Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change

Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.

Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.

“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not however a unique event for the planet although it is critically important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”

As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we are saying today is that my own research and that of the other scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” the SSRC forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and possibly dangerous cold arrive.”

When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the street, Casey was firm. “The last time this particular cycle regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the “Bi-Centennial Cycle” solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what historian John D. Post called the ‘last great subsistence crisis.’ With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next Bi-Centennial Cycle’s impact versus the last is that we will have over 8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the ‘perfect storm of global food shortages’ in the next climate change. In answer to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.”

Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked whether the government has been notified. “Yes, as soon as my research revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House science committees as well as most of the nation’s media outlets. Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare. Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on the next climate change. Some of the world’s brightest scientists, also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the Earth’s climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most important climate story of this century.”

More information on the Space and Science Research Center is available at: www.spaceandscience.net

Any good general physicists out there?

Just wondering, in terms of all the planets, and their mass, and there periods of rotation, can we calculate how that all sums up in terms of where the center of gravity is of the solar system, and how far it is from the suns true physical center, and how the sun’s average rotation around that center of gravity is?

I’m kinda sorta willing to bet that it’s eleven years...

Can’t find it in my Flammarion...

“Hey, I hope what they’re saying is true.”

I don’t, except to maybe prove the AGW crowd wrong. Cooling will be bad on the food crops, etc. However, I think our global economy is better suited to deal with it than we were 200 years ago. However, there will be a learning curve and time to adapt to the changes that many will suffer I am sure.

And, looking at the late start to this sunspot cycle I think they could be correct. Not to mention that we are in a warm period that is longer than any recent (well, in the last 20 million years) warm period before an ice age. The big ones - with over a mile of ice over my house type.

The guy may be right, but he doesn't have much credibility, even with AGW Theory skeptics who agree with his points. His biggest problem is that he comes across as self important and obnoxious. Read more here.

Read the comments at your link on Casey. Appears they are more pro Casey and are critical of the pdf article.

Read the comments at your link on Casey. Appears they are more pro Casey and are critical of the pdf article.

Okay, a father and son support Casey. Casey, in turn, has posted nice things on the son's blog. Yawn.

No one else posts anything, aside from a two line response by the blog owner and it's hardly supportive. No offense, but that's hardly overwhelming support.

Look, I happen to agree with Casey's arguments. Well, maybe not agree, but I consider them plausible, which is more than I can say about AGW theory.

I find Casey's press release where he's informed the White House, etc. of the findings of his "scientists" to be obnoxious, pretentious, and a rather complete turn-off. It's almost like something Leo-the-lame-brained-DiCaprio or Tim Robbins or George Clooney would issue, but without the celebrity.

If he would just try to inform without trying to pretend he's the head of some big think tank (and please donate) and someone with some kind of relationship with the country's political leaders, he would come across a lot better.

This is a classic case of the style of the communicator getting in the way of the message. He does not appear credible, which tarnishes his message. As one who would like to see more people consider the solar cycle theory, I find him irritating.

Given the responses on this thread, I think I've got company.

Oh, no, you know better than that.

As I told my mother in law -

after I told her that the data showed the earth was actually cooling, and she looked as if I’d just said that I shot her favorite puppy,

don’t worry, whether the earth is cooling or warming, the answer will ALWAYS be

Global Socialism, reduced lifestyle, stifling of capitalism, and increased control over the individual.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.