Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anita
I can understand them shilling for McCain. McCain is the perfect candidate for the Left. A very weak GOP candidate who will push their agenda on all most every issue.

McCain could not even pick up one additional state over those Bush won in 2004. So even if McCain managed to win, which is doubtful, the losers would be the GOP and the Conservative Movement

From Tax-cuts to the War to Judges McCain’s whole strategy has been to be as Liberal as possible and stay in the GOP.

Politically there is very little difference between Hillary and McCain. You get minor variations on this and that issue, like abortion, but over all McCain and Clinton share the same political philopshical outlook

McCain has done nothing for the Conservative movement in 8 years. While talking a good game on spending, he has done nothing. He has actively worked against the Conservatives on Social issues, on the WOT, on Iraq, on Gitmo, against Rummy, on Immigration and on Judges, on Global Warming etc etc etc etc etc. McCain has far more in common with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama then he does with Tom Coburn or the Senate GOP.

McCain would be the worse of both worlds. A mislabeled “Conservative” Administration actively advancing the Democrat Party’s agenda while knifing Conservatives in the back daily. You could even count on a McCain Administration appointing Leftist Judges in order to avoid fighting with the Democrats in the US Senate.

McCain would fracture the few remaining GOP Congress critters into pro and anti McCain factions. McCain would be the worst of all world politically for the Conservatives. At least with a Democrat Leftist Administration, as opposed to a McCain Leftist with a GOP Label Administration, the Democrats would get all the political fall out of their disastrous political decisions and the GOP would unite in fighting them.

The worst of all possible worlds for us in 2008 would be McCain getting elected President.

13 posted on 01/13/2008 5:23:19 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Very Excellent take which I think every Conservative (on this forum & elsewhere) would agree with.


17 posted on 01/13/2008 5:27:35 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

McCain won’t get the nomination. He can only win in states where Democrats, independents and the media can influence the election, such as IA, NH and MI, or other open primary states. You’re right.


21 posted on 01/13/2008 5:30:48 AM PST by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
The worst of all possible worlds for us in 2008 would be McCain getting elected President.

No. Hillary would be.

Wait. No. Huckabee would be.

Wait. No. Giuliani would be.

Wait. No. Edwards would be.

Wait. No. Paul would be.

Wait. No. Romney would be.

Wait. No. Obama would be.

Wait. No. Okay. McCain would be.

Wait. No. ...
45 posted on 01/13/2008 5:52:01 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
Excellent post John.
51 posted on 01/13/2008 5:56:17 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
McCain and Rudy strike me as similar candidates. Rudy is liberal on social issues, McCain is liberal on social and spending issues, and both are (supposedly) strong on defense and the war on terror.

This is borne out in the polls. As McCain has ascended, Rudy has fallen. My conclusion is McCain is taking Rudy’s votes. If you add their totals, they are never higher than about 40%.

This is why I do not fear either will be nominated. They will never get more than 40% of the Republicans on their side.

Social conservatives are split among Fred, Romney, and Huckabee. If these folks would coalesce around Fred, I’ll be content. Romney is my second choice, and Huck a distant third.

168 posted on 01/13/2008 6:56:41 AM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
Cannot be worse than Hilliary IMHO
251 posted on 01/13/2008 7:27:48 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
"The worst of all possible worlds for us in 2008 would be McCain getting elected President."

Very well put, I agree with every word of your post #13!

310 posted on 01/13/2008 7:52:17 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Are you insane? A democrat prez will give us 2 or 3 more wild-left supreme justices. With mccain we have a pretty good chance of getting good justices, and a very good chance of getting okay ones.

What’s wrong with you guys? I would prefer Mitt, Huck or Fred. Most of the criticisms of Mccain are correct. And who knows who is most electable? But we could do a whole lot worse than mccain. My goodness!


311 posted on 01/13/2008 7:52:26 AM PST by guitarist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson