I’d never heard anything about WY until two days before the primary, and nothing I read said that Fred was going to do gangbusters there. As for why Mitt did better, it’s likely because his son lives there, and both are well known. I’m glad that Fred got the support he did, and I’m glad he’s done as well as he’s done in NH
Fred with 1 delegate did well in NH, but Mitt, who still leads the overall delegate count, did poorly? Interesting. But this begs the question of why Fred would ignore a state that, theoretically, he would win (fairly easily-—if Freepers were to be believed). When Rudy ducks IA, he’s “chicken,” but when Fred doesn’t campaign hard in a deep red state, there is some other explanation. Just asking for a little balance here.