Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six candidates to participate in historic 2008 S.C. GOP Presidential Candidates Debate (No Hunter)
SC GOP ^ | 1/9/08 | Staff

Posted on 01/09/2008 11:47:11 AM PST by pissant

Contact: Rob Godfrey, Communications Director 803.807.7144

COLUMBIA, S.C. - Excitement surrounding presidential politics in South Carolina continues to grow as South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson today announced that invitations have been extended to and accepted by six Republican presidential candidates to participate in the 2008 South Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

"The stakes couldn't be higher this election, and we couldn't be more excited to extend a warm South Carolina welcome to six White House hopefuls who are seeking the Republican nomination to be the next President of the United States," said Dawson. "These candidates join tens of thousands of Republicans from across the country and hundreds of journalists from around the world who are converging on Myrtle Beach for this debate because they know the 2008 election could be decided on our stage that night."

The following candidates will be receiving formal invitations from the South Carolina Republican Party to the 2008 South Carolina Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate (in alphabetical order):

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani - New York City

Former Governor Mike Huckabee - Arkansas

U.S. Senator John McCain - Arizona

U.S. Congressman Ron Paul - Texas

Former Governor Mitt Romney - Massachusetts

Former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson - Tennessee

Candidates who received invitations to participate in the debate have announced formal campaigns for president; filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission and the South Carolina Republican Party to run for president; paid all candidate filing fees associated with their candidacy; met all U. S. constitutional requirements; and garnered at least 5% of the national electorate as determined by an average of the most recent national telephone polls of registered voters conducted by non-partisan public opinion polling organizations leading up to the registration deadline as determined by the South Carolina Republican Party and FOX News Channel; or, place in the top five in the New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary on January 8, 2008.

The 2008 South Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate will be televised live by FOX News Channel at 9:00 PM from the Myrtle Beach Convention Center on Thursday, January 10, 2008. FOX News Channel Washington Managing Editor Brit Hume will moderate the debate while FOX News anchor Chris Wallace and White House Correspondent Wendell Goler will ask questions of the candidates.

FOX News Radio (FNR) will also provide listeners with live debate coverage beginning at 9 PM/ET. FNR’s Mike Majchrowitz will anchor the debate live from inside the hall. Following the debate, Majchrowitz and FNR Political Analyst and Washington Post columnist Jeff Birnbaum will provide post-debate analysis. They will be joined by FOX News Radio Correspondent Todd Starnes and several special guests live from “Spin Alley”.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2008election; duncanhunter; election2008; fredthompson; gopdebates; hunter; sc2008; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-298 next last
To: pissant

This sucks. I hate FOX. You can’t get anywhere when excluded from the debates. He worked hard in NH and ended up with nothing. I love Duncan Hunter, and I’m still going to support him, but I really don’t think he’s going to have a shot.


201 posted on 01/09/2008 3:03:47 PM PST by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

bttt


202 posted on 01/09/2008 3:04:45 PM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter...President '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar; Spiff; Reaganesque; elizabetty; bethtopaz; lonevoice; buccaneer81; Hoodat; ...

Thursday night debate in SC Jan 10th!


203 posted on 01/09/2008 3:08:49 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No, five candidates and one major distraction named “Ron Paul”.


204 posted on 01/09/2008 3:10:07 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Everybody’s unavailable.

What a bunch of cowards!

SC is proud of their heritage.

Tell them they’re acting like doormats for elite New Yorkers and shafting a military veteran for a liberal pos.


205 posted on 01/09/2008 3:11:31 PM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I can see it and it breaks my heart!


206 posted on 01/09/2008 3:15:01 PM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek
The RNC has picked their man McCain!

My exact thoughts.

207 posted on 01/09/2008 3:15:35 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma

Come on, put on your thinking cap. It’s not that hard.


208 posted on 01/09/2008 3:22:49 PM PST by Little_GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Little_GTO; All
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people...of the characters and conduct of their rulers." —John Adams
209 posted on 01/09/2008 3:25:30 PM PST by AuntB (" DON'T LET THE PRESS PICK YOUR CANDIDATE!" Mrs. Duncan Hunter 1/5/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Hunter doesn’t belong, but neither does Ron Paul.


210 posted on 01/09/2008 3:32:44 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It is outrageous that Hunter is excluded. MSM is determined to push McCain/Huckabee/Rudy down our throats. It is too early in the game to exclude anyone.


211 posted on 01/09/2008 3:37:22 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa
Why no Hunter? - he makes more sense than the rest of them!

You answered your own question!

212 posted on 01/09/2008 3:42:45 PM PST by Fresh Wind (Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

Their top tier marionettes are McCain and Giuliani.


213 posted on 01/09/2008 3:47:23 PM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Little_GTO
No, it isn't, which is why I wonder why you're stalling. I've already stated I would stick with exactly the criteria they used - prior primary finish OR national polling percentage. Your turn.
214 posted on 01/09/2008 4:00:31 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Informed Public Bump


215 posted on 01/09/2008 4:01:05 PM PST by Little_GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Ok, I’ll give you a hint. Take a look at the list posted up-thread, here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1950953/posts?page=164#164

Now tell me which people on that list are nationally recognized candidates that have not dropped out?

Your task is to figure out a definition of “nationally recognized” that is not based on poll data or prior state election results.

216 posted on 01/09/2008 4:11:53 PM PST by Little_GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
It is funny, isn it?

They push us in a corner.

They black us out during natonal news coverage. (Few stories, or just ridiculing references, photoshopping debate photos to just show the Congressman's elbow, with the "annointed choices" only clearly shown.)

Then they leave us out of debates, even though our guy is a multi-termed GOP Congressman with delegates already.

And then the ICING ON THE CAKE. What I call the "you've gotta lotta nerve!" moment:

They come, handwringing to us in late October, PLEADING FOR US TO VOTE FOR THE GOP NOMINEE, otherwise they say the election will go to the big bad Democrats.

If this isn't playing us for fools and disrespecting us, I don't know what is.

Under that kind of environment, who WOULD among us Duncan Hunter supporters get behind a RINO in the general election if there were a Conservative, ballot qualified Alternative??


217 posted on 01/09/2008 4:19:34 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Why should RINOs ask for my vote in November when they & MSM screwed True Conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This is getting RIDICULOUS!!!


218 posted on 01/09/2008 4:21:57 PM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little_GTO
Except the South Carolina Republicans didn't mention "nationally recognized", did they? And how does that get measured? If one person in each state recognizes your name, you're in? After all, that's "recognition", is it not? That "one person" rule would explain the 1% in the polls, but does it qualify one for a debate? I'm afraid if "natioally recognized" is your criteria, you'll have to further define what "nationally recognized" really means.

As I said to pissant, I understand that you're peeved Hunter is left out. But there's little in their criteria that would count as "dirty tricks" or any other conspiracy. If, after campaigning for months and having completed three state races, you can't poll better than 5% nationally, you haven't a prayer. All Hunter had to do to make this a moot point was finish in the top five in NH, OR -- not and, but OR -- poll at 5% in the polls nationally. He didn't.

219 posted on 01/09/2008 4:23:39 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Thanks Lion.


220 posted on 01/09/2008 4:31:29 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Wise men seek him still...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson