Posted on 01/29/2008 1:43:23 PM PST by icwhatudo
Did not see it posted yet, here we go folks!
Some of these Freepers, who are enjoying the Democrat in fighting, don’t realize that they look exactly the same way when they use such personal criticisms to attack Republican candidates. They have torn the party apart and now we are going to get a Democrat running as a Republican.
It should be required reading for every so-called Conservative republican bragging about their litmus test/laundry list of requirements that must be met before a candidate can receive their piously self-righteous support!
{{{{Applause, Applause}}}}
“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”
Good post...unfortunately, dead on right!
The election has lost all of its appeal. I’ll stumble into the booth and push the GOP button blindly. No campaigning for me this time.
I think those FReepers you refer to are closet, or out, 3rd party advocates and it looks to me that is the direction that FR is taking.
Now THAT is funny! Works for me!
Thanks :)
Romney won in my county. The rest of the Panhandle voted McCain. Go figure.
I thought this was about voting not stoning. If you’re out to stone him, don’t look for help from me. I still agree with Jim Robinson, and if you don’t like what he said in the quote of his that I used, you can take it up with him.
????????????
Have a lot of trouble with comprehension, eh?
It turned out this way because it*s Florida, always suspect since 2000. The thought of any Republican voting for a guy who John F Kerry wanted for his running mate, who would erase all US sovereignty and turn us into a 3rdworld nation, who is Howard Dean on steroids—oh, hellll!!!!!!
I can assure you both that the only thing I care about is accuracy.
Wow.. Don’t be all pissed off because I called the Florida Race (McCain by 100,000).
1. Duncan Hunter is a pathetic loser.
2. Alot of FReepers are completely irrational delusional fools (including Hunter’s supporters)
Just the way things are. When you go around ranting that your candidate should be the nominee against the Democrats when he can’t even muster up double-digits in his own state, then you are making a psychopathic rant.
Sorry to hit you in the head with the truth like this.
No.
Without a TOTAL miracle, McCain cannot beat either Hillary or Obama. The MSM has so much crap on him that they have held back reporting on until after he {{{shudder}}} secures the GOP nomination that it will be enough to keep the 24 hr. cable shows buzzing like a bee that resides at Starbucks.
I'm not sure that ANYONE we had to choose from can/could beat either of them.
Mitt is the only one I think we have a snowball's chance in hell of winning with.
I despise McCain and have said so repeatedly and constantly...I will, however, vote for him if that is who we are saddled with come Nov.
How have you missed him talking about getting elected in the most liberal State in the nation.
You really think that living in MA should eliminate you from any consideration.
He has talked over and over again about the dificulties of running / governing MA. He flat out admitted he ran pro abortion and gay rights to get elected but found himself unable (morally) to govern that way and became pro life and pro traditional marriage. He admits making mistakes and learning from them.
McCain is proud to have Liberman campaign with him. Proud of the NYT endorsement and says he would sign into law Amnesty first chance he gets.
Clinton would at least galvanize the GOP and further damage the DNC. McCain would destroy the GOP. I for one will vote Clinton over McCain. I would consider a third party to oppose McCain. I am hardly alone.
McCain only won Florida because 20% of the voters registered as GOP so they could vote for him and will change their registration back for the Election and vote Democrat. Among Republicans he lost by five points, and barely beat Huckabee.
Two Republicans running against one RINO is not very fair. Unfortunately Huck seems to have made a deal with McCain to deliver him the election (for a VP position???).
Since we require a majority if Huck gets enough delegates and Romney is brave enough to stick it out the convention could still pick Romney.
You’re the one who brought it up. The improper use of phrase is your own.
I was not ranting about DH. Can’t remember the last time I used his name in a discussion in fact.
(It was less than 100,000. Any predictions for Super Tuesday?)
The place to click is on the 58 of 105.
The actual post in its entirety is underneath. I had previously only posted a part of Jim Robinson’s post. This person obviously thought I had made the quote up, so I posted the whole thing. The person could have searched for it on his or her own but instead, chose to appear foolish.
If you went to the Romney truth file, you clicked on someone else’s post. I am sorry if it confused you.
When condemning/damning someone/anyone [Romney], that person [JR; you, IF you did, too.] should be pure as the driven snow and without faults before doing so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.