Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interrogator: Invasion Surprised Saddam
CBS News ^ | 01/24/08 | 60 Minutes

Posted on 01/24/2008 5:27:01 PM PST by blake6900

CBS) Saddam Hussein initially didn't think the U.S. would invade Iraq to destroy weapons of mass destruction, so he kept the fact that he had none a secret to prevent an Iranian invasion he believed could happen. The Iraqi dictator revealed this thinking to George Piro, the FBI agent assigned to interrogate him after his capture.

Piro, in his first television interview, relays this and other revelations to 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley this Sunday, Jan. 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

Piro spent almost seven months debriefing Saddam in a plan based on winning his confidence by convincing him that Piro was an important envoy who answered to President Bush. This and being Saddam's sole provider of items like writing materials and toiletries made the toppled Iraqi president open up to Piro, a Lebanese-American and one of the few FBI agents who spoke Arabic.

"He told me he initially miscalculated... President Bush’s intentions. He thought the United States would retaliate with the same type of attack as we did in 1998...a four-day aerial attack," says Piro. "He survived that one and he was willing to accept that type of attack." "He didn't believe the U.S. would invade?" asks Pelley, "No, not initially," answers Piro.

Once the invasion was certain, says Piro, Saddam asked his generals if they could hold the invaders for two weeks. "And at that point, it would go into what he called the secret war," Piro tells Pelley. But Piro isn’t convinced that the insurgency was Saddam's plan. "Well, he would like to take credit for the insurgency," says Piro.

Saddam still wouldn't admit he had no weapons of mass destruction, even when it was obvious there would be military action against him because of the perception he did. Because, says Piro, "For him, it was critical that he was seen as still the strong, defiant Saddam. He thought that [faking having the weapons] would prevent the Iranians from reinvading Iraq," he tells Pelley.

He also intended and had the wherewithal to restart the weapons program. "Saddam] still had the engineers. The folks that he needed to reconstitute his program are still there," says Piro. "He wanted to pursue all of WMD…to reconstitute his entire WMD program." This included chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, Piro says.

Saddam bragged that he changed his routine and security to elude capture. "What he wanted to really illustrate is…how he was able to outsmart us," says Piro. "He told me he changed…the way he traveled. He got rid of his normal vehicles. He got rid of the protective detail that he traveled with, really just to change his signature."

It took nine months to finally capture Saddam, but U.S. calculations on where he might be early on turned out to be accurate. Saddam was at Dora Farms early in the war when the known presidential site was targeted with tons of bombs and many missiles. "He said it in a kind of a bragging fashion that he was there, but that we missed him. He wasn't bothered by the fact that he was there," Piro tells Pelley.

Produced By Henry Schuster © MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fbi; interrogation; iran; iraq; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
But...but...but...but...Bush lied.
1 posted on 01/24/2008 5:27:02 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blake6900

Leave it to SeeBS to suddenly find this guy.


2 posted on 01/24/2008 5:29:00 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Tracking The "Flyin' Imams" since 11/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
probably like he surprised the spiders in that hole he was found in...they did’nt want to negotiate either
3 posted on 01/24/2008 5:29:52 PM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blake6900

Posted:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1959010/posts


4 posted on 01/24/2008 5:30:28 PM PST by CedarDave (The early primaries are port-o-potties rented to the left to pee in the conservative hot tub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blake6900

So If Saddam had nothing, why didn’t he give the weapons inspectors free reign? Why would you risk being the dictator of a country, having billions in oil revenue at your disposal, simply because you really didn’t have any WMD’s. Sounds ridiculous to me. After all, the man gassed his own people, attacked Iran, Kuwait, and even sent scus into Israel. He lived for military conflict and cementing his legacy within the Arab world.


5 posted on 01/24/2008 5:33:17 PM PST by xuberalles ("For The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties" http://www.cafepress.com/titillatingtees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
he initially miscalculated...

That can be a real pain in the neck.

6 posted on 01/24/2008 5:39:41 PM PST by outofstyle (My Ride's Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xuberalles
I just finished a book about Green Beret activities and it reports he had WMDs in the form of biological and chemical weapons and dispensers from a friendly Country and we lost troops securing some and others have yet to be found and destroyed. Chilling stuff.
7 posted on 01/24/2008 5:40:39 PM PST by mcshot (Missing my grade school desk which protected from nuclear blasts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xuberalles
where did the WMD’s that the UN tagged go? Easy, Syria with the rest of the WMD’s according to Gerorges Sada in his book.

Sorry but I do not trust the Communist Biased System.

8 posted on 01/24/2008 5:42:37 PM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xuberalles
What is with the recent furor in the media over WMD? This is the third or fourth story this week.

And as far as not letting the weapons inspectors in to do their job, where are the conventional weapons Saddam admitted to having? There were a lot of rockets and super explosives that Saddam admitted he had that were never accounted for.

9 posted on 01/24/2008 5:43:03 PM PST by infidel29 (I think I'd have a coronary if someone ever called Hillary out on her many lies and distortions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

Title of that book?


10 posted on 01/24/2008 5:43:04 PM PST by ECM (Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blake6900

Everybody seems to misunderestimate George Bush.


11 posted on 01/24/2008 5:45:04 PM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blake6900

No, now we finally know the truth. It’s Hussein’s fault!!!


12 posted on 01/24/2008 5:47:13 PM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

What’s the name of that book?


13 posted on 01/24/2008 5:48:56 PM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Humm? No real WMD? Does this confirmed they were not moved into Syria? WTF are we doing there?


14 posted on 01/24/2008 5:53:26 PM PST by Donnaplume
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

What’s the title of the book, I’d like to read it.

Did see something on Freep a couple years ago about some soldiers writing or speaking about a huge explosion which occurred and a lot of soldiers got very sick from fallout or something.


15 posted on 01/24/2008 6:01:54 PM PST by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Donnaplume
Saddam, admitted liar. How do you believe anything he says? Why would CBS give him any creedence?

I guess they think it tweaks Bush. Pathetic self hating idiots, the whole lot of them.

16 posted on 01/24/2008 6:04:49 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Donnaplume
No real WMD? Does this confirmed they were not moved into Syria? WTF are we doing there?

Two things:

Did you even read the piece??

You just signed up in December to lay this wisdom on us? I smell a 'Rat.

17 posted on 01/24/2008 6:05:19 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
It's all in here:

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)Deception Activities

18 posted on 01/24/2008 6:25:04 PM PST by BerryDingle (With friends like the media, who needs enemas ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

“What is with the recent furor in the media over WMD? This is the third or fourth story this week.”

I noticed that as well. I would guess we’re going to see a considerable amount of this crap throughout the coming year as the Democrats and their allies at the MSM throw everything they have into smearing the Bush Administration and the Republicans.

The Democrats are running two people that haven’t any real experience between the two of them. They are banking on emotions to win the White House, therefore they cry LIAR as often as they can to stir up the emotion of hatred for the alleged Republican Liars.

It’s pretty tame at this point in time. After the Nominations is when it’s going to be a wild ride with the likes of Hillary and Bill and their slander machine at full throttle.


19 posted on 01/24/2008 6:27:32 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Donnaplume
Humm? No real WMD? Does this confirmed they were not moved into Syria?

No, this confirms that somebody wrote that Saddam told him something.

Heads of states and former heads of states can claim that they have or do not have or never had nuclear weapons or that they never had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.

Talk is extremely cheap. Especially when the person that is talking has an agenda.

Saddam had nuclear weapons scientists just as North Korea and Pakistan did and the U.S. did in 1945. North Korea and Pakistan never had nuclear weapons and neither did the United States of America in 1945 ....... until, one particular day, they did.

Nuclear weapons are like omelettes in a kitchen. You inspect that kitchen at 7:00 AM and there is no sign of an omlettte. At 7:30 AM, a dozen eggs, some bacon and some shredded cheese is missing and, magically, four omelettes have appeared in the kitchen.

WTF are we doing there?

Whether or not we should have gone in there to solve the Saddam threat once and for all can be debated. Maybe he was about to whip up some omelettes or maybe he wasn't. We may never know.

What is perfectly clear is that, right now, if the U.S. bugs out, that will leave Iranian Islamist nutjobs seeking nuclear weapons and delivery systems with the military hegemony over 70% of the World's known oil reserves.

The technical strategic term for such a move is "Screwing the Pooch".

That is what we are doing there.

20 posted on 01/24/2008 6:37:15 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson