Posted on 12/27/2007 4:10:27 PM PST by street_lawyer
Is Huckabee a Jimmy Carter Christian?
Recently Huckabee reportedly was unaware that the Supreme Court struck down an anti-sodomy law as being unconstitutional. How can we depend upon him to carry the social conservative banner into the next election cycle if he fails to understand one of the most basic and recent court decisions. How can we trust him to pick judges who are opposed to anal intercourse, if for no other reason than it is the most fertile infectious form of HIV transmission.
If you can vote for a man who is opposed to school choice and one who is endorsed by the National Education Association of New Hampshire, then Huckabee is your man. He does however give illegal aliens the choice to compete with US children for scholarship money. He did so because he did not want "innocent" children to be punished for the criminal activity of their parents. Perhaps Huckabee will allocate some tax revenue to pay for a fine education at one of our most prestigious boarding schools for the children of drug addicts who are imprisoned (occasionally). If you're a Huckabee supporter then you also agree that illegal immigration makes up for slavery. I don't understand the connection. Maybe someone can explain it to me.Here's a novel idea that apparently has no chance of working yet is the first thing on the Huckabee website: [commit] the resources of the federal government to the enforcement of our immigration laws.
Ok so Huckabee is a man of "faith" like Carter but according to his website he said "My faith doesn't influence my decisions" Neither does Giuliani's, so what is the difference? Giuliani will appoint judges who will not misconstrue the Constitution. Which is more then I can say for the Huckster. I support and have always supported passage of a constitutional amendment to protect the right (of the unborn to live); well isn't that just peachy Huckster?. Let's bet on the judges instead and forget about the electoral process which is about as infertile as I wish unwed mother were. He wants to overturn Roe v. Wade, but doesn't understand the Texas sodomy case Lawrence and Garner v. Texas. If it were not for the fact that anal intercourse is a very good delivery system for HIV infection, given the impracticality of policing this disgusting act, anal intercourse should not be a legislative matter, unless of course children in grammar school are instructed on how to perform this act safely. Somehow given the teacher's endorsement, I don't see the Huckster proposing any legislation that would limit teaching any form of perversion. Perhaps churchgoers can somehow figure out how to unconfuse the minds of their children while Huckabee does nothing about removing condoms from the hand-out basket at South Street Elementary School.
Socialism 101: According to the Huckster, Every child deserves a quality education, first-rate health care, decent housing in a safe neighborhood, and clean air and drinking water. Every child deserves the opportunity to discover and use his God-given gifts and talents. Apparently only public schools are capable of providing a quality education, since religious schools are not likely to demonstrate the various anal intercourse techniques. I got my first demonstration watching two dogs unable to separate. I noted that they were not same-sex unions. I also have never seen two same-sex animal unions which leads me to conclude that only in humans is there a normal variant from heterosexuals. In case you have not already discovered, I'm not opposed to homogeneous grouping, just acts which carry a high likelihood of killing a large segment of humanity. There are some acts which are so unnatural that even the Huckster should be able to comprehend them.
You better believe it! I’m getting sick to my stomach of getting sick to my stomach!
since there is only 10,000 in Hope, I suspect they are all related.
An excellent piece. Makes you realize that every one of those 25% of Iowa “Republicans” who say they support him are either totally ignorant of his record, or are complete imbeciles.
Exactly right.
The lawyer has made the “case.” Who cares if it has any basis in truth or fact?
With what has happened in Pakistan today, one would think it would be clear how important it is to honestly weigh and carefully consider the positions, character and principles of each candidate to choose the best one to lead our nation in these days. Instead we get a bunch of nonsense, misrepresentations, the gaffe of the day, and so on.
God help us.
You’re sounding a lot like the MSM, calling misinformed Christians intent on voting for Huckabee “dumb slugs.” Cute.
OH YES HE IS MORE LIBERAL THAN GEORGE BUSH. Huckabee raised taxes and hiked the state budget by 65 percent — 3X the rate of inflation. He wants to ban waterboarding and close Gitmo. HE MAKES PRESIDENT BUSH LOOK LIKE TOM TANCREDO ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.
>> Huckabee is no more liberal than GWBush.
Wrong.
Huckabee is ‘way looser than W on fiscal policy, and W is too loose.
W cut taxes. Huckster would raise taxes.
W doesn’t pardon rapists and murderers, like Huckabee did (and would).
Worst of all: W “gets it”, for the most part, on foreign policy. HUCKABEE DOESN’T. With Huckster as POTUS, bye bye US sovereignty.
But tell me, Huck suck up: what’s your point, anyway? That Huckabee is *OK? because he’s liberal??!?
Well said!
The Huckster, need anyone say anymore? ;-D
Why? Do you REALLY think the large majority of Freepers despise Huckabee because so many Freepers are anti-Christian?
>> Hatred for Huckabee is driving many FReepers mad.
Well, no, but the concept of a schmuck like Huck even running for POTUS is /making/ this freeper mad!
I love my country, and I really don’t want to see US get Hucked over.
I'll bet even a bunny could pull a 110 pound woman out of an Oldsmobile in three feet of water.
You’ll win the argument and lose the Presidency. Winsome arguments are always more effective than nastiness. Do you want to have a Thompson or Hunter as our next President? I do. But you won’t get them if you alienate those who are currently for Huckabee.
Then argue winsomely and convincingly against Huckabee. You won’t win Huckabee supporters over to your side by ridiculing them. Speak the truth in love and they’ll end up leaving Huckabee for a better candidate.
Wrath is not convincing. Truth is.
A pre-9/11 Presidential candidate
Who would have thought that we would see
A choice as weak as Huckabee?
Another Carter, who when pressed,
Might not defend the brave, free West.
“Fools rush in,” ‘tis often said.
But wimps like Huck can make us dead.
“Can a Bunny swim?”
According to Carter, yes. And they can attack you while they are swimming. But come to think of it, I don’t remember any of the Secret Service officers who were there backing him up on that.
>>Then argue winsomely and convincingly against Huckabee. You won’t win Huckabee supporters over to your side by ridiculing them. Speak the truth in love and they’ll end up leaving Huckabee for a better candidate.
You keep posting this same crap. Who do you think you’re kidding? Your schtick is “I am not a Huck supporter, but I decry the animosity of FReepers who support him yadda yadda yadda”...
Stop it already with the act. You love Huck. Just admit it.
You and others like you won’t be swayed. Very well, have him.
I have posted the truth “without ceasing” as have many others. It won’t sway Huck syncophants like you, but others reading it might, just might, look into the poseur and figure out that he’s worthless.
Huckabee ‘08!
** NO foreign policy!
** Pro-illegal aliens!
** Pro amnesty!
** Pro class warfare!
** Soft on crime!
** Pardons for murderers and rapists!
** Hard on personal freedoms!
** The HIGH TAX candidate!
** The HIGH SPENDING candidate!
** Pro Big Government!
** Supports International Carbon Credit Trading!
Only those who are lacking intellectual common sense and those numbers are few, not many. ; )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.