49
posted on
01/31/2008 1:21:55 PM PST
by
Froufrou
To: Froufrou
But what I want to know is how much does this weapon cost each firing as far as carbon credits?
50
posted on
01/31/2008 1:21:59 PM PST
by
blackdog
To: Froufrou
![dr evil](http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o220/CarroLi/drevil.jpg)
"No word on sharks with laser beams?"
To: Froufrou
Am I to understand that these shots will completely knock out any electrical components of the target or is this just another way to fire a hunk of molten metal?
52
posted on
01/31/2008 1:23:30 PM PST
by
John123
("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
To: Froufrou
My wife has convinced my daughter that “pull my finger” is a gross boy’s game. Ridicule has worked where civility failed.
53
posted on
01/31/2008 1:23:30 PM PST
by
Greg F
(Romney appointed homosexual activists as judges in Massachusetts.)
To: MrB
Plus, you have all of the individuals in charge of different aspects of air battle, each able to concentrate instead of getting distracted by other aspects of battle, and fear of getting tagged. Yes, but it would probably take extraordinary conditioning to stop them from messaging each other things like "UR A FAG, N00b" and "LOL, OMG U PWNED th4t d00d".
54
posted on
01/31/2008 1:24:03 PM PST
by
Sloth
(I feel real bad for deaf people, cause they have no way of knowing when microwave popcorn is done.)
To: Froufrou
able to sweep the skies of pesky aircraft or missiles as soon as they dared show themselves above the horizon Before you can shot it, you have to be able to see it. There's going to be a continuous war between stealth and sensor technology
To: Sloth
56
posted on
01/31/2008 1:24:43 PM PST
by
catbertz
To: Sloth
Yes, but it would probably take extraordinary conditioning to stop them from messaging each other things like "UR A FAG, N00b" and "LOL, OMG U PWNED th4t d00d". LOL...
57
posted on
01/31/2008 1:24:49 PM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: catbertz; NYFriend; Greg F; crghill
Nothing is perfect, but there are massive advantages gained in performance and lethality.
Sometimes I guess faster really is better. The fallout from nuclear warheads makes it so last century, yes?
58
posted on
01/31/2008 1:24:49 PM PST
by
Froufrou
To: Froufrou
strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5 If true this gun could shoot down any orbiting satellite. It will likely require a nuclear power source but it could bury all its nuclear waste by shooting it into the Sun.
59
posted on
01/31/2008 1:25:13 PM PST
by
Reeses
(Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
To: Froufrou
Just think, a tiny marshmallow accelerated to the speed they are talking about would put a hole in you, or at least a very big dent.............
60
posted on
01/31/2008 1:25:53 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson