Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Undecideds jumped from 3% to 10%. Sounds like some former Fred backers might not have found a home yet.
1 posted on 01/25/2008 8:32:07 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: TitansAFC; meandog; therut; MARTIAL MONK; furquhart; sportutegrl; aroostook war; mossyoaks; ...
The McCain List.
2 posted on 01/25/2008 8:33:19 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

As much as I disagree with most of his positions, I hate to see Rudy trailing the pack (the irrelevant moonbat aside). I think Romney and Rudy are the only two candidates who have ANY chance at winning the general election, and if Rudy gets knocked out of the box, it’s a win for the media and RATS, since our chance for a successful candidate is down to one.


3 posted on 01/25/2008 8:34:26 PM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

This is an ARG poll. If their recent track record holds true, either Romney or Huckabee are on top.


8 posted on 01/25/2008 8:39:22 PM PST by Ingtar (Romney is not the answer. What was the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

For Florida, Real Clear Politics isn’t including the ARG polls into the Florida averages.


12 posted on 01/25/2008 8:43:03 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

ARG is the most unreliable polling firm nexxt to Fox News Polls and Newsweek polls.


15 posted on 01/25/2008 8:43:58 PM PST by nckerr (www.myspace.com/ArmyKerrFamily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

You are siting the ARG poll? This has been one of the biggest failures this season. Until someone can back it up with another poll, this is an outliar.


17 posted on 01/25/2008 8:44:51 PM PST by Grunthor (What if Mitt offered the VP slot to Ralph Reed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

They included 35 independents. I bet they freaked out. They can’t vote! Independents cannot vote in primaries. I say this is flawed.


29 posted on 01/25/2008 8:54:27 PM PST by libbylu (Why vote for a democrat with an R next to his name? I'm a MITTen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates
McCain +5 (from +7).

Free Image Hosting at allyoucanupload.com

30 posted on 01/25/2008 8:59:52 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

Everybody says ARG is bad, but it is so bad that RCP left them out of their famous averages. Ouch.


32 posted on 01/25/2008 9:01:59 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

My vote is already cast...early voted this afternoon for Romney. Killed me that I wanted to vote for Fred but Mitt was my 2nd choice and I wanted it to mean something as I know he will need every vote he can get in this state.

If Florida goes McCain..it will go Clinton in November.


37 posted on 01/25/2008 9:09:44 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (No One Gets To Their Heaven Without A Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

ARG are the same pollsters who said Fred had 22% the night before SC. These guys suck!

My money, especially after last nights debate, McPain’s endorsement by the NYT and Bill’s floating of the story that Hill and Johnny are best buddies, is on Mitt!

Stick a fork in McCain! He’s done!


42 posted on 01/25/2008 9:16:51 PM PST by Anti-Hillary (Anyone but Hitlery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1958577/posts
the stats are in the second post.look at the republican row.

Mitt is up by 4 in a couple of polls, 7 isn’t that far off.


43 posted on 01/25/2008 9:17:18 PM PST by libbylu (Why vote for a democrat with an R next to his name? I'm a MITTen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

Go no clear front runner.
Yay deadlock
Brokered convention Rah rah rah!
Discard the four liberal jokers and draw a new hand.


45 posted on 01/25/2008 9:21:13 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck is the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aren't going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Good night, y’all. I away for now.


46 posted on 01/25/2008 9:24:23 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates
Remember how off the polls were in NH for the Dem primary?

If Rudy doesn't win FL, my prediction is that he will do FAR better than is being prognosticated.

49 posted on 01/25/2008 9:35:11 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

This is going to be interesting.


51 posted on 01/25/2008 9:38:59 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

Norman Bates: “Sounds like some former Fred backers might not have found a home yet.”

Conservatives without candidates. That, alas, is our fate.


55 posted on 01/25/2008 9:59:27 PM PST by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

Not looking good for Rudy’s florida or bust strategy. Suprised to see the spread between McCain and Romney so large.


63 posted on 01/25/2008 10:32:46 PM PST by NoCountryForLiberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates
Sounds like some former Fred backers might not have found a home yet.

Count me in that bunch, I haven't got a home among any of the remaining candidates. Now that Hunter and Fred are out this is the poorest field of GOP candidates I have seen since I started voting in 1960. I don't know if I can hold my nose long enough to vote for any of them, but I do know that I definitely won't vote for Rudy.

My primary objective now is to stop Rudy from being nominated. I will vote for whoever appears to have the best chance of doing that, and at this point that seems to be McCain. That's not very encouraging because he's not much better than Rudy, but then none of the other choices are exactly outstanding examples of presidential timber themselves.

If all three of the Democrat candidates were not anti-American socialist traitors I wouldn't vote for any of the remaining Pub candidates next November, and If Rudy wins the GOP nomination I won't anyway. If the GOP voters nominate Rudy the party is over AFAIC, and I will be checking out the minor parties to see if there is one I can support without gagging. If not I'll skip over the presidential portion of my ballot and just vote for the Pub candidates for state and local offices.

This entire primary situation really sucks, how did the party of Reagan ever get into this sorry state of affairs anyway?

64 posted on 01/25/2008 10:43:37 PM PST by epow (I would rather lose in a cause that will some day win, than win in a cause that will some day lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates
It would be a real shame if the corrupt Amnesty-Bagman won Florida.

VIDEO: Profoundly stupid old man attempts to answer economic policy question (warning: painful to watch)

71 posted on 01/26/2008 1:25:34 PM PST by Dagnabitt (Like Mexico? Hate America? Elect Hillary or McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson