Posted on 01/20/2008 9:15:45 AM PST by Daffynition
RUNNING FOR president on a third-party ticket in 1968, George Wallace famously claimed that there wasn't "a dime's worth of difference" between the Republican and Democratic nominees. Would anyone tuning in this year's crop of candidates say the same thing?
Consider some recent sound bites:
"You said we would fight for every job! You said that we would fight to get healthcare for all Americans! You said we'd fight to secure our border! You said we'd fight for us to be able to get lower taxes for middle-income Americans!"
"Guess what they're doing in Washington: They're worrying, because they realize, the lobbyists and the politicians realize, that America now understands that Washington is broken. And we're going to do something about it."
"Washington told us that they'd get us better healthcare and better education - but they haven't. Washington told us they'd get us a tax break for the middle-income Americans - but they haven't."
You don't have to be a political junkie to recognize those as specimens of populist Democratic boilerplate, right? The only challenge is to match each quotation to the Democratic candidate who said it.
Except that no Democrat uttered those words. The three big-government platitudes above were taken from Republican Mitt Romney's Michigan primary victory speech on Tuesday.
[snip]
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
As much as I love Reagan, it’s time to let him rest in peace. We need an individual in 2008 who is a LEADER and willing to persuade folks to come back to Republican CORE ideology as Reagan did. Reagan is an original. It is foolish to try to be a clone. Times are different. We have different issues, however CORE Republican ideology an solves those issues - leave Reagan out of it.
"There you go again, putting words in my mouth!"
Sadly the Republican party has devolved into a RHINO party, going the way of the Whig Party.
Its long past the time to let Ronald Reagan rest in peace.
OTOH, Reaganism is alive and well.
The issues that Reagan faced in the 1980`s are the same issues America faces today: the enemy maybe a different but a strong national defense still leads the way, along with limited government, tax reform and support for the right to life. Throw in the mix, immigration reform as a national security issue.
The best direction for the GOP to take is still the conservative direction and the Reagan policy agenda remains at the forefront.
Reagan is a fine man but we need to let go of this Reagan wanna be stuff.
The issues are different. The world has changed since Reagan. We need a LEADER, not a follower of Reagan to solve todays issues using REPUBLICAN CORE IDEOLOGY. It is the ideology that Reagan pursued that left the legacy. Reagan for the most part followed CORE REPUBLICAN ideology. I want another leader that is willing to follow CORE REPUBLICAN ideology and not a finger in the wind zig zag ideology. What Republicans lack is a LEADER.
Agree!
There is very little difference between Demoncrats and Republicans. Republicans lack a LEADER that is willing to offend and educate the public on CORE REPULBLICAN ideology. It’s not about resurrecting Reagan. Regan as did Lincoln, left a proud legacy. It’s time for someone else to follow core ideology.
We have a new generation that barely remembers Reagan; this generation needs fresh leaders, not one who’s been dead for years. Conservative ideas and principles need to be explained and defended in the present day; because saying that we should do things a certain way “because Reagan did it that way” won’t win any arguments.
Whenever conservatism and Reaganism are employed, they triumph over liberalism. Whenever the GOP moves away from conservatism and Reaganism, it loses.
Only one candidate has shown he understands conservatism and only one candidate embraces Reaganism --- Fred Thompson. Too bad Republicans have chosen to reject Fred and instead, embrace moderate and liberal candidates.
If you're looking for a third way, you're in the wrong party.
Still true after all these years.
“Well...”
Fred is the most conservative of the bunch but my point is Reagan is GONE. We don’t need another Reagan. We do need a LEADER TODAY that will stand up and not bend over to losing LIBERAL ideology.
Reagan is a good man but he wasn’t the ideal - “no fault divorce” fueled divorce. What I want is a LEADER that is willing to STAND and EDUCATE people why conservative ideology WORKS. Academia is pushing LIBERALISM and you see that in how YOUNGER voters VOTE.
EXACTLY!
Fresh LEADERS! The DEAD cannot speak. Reagan is in heaven.
I agree with you completely we shouldn’t have to speculate on what DEAD person MIGHT say or do. The stupid Reaganites don’t get that. Conservative ideology is not tied to a PERSON.
No, your reply is “psychobabble” because you have no response other than name calling ... YAWN. It’s so LIBERAL of you ... .
Reagan is DEAD. Most voters don’t remember him and weren’t around when he was in office. You can’t cling to a DEAD man to carry the water for you. You need a LIVE person to stand up and be a LEADER. Copies are never as good as the original and Reagan wasn’t the “original” conservative. Lincoln more fits that category in politics. You need to tout a LIVING person that does espouses conservative ideology - not a DEAD person and SPECULATION on what he'd do.
>>>>>Yawn
You're tired, take a long nap. Maybe when you wake up you'll be in a better mood and you'll drop the liberal psychobabble.
I prefer a debate with a LIVE person rather than a DEAD person. Reagan did not “define” conservatism. He was a good man that brought two parties together.
“There was only one Ronald Reagan and neither Giuliani, Romney, Huckabee or McCain are the best suited to advance”
(correction) conservatism.
Reagan did NOT invent conservatism. That is where your confusion lies. It’s always been there as an ideology. It’s the ideology we need resurrected, not a DEAD person who we speculate about what he’d do. It’s ridiculous. Espouse CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES and explain the IDEOLOGY to educate a new generation.
More liberal psychobabble.
Carry on ... LOL
I prefer a debate with a LIVE person rather than a DEAD person. Reagan did not “define” conservatism. He was a good man that brought two parties together.
“There was only one Ronald Reagan and neither Giuliani, Romney, Huckabee or McCain are the best suited to advance”
(correction) conservatism.
Reagan did NOT invent conservatism. That is where your confusion lies. It’s always been there as an ideology. It’s the ideology we need resurrected, not a DEAD person who we speculate about what he’d do. It’s ridiculous. Espouse CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES and explain the IDEOLOGY to educate a new generation.
YOU are part of the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.