Skip to comments.
New York NOW Chapter SLAMS Ted Kennedy for endorsing Hillary's opponent
Times Union ^
| 01/28/2008
Posted on 01/28/2008 10:55:17 AM PST by 1Old Pro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-198 last
To: detective
The angry, evil women of NOW are something to watch. Clintons raping and sexually harassing women is fine. Ted Kennedys abusing his wife and killing his girlfriend is fine. But endorsing Obama is unforgivable.Hit the nail on the head
181
posted on
01/28/2008 2:12:42 PM PST
by
MooseMan
(Sarcasm included at no additional charge)
To: xp38
I didn't mean the article. After Obama's speech, I heard on Fox that Caroline Kennedy was writing an op-ed in the New York Times in their Sunday edition endorsing Obama.
Sorry for the mix-up.
To: pray4liberty
Please God. We need you. Please do something significant and miraculous here.So far, that miracle is called "Obama"!
183
posted on
01/28/2008 2:49:26 PM PST
by
reformjoy
( Elect Hillary -- Destroy a Nation!!)
To: 1Old Pro
Never forget that the ultimate goal for the dims is victory in the November elections.
I think that the party elites have seen enough of Hill and Bill on the primary campaign trail in what has been a controlled, benign, environment, to realize that both are one video frame away from a fatal campaign error that will make the Dean scream and Dukakis in a tank look like astute political maneuvering.
There is no way the dims elites now want Hillary! at the top of (or perhaps anywhere near) their ticket.
The appeals to party unity and the good of the nation will start any day now.
To: tcrlaf
Karl Rove YOU magnificent Bastard!!
To: pray4liberty
I know. I just find it interesting they unleash on Ted but not Caroline. They both endorsed. Maybe they think it would be too over the top to attack Caroline even though this release is already the case IMHO.
186
posted on
01/28/2008 3:07:43 PM PST
by
xp38
To: Froufrou
Perhaps NOW professes that mashers should stick together...?
LOL...Good point...Whatever, it is a very salutary experience to watch the scum that has risen to the top of the Rat party go at it.
187
posted on
01/28/2008 4:01:11 PM PST
by
PerConPat
(A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
To: xp38
To: xp38
Caroline's opinions and campaigns haven't been paid for the way Teddy's have. She doesn't owe them anything, but he does. They've looked the other way to let his bacon be pulled out of the fire many a time.
HF
189
posted on
01/28/2008 4:01:34 PM PST
by
holden
To: 1Old Pro
Kennedy needs to kiss and make up by taking the NOW nags out for a nice joy ride.
To: 1Old Pro
A little late, but here's the popcorn to watch the dimocrats fight.
191
posted on
01/28/2008 4:34:32 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: DGHoodini
You should have been a poet.
To: 1Old Pro
I will candidly admit that this is a good example of the adage, The enemy of my enemy is my friend. More to the point: Barack Obama is personable enough, but hugely liberal. Teddy Kennedy is also incredibly liberal--a big minus, in my book--but without even the sunny personality to help attenuate the difficulty I have with him on policy issues (and with the burden of Chappaquidick to boot). So an endorsement of one ultra-liberal by another ultra-liberal should hardly be cause for celebration.
Or so it would seem.
And yet I was enormously happy to see the Kennedy clan--well, three of them, amyway--endorsing Barack Obama.
Why?
The only explanation I can come up with is that it seemed like a hot poker in the collective eye of Billary; and that was enough to bring me some momentary joy.
193
posted on
01/28/2008 9:43:31 PM PST
by
AmericanExceptionalist
(Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Why does NOW care about women? Theyre a homosexual group that supported Clinton and his repeated sexual attacks on women. Yes indeed! NOW is an "anti-heteronormative" advocacy group.
194
posted on
01/28/2008 11:37:39 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: mom.mom
Hadn’t thought of that.
;)
To: FormerACLUmember
To: 1Old Pro
Bringing back this great article when NOW went crazy on The Lifeguard.
To: doug from upland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-198 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson