New York NOW Chapter SLAMS Ted Kennedy for endorsing Hillary's opponent

Times Union ^ | 01/28/2008

[MooseMan]

The angry, evil women of NOW are something to watch. Clinton’s raping and sexually harassing women is fine. Ted Kennedy’s abusing his wife and killing his girlfriend is fine. But endorsing Obama is unforgivable.

Hit the nail on the head

[pray4liberty]

I didn't mean the article. After Obama's speech, I heard on Fox that Caroline Kennedy was writing an op-ed in the New York Times in their Sunday edition endorsing Obama.

Sorry for the mix-up.

[reformjoy]

Please God. We need you. Please do something significant and miraculous here.

So far, that miracle is called "Obama"!

[Natty Bumppo@frontier.net]

Never forget that the ultimate goal for the dims is victory in the November elections.

I think that the party elites have seen enough of Hill and Bill on the primary campaign trail in what has been a controlled, benign, environment, to realize that both are one video frame away from a fatal campaign error that will make the Dean scream and Dukakis in a tank look like astute political maneuvering.

There is no way the dims elites now want Hillary! at the top of (or perhaps anywhere near) their ticket.

The appeals to party unity and the good of the nation will start any day now.

[RoseofTexas]

Karl Rove YOU magnificent Bastard!!

[xp38]

I know. I just find it interesting they unleash on Ted but not Caroline. They both endorsed. Maybe they think it would be too over the top to attack Caroline even though this release is already the case IMHO.

[PerConPat]

Perhaps NOW professes that mashers should stick together...?

LOL...Good point...Whatever, it is a very salutary experience to watch the scum that has risen to the top of the Rat party go at it.

[pray4liberty]

Did you read what she wrote? Too good to miss.

A President Like My Father

[holden]

Caroline's opinions and campaigns haven't been paid for the way Teddy's have. She doesn't owe them anything, but he does. They've looked the other way to let his bacon be pulled out of the fire many a time.

HF

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Kennedy needs to kiss and make up by taking the NOW nags out for a nice joy ride.

[Salvation]

A little late, but here's the popcorn to watch the dimocrats fight.

[Mr. Lucky]

You should have been a poet.

[AmericanExceptionalist]

I will candidly admit that this is a good example of the adage, The enemy of my enemy is my friend. More to the point: Barack Obama is personable enough, but hugely liberal. Teddy Kennedy is also incredibly liberal--a big minus, in my book--but without even the sunny personality to help attenuate the difficulty I have with him on policy issues (and with the burden of Chappaquidick to boot). So an endorsement of one ultra-liberal by another ultra-liberal should hardly be cause for celebration.

Or so it would seem.

And yet I was enormously happy to see the Kennedy clan--well, three of them, amyway--endorsing Barack Obama.

Why?

The only explanation I can come up with is that it seemed like a hot poker in the collective eye of Billary; and that was enough to bring me some momentary joy.

[FormerACLUmember]

Why does NOW care about women? They’re a homosexual group that supported Clinton and his repeated sexual attacks on women.

Yes indeed! NOW is an "anti-heteronormative" advocacy group.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Hadn’t thought of that.

;)

[<1/1,000,000th%]

LOL!

[doug from upland]

Bringing back this great article when NOW went crazy on The Lifeguard.

[1Old Pro]

excellent