Posted on 01/02/2008 10:31:10 AM PST by COUNTrecount
Was I witnessing the last throes of the 15-year-long Clinton political psychodrama in Ames, Iowa yesterday? Here’s my newspaper piece on Hillary’s final plea for support in tomorrow’s caucuses. The case she made was far from compelling – that she’s human (honest) and that she has unrivalled experience. Both propositions are debatable and she was much less compelling than Barack Obama and John Edwards have been in recent days. She seems to have had some kind of speech therapy to create a softy-soft voice that made me long for the grating shrillness of yore.
Hillary Clinton tried to present herself as softer and more human
The Obama campaign is supremely confident that victory is within its grasp. “So what?” I hear you ask. Iowa is a sparsely populated, unrepresentative state in which on the Democratic side only 124,000 people caucused in 2004. Surely it can’t matter that much? Don’t bet on it. If Hillary loses tomorrow, her presidential bid is likely to collapse like a house of cards.
For all the arguments against Iowa having such disproportionate influence – and Christopher Hitchens airs some good ones with characteristic aplomb here – it does mean that pre-packaged, calculating politicians like Hillary are scutinised and exposed (we’ll see if Mitt Romney is too).
All the money and establishment backing she had behind her couldn’t prevent her getting caught out by voters asking her about Iran and Iran, discovered planting softball questions and rumbled for having advisers forwarding smear emails about Obama. She tried to remain aloof and away from the voters but it didn’t work – if anything, the seeds of her demise (if that’s what it turns out to be) lay in that strategy.
When an incumbent-style campaign is built on a sense of inevitability, it comes under huge strain when hit by an early defeat. The bubble is burst – which is what will happen if Hillary loses Iowa to Obama in Iowa (if she loses to Edwards, the picture will be less clear).
Of course, if Hillary pulls through then it’s difficult to see how Obama and Edwards can beat her – this is absolutely their best shot. Adam Nagourney of the “New York Times” argues here that Iowa might mean nothing. That’s possible. But my hunch is that it will end up meaning everything.
Is there a new product out there that REALLY kills cockroaches?
Plus, the media will absolutely attempt to pimp their daughter on us, in less than 10 years, like the various Kennedy spawn that have managed not to get caught raping or killing any chicks.
Hillary's machine has enough money that they probably don't need to win Iowa, and they'll paint even a second-place finish as "excellent," but an Obama victory should be seen as a huge defeat for Clinton.
Plan B for Hillary is to become Senate majority leader.
I am seriously considering pulling a Democrat ballot and voting for Obama.
If he beats her here, he has a chance to drive a stake through the heart of the entire Clinton crime family.
google: Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup
Caught the end of “The Jerk” this weekend - it looks like Chelsea may have been an unfortunate victim of “Optigrab”.
There are many on FR counting their chickens before they hatch when it comes to the Clintons. These people will do anything, anywhere, anytime, to anybody, to win. They (Bill & Hill)will be the Democrat’s candidate in the general. So get use to it.
For the sake of this country and it’s future generations...I hope this is the end of this simpleton couple. They offer NOTHING...
FWIW, these have been turning up all over town. Bartenders
love them because nobody misses pee pots any more.
Kinda like Gore imitating the Gipper and his pompadour in the last election!
Not by a long shot. The Klinton's will never give up. Their money (and data base and dirty tricks) wil never run out. They (and all their goons) will go down swinging...which will suit me just fine.
In fact, it should be fun to watch. If she loses in Iowa they'll just redouble their efforts. That softness (sounded like she was over-medicated) will give way to the shrill Hill we all know and love. And then Billy-boy will feel empowered to come to the rescue and the real show will begin as he moves to commandeer (if not hijack) the campaign.
It will be pure agony. But I'll love the pain. I liken my feelings about this election to my utter disdain of the Yankees. In recent years I've taken to rooting for them to win the pennant, or at least make it into the playoffs. Then I'm caught in a quandry. Do I want to see them lose early in the playoffs? Or late? Or, God forbid, should I hope they actually make it to the World Series? If the latter, do they go down in 4 straight, absolutely humiliated? Or string out the agony only to lose in the last inning of the seventh game?
No the Klinton's are in it till the bitter end. Let the show begin. This competition will go to the World Series. Can't wait to be counting hanging chads in a Florida recount.
Maybe RFK Jr. should advise Putin on how to shoot heroin.
**Is this the end of the Clintons?**
Hopefully!
“The case she made was far from compelling – that she’s human (honest) and that she has unrivalled experience. Both propositions are debatable and she was much less compelling than Barack Obama and John Edwards have been in recent days. “
Substitute the word “preposterous” for “debatable” and the statement is more accurate.
What? No more RoboCackle (c)?
"Mother of God, it this the end of Rico?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.