To: Reagan Man
Whatever. I find it humorous that Freepers who support Hunter or Thompson---who have flopped miserably so far---turn their bile on Mitt or Huck, rather than ask why Hunter can't get above 1-2%; why Fred didn't do well in a deep red state (WY) where he should have cleaned up; and why he is sinking in SC, maybe out of 4th place.
So "all his money" has won Romney a helluva lot---much more than all Fred's and Hunter's and McCain's money put together so far.
135 posted on
01/08/2008 5:51:00 PM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
Excellent points. Great post! : )
138 posted on
01/08/2008 5:52:20 PM PST by
TAdams8591
((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary and Obama!))
To: LS
Excellent points. Great post! : )
141 posted on
01/08/2008 5:52:59 PM PST by
TAdams8591
((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary and Obama!))
To: LS
>>>>>I find it humorous that Freepers ... turn their bile on Mitt or Huck...Come on. LOL You've been around FR longer than I have. The reason FReepers don't support Mitt or the Huckster, but do support Fred and Hunter should be crystal clear. Neither Romney or the Huckster are conservatives. Fred and Hunter are conservatives.
>>>>>So "all his money" has won Romney a helluva lot ...
It goes beyond money. It goes to trust and conservatism. Two aspects Huckabee and Romney seriously lack.
157 posted on
01/08/2008 5:57:55 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: LS
I’d never heard anything about WY until two days before the primary, and nothing I read said that Fred was going to do gangbusters there. As for why Mitt did better, it’s likely because his son lives there, and both are well known. I’m glad that Fred got the support he did, and I’m glad he’s done as well as he’s done in NH
291 posted on
01/08/2008 6:53:35 PM PST by
SuziQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson