Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Photographer Hauled before Commission for Refusing Same-Sex Job
LifeSiteNews ^ | 1/30/08 | John Jalsevac

Posted on 01/30/2008 4:22:09 PM PST by wagglebee

New Mexico, January 30, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The case of a Christian photographer who refused to photograph a same-sex "commitment ceremony", was heard before the New Mexico Human Rights Division on Monday.

A same-sex couple asked Elaine Huguenin, co-owner with her husband of Elane Photography, to photograph a "commitment ceremony" that the two women wanted to hold. Huguenin declined because her Christian beliefs are in conflict with the message communicated by the ceremony.

The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, which is now trying Elane Photography under state antidiscrimination laws for sexual orientation discrimination.

The Alliance Defense fund (ADF), a legal alliance that is dedicated to defending and protecting religious freedom, sanctity of life, marriage, and family, is currently defending Elane Photography.

"On Monday we defended Elane Photography in court, saying basically that no person should be required to help others advance a message that they disagree with," ADF Senior Counsel and Senior Vice-President of the Office of Strategic Initiatives, Jordan Lorence, told LifeSiteNews in an interview today.  "That's a basic First Amendment principle.  The government is punishing Elaine photography for refusing to take photos which obviously advance the messages sent by the same-sex ceremony - that marriage can be defined as two women or two men."

In their complaint the homosexual couple has sought for an injunction against Elane Photography that will forbid them from ever again refusing to photograph a same-sex ceremony. They have also requested attorney's fees.

"Depending on how far up the ladder this goes of appeal that could be a lot of money," said Lorence. "Hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Lorence said that the ADF is framing its case in a similar fashion to the 1995 Supreme Court "Hurley" Case.  "In the Boston St. Patrick's Day Parade case the US Supreme Court said that the State of Massachusetts could not punish a privately run parade because it refused to allow a homosexual advocacy group in to carry banners and signs in the parade.  They said that would be compelled speech, ordering the parade organizers to help promote a message they do not want to promote.  To apply the discrimination law that way violates freedom of speech.  We are making a similar kind of argument in this case."

Lorence said that this current case is demonstrative of a "tremendous threat" facing those with traditional views on marriage and family.

"I think that this is a tremendous threat to First Amendment rights. Those who are advocating for same-sex marriage and for rights based upon sexual orientation keep arguing, 'We are not going to apply these against churches. We are going to protect people's right of conscience.  We are all about diversity and pluralism.'"

But, in practice, says Lorence, "Business owners with traditional views or church owners with traditional definitions of marriage are now vulnerable for lawsuits under these nondiscrimination laws.  There are 20 states that have these laws where they ban sexual orientation discrimination.  Most of the major cities in the United States also have these kinds of ordinances.  So these are a big threat, as the federal government debates whether to make this a blanket nationwide law.

"We see that these [non-discrimination laws] are not rectifying some unjust discrimination, but being used to punish those who speak out in favor of traditional marriage and sexual restraint," he concluded.

Lorence said that the ADF is "cautiously optimistic that the commission will do the right thing." If the New Mexico Commission, however, decides against Elane Photography, Lorence said that the ADF would appeal the decision all the way up to the US Supreme Court if necessary.

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Catholic Activist "Banned for life" From Publicly Criticizing Homosexuality
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121306.html

Christian Political Party before Human Rights Commission for Speaking Against Homosexuality
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/nov/07112706.html

Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Rules Against Christian Pastor Boissoin
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07120306.html

Alberta Christian Pastor Hauled Before Human Rights Tribunal for Letter to Editor on Homosexuality
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/sep/05090204.html

U.S. Christian Camp Loses Tax-Exempt Status over Same-Sex Civil-Union Ceremony
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07091902.html

Methodist Camp Meeting Association Sues New Jersey for Civil Union Investigation
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/aug/07081501.html

Lesbian Couple Files Complaint against Church for Refusing Civil Union Ceremony
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071011.html

Human Rights Complaint Filed Against Catholic Bishop for Defence of Traditional Marriage
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/mar/05033001.html

Homosexuals Seek to Shut Down Canadian Pro-Family Websites
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06073106.html

CHRISTIAN COUPLE FORCED TO SHUT DOWN B&B FOR REFUSING HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2001/may/01052302.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: adf; antichristian; christian; christianpersecution; christians; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; lawsuit; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: Pablo64
, is there anything that would keep them of doing such a piss-poor job that it would essentially be the same as not doing it at all?

No. Don't do a poor job. Do an excellent job, as portrayed by the guests shoes.

61 posted on 01/30/2008 5:54:26 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Exactly. Don’t have to worry about any repeat business or them giving a good referral to all their “friends”, either.


62 posted on 01/30/2008 5:54:56 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Oh, I'm sure that a lot of shoes would show up in the photos. The sad part is, those would likely be the only ones that "turned out", as it were.

Funny how things happen like that.

63 posted on 01/30/2008 5:56:43 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ECM

That went away with people of “protected minorities”.


64 posted on 01/30/2008 5:57:47 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Might have been easier and cheaper if the photography outfit had just said they had a prior commitment on that date.

Or just do a really crappy job of it.

65 posted on 01/30/2008 6:00:11 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (It takes a father to raise a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; SavannahJake; PaulZe; poobear; AKA Elena; Oshkalaboomboom; LikeLight; Ol' Sparky; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

66 posted on 01/30/2008 6:01:03 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ve have vays to make you accept what ve say you vill.

If you note the wording in some of the articles, we that oppose the gay agenda have “strong opinions,” not faith based beliefs.


67 posted on 01/30/2008 6:11:41 PM PST by DakotaRed (Keep following the media as they sell out America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: lepton
Wow. Apparently not only do homosexuals rights include themselves doing things, but those rights now include the forced servitude of others.

Orwell said it best: Some animals are more equal than others.

69 posted on 01/30/2008 6:13:40 PM PST by highimpact (Abortion - [n]: human sacrifice at the altar of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Private business rights went out the window with state mandated smoking bans on private businesses.


70 posted on 01/30/2008 6:14:01 PM PST by DakotaRed (Keep following the media as they sell out America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana

You’d think so, but too mant libscum have moved to NM from CA and have succeeded in turning NM into the same type of cesspool they left. As a result, “more equal” people have “rights” to force their beliefs on others.


72 posted on 01/30/2008 6:31:38 PM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
Private business rights went out the window with state mandated smoking bans on private businesses.

It's the classic case of "first they came for the smokers, but I did not say anything because I wasn't a smoker...then, by the time they came for me, it was too late...there was nobody left to speak up for me". The name "Nanny State" doesn't sound too scary, but it is a fearsome and dreadful thing.

73 posted on 01/30/2008 6:41:11 PM PST by LikeLight (Is There a Lawyer in the Church? Click my profile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Christian Post article: Christian Business OK to Refuse Gay Video Copying

and see how a video duplication service in Arlington County, Virginia was able to beat this kind of rap.

74 posted on 01/30/2008 6:43:42 PM PST by Procyon (To the global warming fanatics the problem is too many people and the solution is genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64

Yep, yours is the better idea. Subversion.


75 posted on 01/30/2008 6:48:00 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I would rather be cash flow poor, as I am, than deal with this kind of stuff.


76 posted on 01/30/2008 6:49:26 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ECM

I was just thinking they should have posted in their window, “We refuse the right to refuse service.”

What a sham.


77 posted on 01/30/2008 6:50:53 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
Nobody can make you take a good picture if you don't want to.

Fine, but that kind of response won't be applicable to the thousands of other kind of businesses that will have to deal with similar offensive "human rights" demands.

78 posted on 01/30/2008 6:51:37 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana

“Might have been easier and cheaper if the photography outfit had just said they had a prior commitment on that date.”

Sensible, but not really the point. You shouldn’t have to lie to preserve your freedom not to be coerced into servitude, act AGAINST your religion, etc. This should be obvious and taught in civics classes.

I bemoan the day that we chose lying over stating the obvious, that we fear the state rather, than knowing that the state is there to preserve the Constitution.

To all of you who choose lying — someday everyone will make the same choice as you, and on that day you will wake up in East Germany. Fighting for freedom won’t be an option.


80 posted on 01/30/2008 6:59:53 PM PST by Harrius Magnus (Pucker up Mo, and your dhimmi Leftist freaks, here comes your Jizya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson