Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The end of the Romney Campaign
World Net Daily ^ | January 29 | Janet Folger

Posted on 01/29/2008 6:40:55 AM PST by no dems

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-251 next last
To: no dems
This is why the media want Romney, they will knock him over like a house of cards with all this bad stuff.

You can tell how much the media fear McCain by how they tried to write him off as practically dead and buried in the summer and how they are now hysterically trying to say he is a liar for pointing out how Romney wanted a timetable (secret timetable is still a timetable) to cut and run from Iraq.

I am no McCain fan but Flip-Flop Kerry from Massachusetts was totally unacceptable last time. Why should Flip-Flop Romney from Massachusetts be acceptable now? By now people should be aware enough not to support a candidate from Massachusetts because Flip-Flopping is their favored style of politics.

81 posted on 01/29/2008 7:23:52 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (Hunter's endorsement makes Huckabee the last credible candidate on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Dr. John Willke, A Founder Of The Pro-Life Movement Nationally & Internationally, Endorses Gov. Romney

Saturday, Oct 20, 2007
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Kevin Madden (857) 288-6390

Boston, MA – Today, Dr. John Willke, a founder of the Pro Life Movement, endorsed Governor Mitt Romney and his campaign for our nation's highest office. Dr. Willke is a leading voice within the pro-life community and will be an important surrogate for Governor Romney's pro-life and pro-family agenda.

"Unlike other candidates who only speak to the importance of confronting the major social issues of the day, Governor Romney has a record of action in defending life. Every decision he made as Governor was on the side of life. I know he will be the strong pro-life President we need in the White House," said Dr. Willke. "Governor Romney is the only candidate who can lead our pro-life and pro-family conservative movement to victory in 2008."

Welcoming Dr. Willke's announcement, Governor Romney said, "I am proud to have the support of a man who has meant so much to the pro-life movement in our country. He knows how important it is to have someone in Washington who will actively promote pro-life policies. Policies that include more than appointing judges who will follow the law but also opposing taxpayer funded abortion and partial birth abortion. I look forward to working with Dr. Willke and welcome him to Romney for President."

Background On Dr. John Willke:

Dr. John Willke, Often Referred To As The Father Of The Pro-Life Movement, Served For 10 Years As President Of The National Right To Life Committee And Helped Found The Organization. A physician by trade, Dr. Willke serves as President of the Life Issues Institute, Inc., and President of the International Right to Life Federation. Dr. Willke had a daily radio program that was carried on over 300 radio stations for 20 years. His one-minute radio comments, entitled "Life Jewels," were carried on over 750 stations in English and 300 more in Spanish. Dr. Willke has written eleven books, is a lecturer and a frequent television and radio show guest. His works have been published in 32 languages, and he and his wife Barbara have lectured in 76 countries.

# # #

Dr. Willke founded the pro-life movement nationally and internationally. He founded and served as president of the National Right to Life Committee. He founded and currently serves as President of the International Right to Life Federation. He endorsed Mitt Romney. He said the Romney's pro-life record as Governor is solid. I'm sticking with the expert, someone that I - as a pro-life activist - have known and respected for nearly 2 decades. I support pro-life, conservative Republican Mitt Romney.

82 posted on 01/29/2008 7:23:58 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaleoCon1; Pravious; no dems
Makes you wonder what has become of the GOP when the top candidates are far from conservative and the most conservative ones are either out of the race or getting single digits.

I read that not as a failure of the GOP, but of the voters getting what they wanted-like 'democracy' voted for Hamas in Gaza.

Whether it's because the primaries have been infiltrated by "dem terrorists" as Pravius indicates, or because there just aren't really that many active conservative voters anymore...I can't tell.

I suspect it's more of the latter, and we really won't know until November.

83 posted on 01/29/2008 7:26:55 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: no dems

People have been claiming “the end of the Romney campaign” every step of the way......and he’s still there.

Romney doesn’t win IA and it’s the end.
Romney doesn’t win NH and it’s the end.
Romney doesn’t win MI and it’s the end.
Romney doesn’t win SC and it’s the end.
Romney doesn’t win FL and it’s the end......


84 posted on 01/29/2008 7:28:06 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Brokered Convention Bump


85 posted on 01/29/2008 7:28:06 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Take Romney out of liberal Massachusetts, and he will be more conservative than Bush by a country mile. Take McCain out of conservative Arizona, and he’ll be more liberal than Hillary by a New York block.

Exactly right.

You live up to your username, sir!

86 posted on 01/29/2008 7:28:39 AM PST by Zman516 (socialists & muslims -- satan's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no dems

The anti-Romeny crowd and the MSM have been writing his obituary since Iowa, and he keeps gaining momentum.


87 posted on 01/29/2008 7:29:52 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
He is not my first choice (or even my second), but he is the best of what is left in the race.

Don't fool yourself. Anyone willing to throw LIFE and the 2nd Amendment under the bus is no Conservative either.

Mere months ago, this entire forum was up in arms because Giuliani was the front runner. Now it seems, most are willing to vote for his social twin.

Romney's only possible value is centered around the economy (though I would argue that is not true either). His support is all about the money.

Those who would support him would trade the lives of children and their own defense for filthy lucre.

Shameful.

88 posted on 01/29/2008 7:32:24 AM PST by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more. Keyes '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

RoeGone? Wonder where the money is coming from?


89 posted on 01/29/2008 7:32:26 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

You post illustrates perfectly that we ALL can’t have everything. We can pick our “pet” issue and hope for the best, but other areas may suffer.

My hope is that in areas where our candidate may be lacking, he can be influenced by the people to do the right thing. We sure had a lot of influence on the border issue when it came up last year; I just hope we can do that again.


90 posted on 01/29/2008 7:37:09 AM PST by Apple Blossom (...around here, city hall is something of a between meals snack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bookwoman

You’re absolutely correct. A *politician’s* job is to do what the majority wants. Bill Clinton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, etc... comes to mind.

A *leader’s* job is to do what is right. And then educate the population as to *why* it is right. Ronald Reagan comes to mind. So does our current President, without the ability to articulate it unfortunately.

Romney I fear is in the Schwarzenegger/Clinton mold. McCain should be in an asylum, Huckabee is our John Edwards, and Rudy surrounds himself with con men.

Regardless if our next President has an (R) or a (D) next to their name we’re headed for the same socialist state. In some ways having a (D) president will ensure some vocal opposition by the Republicans due to partisanship. I didn’t see much opposition to the President’s Medicare expansion by Republicans after all.

If that were Hillary expanding Medicare, the fight would have been on.


91 posted on 01/29/2008 7:38:06 AM PST by rom (Deserted by Fred, I am now for Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
I can’t disagree with you that we’re in a mess and the Reagan Revolution is over.

I could vote for Huckabee in the general. I could hold my nose and vote for Ron Paul, even. I could vote for McCain, but I'd need an air-sickness bag after I did so.

Nothing will ever convince me to vote for Rudy or Flip Romney. I know what they are and they're completely unacceptable.
92 posted on 01/29/2008 7:39:15 AM PST by Antoninus (All you Mittens out there are going to feel like Flippers come November...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: no dems

As detestable as some of his social politics are to me.... I would rather have him at the helm of the country than a snake oil salesman (the Huckster), a Lying backstabbing RINO(McCain), a cowardly socialist (Paul), a one trick pony (Rudy), or a Commy pig(Democrat). Of all the evils we must choose from he is the least objectionable.....


93 posted on 01/29/2008 7:39:25 AM PST by SouthernBoyupNorth ("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
End of Mitt, doubtful. This article is by a Huckster shill. (talk about the 'end' of someone's campaign)

As to www.RoeGone.org - it doesn't exist. I get .....

No Server Found

And I'd like to see where the money for this 'new' 527 is coming from and whose running it. But since it doesn't exist guess I'll never know. But -- George Soros anyone?? He'd love to see nutzo McInsane as the GOP candidate and even POTUS.

Plus this is from World Nut Daily. They're almost a reliable as DEBKA.

94 posted on 01/29/2008 7:39:28 AM PST by Condor51 (I wouldn't vote for Rooty under any circumstance -- even if Waterboarded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
Romney's only possible value is centered around the economy (though I would argue that is not true either). His support is all about the money.

You got it. By the time he's done, he'll have spent more of his personal fortune on a losing political campaign than anyone else in history.
95 posted on 01/29/2008 7:40:21 AM PST by Antoninus (All you Mittens out there are going to feel like Flippers come November...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

Indeed.

You know what I like best about Romney, in all honesty? It’s that the mainstream media and Democrats are obviously doing everything they can to make sure one of the other guys is our candidate.


96 posted on 01/29/2008 7:41:31 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

Some of them are not dirt...some are out and out lies. Like the one regarding Romney somehow supporting the same sex marriage actions of the Mass Supreme Court, which he had not control over. In fact, Romney fought the same sex mandates from those justices and got the legislature to approve a measure for the ballot to overturn it, and then sued the legislature when it waffled. As to the executive order mentioned...I believe that is an invention. Please cite the exact number and its verbage. The author of this article on WorldNetDaily will not point any of that out...which in turn taints the entire article IMHO.


97 posted on 01/29/2008 7:42:01 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SouthernBoyupNorth
a cowardly socialist (Paul)

LOL!

98 posted on 01/29/2008 7:45:14 AM PST by Womp Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: BallandPowder
Anybody is better than McInsane. Anybody... My dog would be better..

Can you git 'im on the ballot???

99 posted on 01/29/2008 7:46:13 AM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SouthernBoyupNorth

You may just be the first person I’ve met to describe Paul as a socialist.

Anyone who is pro-life (on record saying he’s never seen a case where abortion was necessary), pro-1st amendment, impeccably pro-2nd amendment, small government (anti Department of Education, anti-IRS), pro-states rights, etc... is what passes for a socialist these days?

His big Sin to Conservatives is his stance on foreign policy. I don’t agree with him completely in that regard, but he’s no socialist unlike all the other GOP candidates.


100 posted on 01/29/2008 7:46:36 AM PST by rom (Deserted by Fred, I am now for Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson