Posted on 01/29/2008 9:00:54 AM PST by GOPBlonde
Election 2008 piece by Carol Devine-Molin For years I’ve been a fan of talk radio personality Rush Limbaugh, the “harmless lovable fuzzball”, and I’ve always enjoyed his humor and commentary. But recently, something has changed. He’s crossed a line. Limbaugh is now actively manipulating the Republican electorate in ways that are unacceptable for an entertainer, or even a self-styled ideologue and opinion shaper.
Rush regularly underscores that he’s a “movement conservative”, not a Republican partisan. That’s fine. But then he has the chutzpa to engage in heavy-handed tactics that are meant to skew the outcome of the GOP election process. Sometimes I feel like he’s morphing into a right-wing propaganda minister of the air-waves as he mercilessly beats on some candidates, and gives others (that he likes) a free ride. Rush is on a strange power-trip. As both a proud Reaganite Republican and conservative who operated at the grassroots, I really take umbrage with what he’s doing. The Republican Party is my party and the party of millions of other rank-and-file who love the GOP. Who the heck is Rush Limbaugh? This is a guy who probably didn’t even cast his first vote until he was thirty-five. Bombastic Limbaugh has even taken recent potshots at Republican stalwart Newt Gingrich. It’s time for El Rushbo to chill out.
True, Rush Limbaugh is among the most influential conservative voices on the political scene today. That makes it all the more disconcerting that Limbaugh is being patently irresponsible by spewing over-the-top rhetoric that could very well depress the Republican vote in the general election and thereby help elect a Democrat become the next president of this great nation. This is not a matter of free speech; Of course, the conservative poobah can make any public pronouncements that he wishes. But, by the same token, words have meaning and impact, and given the high stakes in this election, it’s difficult to see how Limbaugh is being properly circumspect. Yes, Rush, it’s your right to say anything you want, and it’s my prerogative to register my deep displeasure.
I’m in the awkward position of having to defend John McCain and Mike Huckabee against Rush Limbaugh’s rants, despite the fact that I will not be voting for either of these contenders in the primaries. That being said – even if it means crawling over broken glass or walking on a fire-bed of hot embers – I will do whatever it takes to pull that lever in the general election for the Republican candidate, whoever that might be. Why? Because the safety of this nation is paramount, and any of the Republican presidential hopefuls would do a better job as commander-in-chief during these perilous times than the Democrats in the offing. Moreover, the last thing that America needs is a bunch of blatant Nanny-state socialists expanding government and exerting further control over the citizenry.
Limbaugh recently stated: “What I said was that I, for the first time on this program, I can see possibly not voting for the Republican nominee.” On another occasion, Limbaugh was even more vociferous, as he espoused: “I’m here to tell you if either of these two guys [John McCain or Mike Huckabee] gets the nomination, it’s going to destroy the Republican Party, it’s going to change it forever, be the end of it. A lot of people aren’t going to vote. You watch.”
Well, what happens if either McCain or Huckabee survives Limbaugh’s onslaught and becomes the GOP candidate? That’s a distinct possibility for McCain, who is polling well and battling with Mitt Romney for the numero uno spot. Rush holds sway among conservative Republicans, and if he persists in his attacks against McCain, some conservatives will refuse to vote Republican in the general election if McCain is on the ballot.
As to the assertion that McCain or Huckabee will destroy the Republican Party if nominated, that’s sheer poppycock. Let’s face it; the GOP is already in flagrant disarray due to the policies of President George Bush who broke with conservative orthodoxy, and by extension, his party base. Upon his departure from office, conservative Republicans will look to reclaim the party. If Senator McCain intends to win the GOP primaries and the general election, he can only prevail by burnishing his conservative credentials and developing a special bond with the conservative grassroots. He may or may not be capable of accomplishing these things. In any vent, there’s a legitimate process in place that will vet McCain. Then let the chips fall where they may. Conservatives are smart people – They don’t need a crazed Limbaugh to repeatedly beat-up on McCain or any other GOP presidential aspirant.
Sadly, Chief Wagawaga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe is being both supercilious and short-sighted as he leads the pack against McCain and Huckabee. For Limbaugh, these two contenders must be quashed at all costs, utilizing his talk show power-pulpit to inflict devastating attacks. Limbaugh’s stridency begs the question: At this juncture, who is really having a deleterious effect upon the Republican Party? Limbaugh is acting like a petulant child, desperately attempting to get his way, even if it means overstepping his bounds and inflicting nasty targeted assaults upon GOP hopefuls.
Let me be clear: During this primary season, we should welcome debate and challenge the contenders on their ideas and records. However, it’s not necessary to go in for the jugular as Limbaugh is doing – He’s engaging in over-kill. That being said, really vicious assaults and infighting at the primary level don’t serve Republicans well. Why provide the Democrats with further ammunition to assail an already bloodied GOP candidate in the general election?
In the past, Limbaugh adroitly tapped into the fact that most Americans desperately wanted to attain victory in Iraq. Likewise, he should easily grasp that Republicans are extremely jazzed about the prospect of persevering against Hillary Clinton, the probable Democrat nominee. So the simple message to Rush is don’t unduly damage any of our GOP hopefuls. Let the primary process run its course.
However, there’s salient interference in the works from other quarters. It’s rather intriguing that the master political strategist himself, Bill Clinton, is out-and-about the media emphasizing that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are “good friends”. That, in concert with the recent New York Times endorsement of John McCain, appears calculated to impart the “kiss of death” on McCain, so that the Republican base will run tearing at their hair and screaming. Clearly, the Clintons and their liberal surrogates deem McCain a significant threat and they’re scheming to eject him from the political race. Ironically, despite Limbaugh’s efforts to harpoon McCain’s candidacy, it might be the finessing by the Clintons that does McCain in.
And, please, I’m not buying El Rushbo’s bogus claim that there isn’t a whit of difference between McCain and Hillary or Huckabee and Hillary. It’s Rush’s contention that they’re all the same. If either McCain or Huckabee become the GOP candidate, Rush would rather let the next presidency play out under the “Democrat’s watch”. He stated: “I think it would be easier to do that [advance a conservative agenda] with a Democrat president, given our choices here if it’s McCain or Huckabee.” This has been a rude awakening for me: Rush is no friend of the Republican Party. How dare he try to assiduously manipulate the GOP vote! And what has happened to his judgment!
For heaven’s sake, how could conservatives, in good conscience, accede to another Clinton presidency and place our Armed Forces in the hands of Leftists such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, who never properly respected the military and, in fact, hollowed it out and reduced its forces by half the last time they were in control of the White House! Rush, think about this clearly: You don’t care that our fine members of the military would again be used and abused by the Clintons? Moreover, the Clinton administration profoundly failed to address the growing problem of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda during the 1990s, which essentially unleashed the global terror war. Without question, America requires a leader that honors our military, and is fully prepared to fight Islamo-fascism. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out: Any of the GOP contenders would make a better commander-in-chief, than Hillary or Obama.
This describes Hannity for me. But Rush's originality changed talk radio, regardless of whether you recognize it or not.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1961423/posts?page=130#130
She has her radio show I see. I presume she has never said anything negative about a Republican ever as that would be playing the kingmaker.
DID YOU WRITE THIS “ARTICLE”???
This is a guy who probably didn’t even cast his first vote until he was thirty-five. Bombastic Limbaugh has even taken recent potshots at Republican stalwart Newt Gingrich. It’s time for El Rushbo to chill out.
Rush says he’s a Reaganite. But he’s not. Because the message that Rush is sending: Don’t vote GOP in general election if either Huckabee or McCain is the nominee. That’s an incredibly destructive message to send to this nation.
Rush’s rants against the Huckster and McCain sound almost personal.
-———————————————————————————>
Well I hope their personal, otherwise, what value would they have.
Rush is not a robot and his compassion is what attracts his listeners, IMHO.
My opinion against Huckster and McCain is very personal!
I don’t want either of these men to be the President of MY Country. How can one be “impersonal” about such a matter?
So, who is this chick, and how loyal to elected Republicans has she been? Here are two recent examples...
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Bush Versus the American People
By Carol Devine-Molin (06/22/07)
Regarding the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA), citizens are assiduously writing and phoning their elected representative to stop this legislation, but to no avail. President Bush is hell-bent on getting this legislation through, primarily with the assistance of the liberal Democrats although he’s not above arm-twisting a few Republicans. Reportedly, Bush has convinced Senator Mitch McConnell to vote for this abomination. What’s most troubling is that the president is side stepping the concerns of the American citizenry and the conservative base of his own party that have been his staunch supporters.
What gives? Has Bush become demon possessed or a brain-dead zombie? Or is he having a psychotic break? Unfortunately, it’s nothing as exotic as the aforesaid, although any of those possibilities would certainly make for a good read. I think we’re looking at the classic downfall of many powerful men - Hubris and grandiosity give rise to profoundly poor judgment. ...
( http://www.americandaily.com/article/19336 )
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Senate RINOs Betray GOP
By Carol Devine-Molin
May 24, 2005
Ultimately, Republicans caved and 214 years of Senate tradition have been cast out the window. It appears that “judicial filibuster” is here to stay. In a deal struck with Senate Republicans, Democrats will be permitted to engage in filibuster of future judicial nominees under “extraordinary circumstances”. Well what does that mean? It means that the Senate Democrats will utilize the judicial filibuster liberally and will continue in their obstructionist mode. The “nuclear option” - that would have banned judicial filibusters - was averted. Never mind that all decent Republicans felt that it was imperative to implement the “nuclear option” or “Constitutional option” as it’s frequently dubbed.
Senator John McCain claims that this compromise with Senate Democrats was in the “finest traditions of the Senate.” Personally, I’m sickened.
( http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/cmolin/2005/cdm_0524.shtml )
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Now, I hated these political circuses as much as anybody. However, her willful ignorance of the FACT that the immigration bill would simply put into practice precisely the type of immigration reforms that Pres.Bush has espoused since he started running for presidential office in 1999 is loathsome.
Her article about McCain is priceless!
This is a woman criticizing Rush? She’s clearly been doing the same for quite a while!
Those in glass houses ...
That was my thought exactly.
Their (the Mittiac’s) vocabulary will run out shortly and they will resort to calling you a hater or bigot.
Seems to me that Carol is probably envious of Rush's new blonde bombshell girlfriend down in Florida!
I have never heard of her, not have I ever seen that “big hair” of hers since the early 80’s.
Maybe she is just old, sour and jealous of Rush.
Who the He!! is Carol Devine-Molin, and why is she wasting my time?
I don’t normally have the chance to listen to any of them much, but my impression over the years is that Hannity generally follows the GOP talking points of the day, while Rush is out ahead even of the GOP itself.
So while some folks might think of Rush as a lightweight, and I don’t agree with every word he ever utters by any means, he is quite often out ahead of the party, and he is pretty consistent in his principles regardless of what the party happens to be promoting. Not 100%. But a high percentage, higher than most. So I give him credit for being deeper and more clear-minded than most any of the others, including the ones I like.
Regardless, IMO anyone who makes comments re: Rush is looking for a plug.
Hey, I called her a Kookoid.
I never said that she had no right to her opinion.
You protesteth too much.
I have the right, to disagree with her opinion.
I also disagree with your assessment of Limbaugh. Me and twenty million other people.
As I posted on another thread, I wonder what Duncan (DNC chair) and his buddies are saying. “Conservative voters will never let Hilary or Obama get elected. Don’t worry, they’ll vote for our RINO.”
What she - and a lot of FReepers - don’t realize: there are a LOT of people on the right wing who view the GOP as abandoning the base to secure more left-leaning votes, and these right-wingers are getting really tired of the lesser-of-two-evils “well you don’t want HER in there, do you?” reasoning which compromises away that which is held most dear. While these voters will, when faced with the actual choice, vote Republican, they are growing very frustrated and looking for a new, viable, palatable alternative.
What she - and a lot of FReepers - don’t realize: you can’t count on the continued support of the abused/betrayed forever. If the GOP doesn’t return to a strong grounding in the base, the base will leave - and there will be no GOP anymore.
There is a problem with anybody who simply said “need more troops”, and I’m getting a bit tired of this statement. The key was what to DO with those troops. Petreaus understood that, as he as by now amply demonstrated, and though McCain may have realized the need, until someone was able to propose a strategy to deal with those folks, they would simply have been wasted deployments. The “defeat and leave” strategy was the problem, and we may not have required more troops if we had engaged in a the present strategy earlier. If someone can point out for me where John had expanded on his “need more troops” statement to include useful Counterinsurgency strategies, or even simply that he recommended Petreaus long before he was put in command, I will give him all the kudos in the world. I don’t recall ever giving such an explanation, though, so all I can give him credit for is that he understood one piece of the Iraq problem.
That is obvious, but what is your solution?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.