Posted on 01/03/2008 12:08:45 PM PST by xjcsa
Edited on 01/03/2008 7:30:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
I thought the time was right to start up a live thread for results and comments about tonight, so here we are!
Rush has been way too nice to Huckster. IMO.
I am very disappointed with Fox News. The next Fox News debate will include Mitt Romney, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson. Ron Paul is ahead of Giuliana in Iowa and almost tied with McCain (as of 9pm). We all know from 2004 that polls are not always correct.. Why not go with the facts?
Who does Guiliani plan to throw his support to?
Frightening,isn’t it?
CNN—They just reported screams being heard from the Clinton residence.
The Iowa reported dude said Romney could not raise money after this. What is he smoking?
They have to mention Fred. This is crazy.
I’m watching channel 8 in Ioea I think the Dems have announced Obama has won...
Hey, sw. Just saw your post.
The Huskster clan makes Billy Carter and Roger Clinton look sophisticated. :)
Yeah, but she may not get the chance.
Go, Obama, Go!
______________
Why do you want Obama to win? Do you think he’ll be easier to beat in the Presidential election?
Ed Rollins displays NO Christian virtues. He holds the top position in holy-huckabees campaign. One would think the good pastor has a better judge of character.
Rush was right on in his analysis of the huckster.
Huckabee is a one trick pony.
poor Ian almost had his cellphone number read on the air. :)
You said — “Please ST, don’t even consider this guy...You’ll live to regret it..OMG.”
Well, here’s the thing — by the time I ever get a chance to cast any kind of a vote, Huckabee will either be gone, or, he’ll be the candidate for the Republicans. I really won’t have too much to say about it, except for casting a final vote for the election.
Regards,
Star Traveler
That'a funny!! Bawahhahahaha
lots of people here will eat crow, no matter who the nominee is.
I couldn’t agree more. Very, very sad times.
Interesting how the Fredheads are gloating about Fred's "victory" with his distant third place (with numbers far behind the no. #2 candidate) showing. A few monthes ago they were talking about what a wonderful guy Fred was because he was polling second nationally "without even running ", and they hailed this as proof that Fred would be vaulted to first place the moment he actually got out there and campaigned.
The Fredheads have been talking about the "Huckabubble" and predicting it would "bust" when the "real" election rolled around and he'd be "another Howard Dean". Instead Huck just surged to a 1st place finsh and rolled over a guy who outspent him 10-to-1 in Iowa.
Looking back at "top tier" Dean's dismal third place showing in the 2004 Iowa caucus, Fred's campaign is looking more and more to be in the same situtation every day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.