Skip to comments.
Exit Polls: South Carolina
CNN ^
| January 19, 2008
Posted on 01/19/2008 5:27:06 PM PST by Plutarch
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: huckabee; mccain; romney; sc2008; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Lots more at the link.
1
posted on
01/19/2008 5:27:10 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
Since when did exit polls decide an election? Do we not count the votes anymore? Remember the exit polls in the 2004 Pres election that showed Bush being beaten badly and actually it turned out the exact opposite. Exit polls are just another poll and an attempt by the MSM, and others, to drive an election their way by trying to make people give up before the voting is over. They used to do the same thing with “projections” but now use “exit polls”. All polls are BS. The only poll the counts is the final vote count.
2
posted on
01/19/2008 5:31:31 PM PST
by
calex59
To: Plutarch
Looks like a McCain win to me. The tighter race may be between Romney and Thompson. Thompson may regret saying he was dropping out if he finished fourth. I doubt he meant fourth by a nose.
3
posted on
01/19/2008 5:31:52 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Plutarch
The pro-aborts are two-to-one for Romney over Thompson. Not surprising.
4
posted on
01/19/2008 5:32:02 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
36% REPUBLICANS: SOUTH CAROLINA...
MCCAIN... 35%
HUCKABEE... 30%
ROMNEY... 14%
THOMPSON... 15%
PAUL... 4%
GIULIANI... 2%
5
posted on
01/19/2008 5:32:58 PM PST
by
squidly
To: Plutarch
I was just looking through that. God these people are either stupid or naive, or both.
If Olbermann got hoodwinked by Thompson’s speech then South Carolina got hoodwinked by *ucker and McAmnesty.
6
posted on
01/19/2008 5:33:08 PM PST
by
TheZMan
(Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson.)
To: Plutarch
On the other hand, it looks to me like Romney’s weakness is McCain’s strength. So a close finish may mean less than I first thought.
7
posted on
01/19/2008 5:33:28 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: squidly
Yes he is ahead now. All I am saying is that it is so so close. That’s more like tied for third or tied for fourth, depending on how you want to spin it.
8
posted on
01/19/2008 5:34:32 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Mojave
I hope the GOP and NRC people are happy about splitting the party into so many fragments.
9
posted on
01/19/2008 5:35:31 PM PST
by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
To: Plutarch
Thank God exit polls don’t determine the outcome.
NH is a good example of that FACT.
10
posted on
01/19/2008 5:36:14 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: TommyDale
I hope the GOP and NRC people are happy about splitting the party into so many fragments.
All the president had to do was have Cheney retire and name a new VP after 2004. Then we would have had a candidate to rally around. Instead, we get this mess.
I know it's trite, but in this case, it's accurate--Bush's fault!
11
posted on
01/19/2008 5:38:56 PM PST
by
Antoninus
("Make all the promises you have to." --Mitt Romney)
To: TommyDale
The “Big Tent” has several clowns in it.
12
posted on
01/19/2008 5:38:58 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: Plutarch
To me, the abortion question is telling. It tells me that independents and Democrats infiltrated the GOP primary.
McCain is pretty solidly pro-life, so those voters didn’t vote for him because of his position. Rudy is characterized, I think a bit unfairly, as the pro-choice candidate.
So who were these voters who supported McCain?
13
posted on
01/19/2008 5:39:25 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: TommyDale
Going back to closed primaries would be nice too. This whole “let’s see if we can’t completely screw up their candidates” in the early primaries is patently obvious and should already have been fixed.
14
posted on
01/19/2008 5:39:28 PM PST
by
TheZMan
(Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson.)
To: Plutarch
Fools!
The lot of them!
Bunch of darn fools wouldn't know a conservative principle if it slapped them upside the head!
15
posted on
01/19/2008 5:40:28 PM PST
by
chaos_5
(Fred & Hunter '08)
To: Antoninus
Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton, Clinton
Very depressing
16
posted on
01/19/2008 5:41:36 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: squidly
46% reporting
McCain 69,598 33%
Huckabee 61,342 30%
Thompson 33,748 16%
Romney 31,081 15%
Paul 7,952 4%
Giuliani 4,142 2%
Hunter 487 0%
17
posted on
01/19/2008 5:42:29 PM PST
by
TheZMan
(Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson.)
To: chaos_5
We are in for a Rat - 4 - years
18
posted on
01/19/2008 5:43:01 PM PST
by
reefdiver
(The sheriff of Nottingham collected taxes on behalf of the common good)
To: Plutarch
Notice that they are polling on abortion, where Dems hate the Republican position.
19
posted on
01/19/2008 5:43:31 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(Is FR worth our time anymore? All the "fun" seems to be gone ?)
To: Mojave
Only one term for HRC - no way she wins twice.
20
posted on
01/19/2008 5:44:49 PM PST
by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson