Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: May Not Support GOP Nominee
newsmax.com ^ | January 22, 2008 4:34 PM | staff

Posted on 01/22/2008 9:14:16 PM PST by kellynla

Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh stunned his listeners by announcing that he might not support the Republican presidential nominee in this year’s election.

Limbaugh said on Monday’s show: "I can see possibly not supporting the Republican nominee this election, and I never thought that I would say that in my life."

The reason: “You don’t have a genuine down-the-list conservative” among the GOP candidates.

“Wherever you go here in this roster of candidates, you're going to be able to point out ‘not conservative, what he did there is not conservative’” Rush said.

The Republican front-runners want the nomination “because it's their turn,” he also stated. “We tried that in '96 with Bob Dole and now they're running the same scenario…

"I'm telling ya, it's gonna come down to which guy do we dislike the least. And that's not necessarily good."

After Rush’s pronouncements, Los Angeles Times blogger Andrew Malcolm wrote: “Across the country, people were dropping their coffee cups, choking on sandwiches, fainting and driving off the road. The king of conservative talk radio not supporting the Republican nominee?”

But Limbaugh’s remarks are not quite so surprising in light of statements he made about GOP candidates Mike Huckabee and John McCain last week:

“I'm here to tell you, if either of these two guys get the nomination, it's going to destroy the Republican Party. It's going to change it forever, be the end of it. A lot of people aren't going to vote. You watch.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; gop; potus; rino; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 401-418 next last
To: Kirkwood
but I will still vote, because I want to be able to honestly say I didn’t vote for Hillary (or Osama).

Just out of curiosity, does your district use Diebold voting machines?

261 posted on 01/23/2008 1:34:46 AM PST by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

>>yeah, I have no candidates left to support, but I will still vote, because I want to be able to honestly say I didn’t vote for Hillary (or Osama).<<

There is a lot of room to still vote but not campaign and not donate.


262 posted on 01/23/2008 1:36:09 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: raygun
What, pray tell, has the El Rushbo suggested to be a solution?

When Rush leads, the solution will follow.

263 posted on 01/23/2008 1:37:16 AM PST by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

REAGAN '08!

What? You probably think I'm kidding...

264 posted on 01/23/2008 1:37:59 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
And so Rush, when it might have really helped, why didn’t you give Duncan Hunter some much needed name exposure before your vast audience?

Yeah . . . I'd like to know that myself!

265 posted on 01/23/2008 1:40:29 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator ('Anokhi HaShem 'Eloqeykha 'asher hotze'tikha me'Eretz Mitzrayim, mibeit `avadim . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rogator

Short Term Pain for long term gain.....call it the Nuclear Option.

And an option I had already chosen, unless Mitt names a Stone Cold Solid conservative running mate.

It’s like in Baseball - sometimes the team you got is NOT going to win, so you blow up the roster, lose 100 games for a year or two but in the process you build a team with talent.

Same here, the party needs an enema. Once and for all we need to seperate the Rockefellers from the Reagans and be done with it. If that means Hillary gets four years in the sandbox....regrettable, but necessary.


266 posted on 01/23/2008 1:51:58 AM PST by WillRain ("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: awakened
You arent listening. A non-conservative candidate might get all Republican votes but he might not get conservative votes. East-coast Republicans were happiest in the minority anywaays and would stick to the course if they were getting 10% of the popular vote
267 posted on 01/23/2008 2:26:32 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I suspect Thompson is still alive in all of this and may swoop in during the convention.


268 posted on 01/23/2008 2:41:23 AM PST by Onerom99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I like Dick Cheney, but he would get absolutely murdered in the general election by any fool the left put up. Outside of the base, Cheney is not popular at all.


269 posted on 01/23/2008 2:42:26 AM PST by Onerom99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
.


I'm a Fred Thompson supporter.

He ran a lousy campaign ... and then dropped-out ... albeit for his sick mother ... a good cause ... but NOT good enough for a prospective (serious) POTUS candidate.


Patton-at-Bastogne


.
270 posted on 01/23/2008 3:00:23 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Angels and Ministers of Grace, Defend Us ! ... StarTrek V, The Voyage Home ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: awakened

Gee... but it’s not any different IF we vote.

For if we vote for a Republican candidate, the liberals still win.


271 posted on 01/23/2008 3:04:46 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I agree now, but before Duncan and Fred dropped out, we DID have a couple very good conservative canditates. Why didn’t Rush come out in support of them long ago?


272 posted on 01/23/2008 3:05:29 AM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Well, as you say, the current crop of Republican candidates represents the Republican voter.

As those candidates, by and large, don’t represent my conservative values, I must not be a Republican.

So, why again, should I vote Republican?


273 posted on 01/23/2008 3:19:34 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
What I have been sayin.

Look folks, the RINOS are in complete control and have been since 1988. That makes it NOT SINCE 1984 that we have been able to vote for a true Conservative for President at the top of the GOP.

I would say 24 years is just a little too frikkin long to be told to be a "team player" and "get with the program" and "whaddya wanna do, put a ***DEMOCRAT*** in the White House!", and "shut up, your turn is coming."

Even now Immigration is being put in the back folder after three months of it being the top issue, now that Tancredo, Hunter and Thompson have been knocked out, as planned.

Sorry, more than likely NOT drinking the koolaide this year, folks.


274 posted on 01/23/2008 3:24:22 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Enough has been said already. The RINO takeover is almost complete. It is what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

As Mr. Rumsfeld once said, you fight the war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had.


275 posted on 01/23/2008 3:24:33 AM PST by Roccus (..........................FOR RENT......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk

Wow, I’ve never personally witnessed someone so brainwashed.

Though, it’d be fun to run as a republican in your district, knowing that I could call for the extermination of all red-headed Irish children... and you’d still vote for me.

:-)


276 posted on 01/23/2008 3:26:17 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Welcome to our world, Rush.


277 posted on 01/23/2008 3:36:24 AM PST by TADSLOS (Border Security is a foundation stone of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee

Hear, Hear!

Truer words have not been spoken - regarding elections.


278 posted on 01/23/2008 3:36:51 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Amen Rush....Many of us agree with you!!!!!!!!


279 posted on 01/23/2008 3:47:43 AM PST by catfish1957 (I will not bow down to her Thighness or the Taliban Section of our party. (Huck or Mitt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Rush is toying with the MSM after the “shut up” dust up. Of course they will jump at the chance to bring more attention to Rush. Reminds me my subscription is due
280 posted on 01/23/2008 3:54:24 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 401-418 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson