Posted on 01/07/2008 10:46:22 AM PST by SubGeniusX
Network security firm Sophos recently published a study on what it terms WiFi "piggybacking," or logging on to someone's open 802.11b/g/n network without their knowledge or permission. According to the company's study, which was carried out on behalf of The Times, 54 percent of the respondents have gone WiFi freeloading, or as Sophos put it, "admitted breaking the law [in the UK]."
Amazingly, accessing an unsecured, wide-open WiFi network without permission is illegal in some places, and not just in the UK. An Illinois man was arrested and fined $250 in 2006 for using an open network without permission, while a Michigan man who parked his car in front of a café and snarfed its free WiFi was charged this past May with "Fraudulent access to computers, computer systems, and computer networks." On top of that, it's common to read stories about WiFi "stealing" in the mainstream media.
It's time to put an end to this silliness. Using an open WiFi network is no more "stealing" than is listening to the radio or watching TV using the old rabbit ears. If the WiFi waves come to you and can be accessed without hacking, there should be no question that such access is legal and morally OK. If your neighbor runs his sprinkler and accidentally waters your yard, do you owe him money? Have you done something wrong? Have you ripped off the water company? Of course not. So why is it that when it comes to WiFi, people start talking about theft?
The issue is going to come to a head soon because more and more consumer electronics devices are WiFi-enabled, and many of them, including Apple's iPhone and most Skype phones we've used, come ready out of the box to auto-connect to open WiFi networks. Furthermore, as laptop sales continue to grow even beyond desktops, the use of open WiFi is only going to grow along with it.
Steal this WiFi connection!
When you steal something, there's typically a victim. With WiFi, Sophos thinks the ISPs are the victims. "Stealing WiFi Internet access may feel like a victimless crime, but it deprives ISPs of revenue," according to Sophos' senior technology consultant Graham Cluley. Furthermore, "if you've hopped onto your next door neighbors' wireless broadband connection to illegally download movies and music from the 'Net, chances are that you are also slowing down their Internet access and impacting on their download limit." In Sophos' view, then, both ISPs and everyday subscribers can be victims.
In one fell swoop, "stealing WiFi" gets mentioned in the same breath as "illegally" downloading movies and music. The fact is, people join open WiFis for all manner of reasons: to check e-mail, surf the web, look up directions to some place, etc. Those don't sound like nefarious activities, however, and certainly not activities which are likely to get someone in trouble. Of course if you run an open WAP (wireless access point) and it is heavily used for just e-mail, you could still hit your bandwidth cap (if you even have one), but that has to happen only once for that user to figure out what's up, and fix the problem. And let's be honest: it is their problem. No one forced that user to install a WAP or to leave it wide open. We'll get back to this in a minute.
The argument that using open WiFi networks deprives ISPs of significant revenue is also a red herring. Take the case of public WiFi hotspots: official hotspots aren't that difficult to find in major cities—every public library in Chicago has open WiFi, for instance. Are the public libraries and the countless other free hotspot providers helping defraud ISPs? No, they're not. There's no law that using the Internet requires payment of a fee to an ISP, and the myriad public hotspots prove this.
Really, there's only one time when you could argue that an ISP is being gypped, and that's when someone is repeatedly using his neighbor's open WiFi in lieu of paying for his own service. Is this really wrong? Let's consider some parallel examples. If the man in question were given a key and told that he could enter his neighbor's house whenever he wanted to use a PC to access the Internet, would this be wrong? Of course not. They key here (pun intended) is the "permission" given by the owner of the home. Our leeching friend would clearly be in the wrong if he were breaking into the house, of course, because he would be sidestepping something clearly set up to keep him out. If he has permission, I suppose one could argue that it's still not right, but you won't find a court that will punish such a person, nor will you find too many people thrilled at the idea that someone else can tell them who they can and can't allow into their homes for what purposes.
Some people leave their wireless access points wide open deliberately. A friend of mine and recent seminary graduate lived in a campus-owned apartment building. In addition to being a man of the cloth, Peter is a longtime Linux user and open-source advocate. While living here in Chicago, he got his DSL from Speakeasy and shared the connection with others in his building... and anyone else who needed a quick Internet fix (Speakeasy even encouraged this). He even positioned his router so that anyone in the church across the street could pick up a signal. Obviously, not everyone is like Peter. But despite easy-to-read instructions and a plethora of warnings about the need to secure your WAP, some people just can't be bothered to enable the most basic security settings.
To the person with a laptop and a sudden need to check e-mail or surf the web, it's not possible to tell who is leaving their access points open deliberately and who just plain doesn't care. The access point is there and the virtual doors are unlocked, so why not take advantage of it if you're in need?
A couple of caveats: be familiar with the law of the land. As the examples at the beginning of this story show, it's illegal to access a WAP without permission—even if it's wide open—in some places. Also, you should never use an open point for anything illegal or even unneighborly. Don't log onto the first "linksys" WAP you see and fire up a torrent for your favorite, just-released Linux distro.
And as always, don't leave your own 802.11b/g/n router wide open unless you're comfortable with random surfers using your 'Net access for their own purposes.
Open WiFi is clearly here to stay.
Tech Ping
So it is "free use for customers inside the building"? What about the patio? But the curb is off limits?
Like “free” music, man.................../s
All anyone or bsuness has to do is password protect the access point. Those providing access as a come on can chnage the password daily and have it printed on the reciept.
It ain’t hard.
The below is not true
I was walking by a bar once and saw a football game on the television inside. The closed caption was on so I didn’t need the sound. I stood there and watched the tele through the window for about five minutes.
Next thing I knew there was a swat team, police helicopters, and FBI suits arresting me for stealing television viewing without going into the bar.
Same thing. If the bar didn’t want people to watch they should have boarded or painted the windows so people outside can’t see inside. If people don’t want their WiFi leached they need to close access.
People are getting arrested for the stupidest shit these days.
Gouge away,
You can gouge away
Gouge away
All day, if you want too.
Everything is illegal unless expressly permitted.
Dennis is a card........
Utter rubbish!
A broadcast radio or TV signal is transmitted for free for all to RECEIVE. A WiFi connection is two way connection of limited bandwidth and is being paid for by someone else. The comparison ends from the moment that you TRANSMIT a request on that link and then consume some of the limited bandwidth with your transmissions and responses thereby affecting performance for the owner of the link.
BTW, go to the UK and receive a TV signal without paying for a TV licence and see if they don't prosecute you for theft
“That which is not forbidden is permitted”
It is a bit of a hassle to re-install or add to a new computer 'cause you have to look up and enter a few rows of hex$ code, but when it's done, it's safe. From then on anyone trying to access your wi-fi will need those exact hex$ digits or they are out.
It appears that a lot of people are too lazy to take advantage of this feature.
If I’m using WiFi and my connection is slowed because of the thieves, I’m not getting the performance I paid for, the thieves are getting that performance.
I keep my personal WiFi encrypted and protected and only on when I need it, so it’s not that big a deal. I up/download giant chunks of instrument data, so speed is important.
But if you are using your own setup that’s not protected, notice how slooow it gets sometimes (like when someone is downloading a movie, a CD-load of music, or a block of pictures in RAR compression.
The article seems to feel that if you leave your front door accidentally unlocked, you should not complain when your stuff is stolen.
Plus, what IP address is seen? The router, right? Not the laptop or computer node, correct me if I'm wrong on this. If it is the wireless router that is "seen" as the IP address, who gets the responsibility for illegal actions, like downloading illegal music or pictures?
This happens on my iPhone often. Our next door neighbor, apparently, uses a WiFi and when I access Safari on my iPhone, it asks if I wish to route through ***’s WiFi.
Any of our forum lawyers know if this is a crime in the U.S.?
If you don’t password protect, then it’s not really stealing.
In theory, having another computer on with you takes bandwidth and slows access. In practice, I have what amounts to an internet cafe in my house that my kids use, bringing their laptops over, and I’ve never noticed any difference.
Ah, memories of three years ago when my son and I watched the NCAA hoops title game through the window of bar in Chapel Hill. You had to have arrived by lunch time to have claimed a seat inside for the 9:00pm game.
Years ago, there was a public ad campaign admonishing people not to leave the keys in their cars ignition. “Help keep a boy from going bad” or something like that. In those days there were still plenty of people who knew what’s what, and the outcry caused the ads to be pulled.
Not anymore. Everything is turned on its head.
That password had better be encrypted, or else it would be totally useless. At home I use WPA/PSK and it seems pretty solid. The older 128 bit WEP is a joke because the key can be broken in a matter of minutes, especially using the wireless 'G' standard that has higher throughput.
what IP address is seen? The router, right?
quite right.
This is true IMO because by default most Windows machines will automatically connect when it gets in range of an open network. No user interaction is needed. How can one steal something they may not even know they have?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.