Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions on Treating Cholesterol
NY Times ^ | January 17, 2008 | ALEX BERENSON

Posted on 01/19/2008 8:20:27 PM PST by neverdem

Correction Appended

For decades, the theory that lowering cholesterol is always beneficial has been a core principle of cardiology. It has been accepted by doctors and used by drug makers to win quick approval for new medicines to reduce cholesterol.

But now some prominent cardiologists say the results of two recent clinical trials have raised serious questions about that theory — and the value of two widely used cholesterol-lowering medicines, Zetia and its sister drug, Vytorin. Other new cholesterol-fighting drugs, including one that Merck hopes to begin selling this year, may also require closer scrutiny, they say.

“The idea that you’re just going to lower LDL and people are going to get better, that’s too simplistic, much too simplistic,” said Dr. Eric J. Topol, a cardiologist and director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla, Calif. LDL, or low-density lipoprotein, is the so-called bad cholesterol, in contrast to high-density lipoprotein, or HDL.

For patients and drug companies, the stakes are enormous. Led by best sellers like Lipitor from Pfizer, cholesterol-lowering medicines, taken by tens of millions of patients daily, are the largest drug category worldwide, with annual sales of $40 billion.

Despite widespread use of the drugs, though, heart disease remains the biggest killer in the United States and other industrialized nations, and many people still have cholesterol levels far higher than doctors recommend.

As a result, drug companies are investing billions of dollars in experimental new cholesterol-lowering medicines that may eventually be used alongside the existing drugs. If the new questions result in slower approvals, it would be yet another handicap for the drug industry.

Because the link between excessive LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease has been so widely accepted, the Food and Drug Administration generally has not required drug companies to prove that cholesterol medicines actually...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: cholesterol; drugs; ezetimibe; fda; health; medicine; zetia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2008 8:20:35 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There have been dissenters from the cholesterol theory for decades, but you wouldn't know it from the mainstream media and orthodox doctors.

No statins for me!

2 posted on 01/19/2008 8:23:10 PM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My doctor says I’m not getting enough deep-fried cheese sticks.


3 posted on 01/19/2008 8:27:50 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of all the politics in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbmaltzman
No statins for me!

They make my legs and lower back cramp up something fierce.

4 posted on 01/19/2008 8:30:01 PM PST by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
My doctor says I’m not getting enough deep-fried cheese sticks.

My belt says I am getting a few too many.
5 posted on 01/19/2008 8:33:00 PM PST by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Next: Cigarettes Prolong Life, Researchers Say
6 posted on 01/19/2008 8:36:27 PM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbmaltzman
No statins for me!

It is not statins, per se, that's being called into question. Statins also have an anti-inflammatory effect. It's the "lower LDL can only be a good thing," and using LDL as a biomarker that is being called into question.

Data About Zetia Risks Was Not Fully Revealed

7 posted on 01/19/2008 8:39:00 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

http://vitamincfoundation.org/statinalert/


8 posted on 01/19/2008 8:41:54 PM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I had a major heart attack at the age of 51. I had had my annual physical exam three weeks before the attack. My cholesterol was normal and so was my blood pressure. I had never had a problem with either and was never on medication. I was not a smoker or much of a drinker. There was no history of heart disease in my family. I was maybe 10 pounds overweight at the most. Five years later, I am still on maintenance drugs but my cholesterol is normal. My doctor has me take 10mg Lipitor tablet and split in half each day. They say a small dose could be preventitive of another attack but I am not taking the statin for a cholesterol problem.


9 posted on 01/19/2008 8:44:07 PM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbmaltzman

Everyone would benefit from researching their medications thoroughly before taking them. Side effects can be worse than what the drug is treating. For example, some blood pressure medications can cause diabetes or elevated blood glucose levels. Buyer or patient beware!


10 posted on 01/19/2008 8:44:47 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We all are individuals, and we all will have individual (different) results from a given drug.


11 posted on 01/19/2008 8:50:30 PM PST by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You see my lipid panel


12 posted on 01/19/2008 8:53:41 PM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My husbands doctor put him on statins years ago. It seemed every time a new one would come out his doctor would change to the new one and up his dosage. My husband got to where his legs are so weak that he can hardly get up. I told him a long time ago I thought the statins were the problem but he believed in his doctor. Now he is finally beginning to believe that may be the case. I don’t know if taking him off would reverse the effect some or not. I think it is to late.


13 posted on 01/19/2008 8:54:34 PM PST by Spunky ("You have Freedom of Choice, but not the Consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; editor-surveyor

My doctor told me that the best thing for lowering LDL was exercise, the aerobic kind like swimming.

I was also warned that many of the cholesterol lowering drugs that are meant for lowering LDL also lower HDL. They don’t work on just the bad.


14 posted on 01/19/2008 8:56:58 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don; neverdem; LadyDoc; Jim Noble
We all are individuals, and we all will have individual (different) results from a given drug.

I once saw that high school dropout, Peter Jennings ask why drug companies were allowed to patent and sell drugs that are used to treat conditions similar to other drugs already on the market.

15 posted on 01/19/2008 9:03:19 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Sart giving him high doses of CoEnzyme Q-10, immediately.

Hubby takes the 200-300mg capsules every day and most of the leg [and memory] problems induced by this virtual rat poison have subsided.

I hope it helps your husband as well but it might take a while to see the difference.

Our doctor yanked hubby’s statins as soon as we became his patients and put him on high doeses of Niacin, instead.

Hubby hasn’t taken a statin in -years- and his cholesterol levels are very good.

Hang in there!


16 posted on 01/19/2008 9:03:51 PM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

It’s worth a try. If it’s just a side-effect, there’s a good chance it could go away when he’s off the medicine. At least by getting off, it won’t get any worse and he could build his strength back up with an exercise regime, which will help his cholesterol anyway. If he stays on, it likely will since it’s gotten progressively worse already.

Is it worth taking the risk that this will progress to the point where he can’t walk?

If he goes off, it’s probably good to do it slowly, wean off it. With a number of medicines, it’s not good to stop cold turkey.

Google *statins side effects* for something to show your husband for a real eye opener. I just did and now will NOT let my doctor put me on them.


17 posted on 01/19/2008 9:07:02 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

CoEnzyme Q-10 is good for many heart, lung and cancer issues. (Just ask Dr. Oz) It thins your blood too, so be careful. CoQ10 is fat soluble, so take it with food. Don’t take it within 4 hours of bedtime, or you won’t be able to sleep!
The statin drugs tend to increase liver damage. Always have your liver enzymes checked.


18 posted on 01/19/2008 9:12:15 PM PST by toothfairy86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: metmom
My doctor told me that the best thing for lowering LDL was exercise, the aerobic kind like swimming.

Swimming is anaerobic!!! It depends on strength more than aerobic capacity.

Running & biking are aerobic. Swimming isn't.

-Yossarian, the former (& and future?) triathlete

19 posted on 01/19/2008 9:14:43 PM PST by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Yup.

Three years ago, my doctor prescribed statins for me.

I went home, read up on them (google is my friend), threw out the first bottle unopened, changed my diet radically, fired my doctor, and now feel ten years younger. I've lost thirty pounds, greatly increased my energy and mental alertness, and rid myself of numerous minor ailments.

The side affect that worried me most was the reduced mental alertness associated with statins.

<sarcasm> Thanks heavens for that statin wakeup call. </sarcasm>

20 posted on 01/19/2008 9:20:29 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (The Greens and Reds steal in fear of freedom and capitalism; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson