Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Ron Paul to make third party run on Constitution Party ticket
Modern Conservative ^
| Christopher Cook
Posted on 12/27/2007 6:02:59 AM PST by connell
ModernConservative.com has received a tip from a reliable source that may have election-shattering implications.
According to our source, an activist here in Arizona has been approached by the Ron Paul campaign; the campaign has requested that he run the Arizona effort to get Ron Paul on the general election ballot as a candidate of the Constitution Party.
Our source has requested anonymity, and we have agreed. We can, however, vouch for his/her general reliability. Our source also provided us with details that added credibility to the account. (Unfortunately, disclosure of those details would put at risk our promise of anonymity. We apologize for the unnamed sourcing and lack of further details, but those were the requirements that accompanied this revelation.)
We will keep you apprised of any new developments.
There has been a lot of analysis on the impact that Ron Paul has already had, and on the impact that he might...
(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; blameamericafirst; constitutionparty; cuckooforcocoapuffs; domesticenemy; elections; endorsedbydu; gop; heeeeeeeykoolaid; moveoncadidate; nutjob; ronniethecommie; ronpaul; ronpaulisanutjob; soros; tehronpaul; thedailykoscandidate; thirdparty; truthercandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-351 next last
To: big'ol_freeper
But, according to the paul haters here his supporters are mostly leftwing moonbats. How can that hurt the R chances?
41
posted on
12/27/2007 6:19:22 AM PST
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Global warming is the new Marxism.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Is that Huckabee running with Richard Pryor?
42
posted on
12/27/2007 6:20:12 AM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: connell
My bet is that Ronnie will draw more votes away from the Demagogue candidate than the GOP's candidate.
43
posted on
12/27/2007 6:21:45 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: samtheman
They really need a none-of-the-above on presidential ballots.That is already in place; they call it the write-in vote. If no candidate offered is acceptable, write in one who is.
44
posted on
12/27/2007 6:21:56 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
But, according to the paul haters here his supporters are mostly leftwing moonbats. How can that hurt the R chances?I've not taken part in many of the Ron Paul threads because I don't see him as a serious candidate and I do see him as a nut. I believe when "paul haters" say his support comes from "leftwing moonbats" they mean his financial support to achieve what I described...the election of the former first co-dependent or B. Hussein Obamanation.
45
posted on
12/27/2007 6:22:16 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Nomorjer Kinov
No clinton has ever been elected president by a majority of votes cast.Translation, for those of you in Rio Linda....
...a Third Party candidate is exactly what is needed to ensure Sen Clinton the White House.
46
posted on
12/27/2007 6:22:51 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I agree...if true; I don’t see this helping the Democrats at all.
47
posted on
12/27/2007 6:23:45 AM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: The_Victor
48
posted on
12/27/2007 6:23:58 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: connell
Damn, this day is just full of "good" news.
Excuse me while I hurl.
49
posted on
12/27/2007 6:24:26 AM PST
by
steveegg
(I am John Doe, and a monthly donor)
To: connell
It’ll hurt the dem’s more than us. Paul’s getting his support from the looney fringes. Not the kind of people who would vote for a GOP candidate anyway. Let him run. I hope Bloomberg runs too.
50
posted on
12/27/2007 6:24:37 AM PST
by
pgkdan
(Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
But, according to the paul haters here his supporters are mostly leftwing moonbats. How can that hurt the R chances?Ron Paul gets most of his FINANCIAL support from leftwing moonbats and most of his POLITCAL support from duped libertarians and conservatives.
Is that clear enough for you?
51
posted on
12/27/2007 6:25:33 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: CholeraJoe
I considered buying a coin just as a political memento, but I don’t want anything I purchase going to benefit his campaign in the least. I guess in a few years somebody will probably be trying to unload that stuff at pennies on the dollar, if not melting it down.
52
posted on
12/27/2007 6:25:46 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: connell
Election shattering... riiiiight.
53
posted on
12/27/2007 6:25:48 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: big'ol_freeper
The Clinton playbook again. A bogus third party populist to help a candidate who can’t get a majority vote.
54
posted on
12/27/2007 6:26:06 AM PST
by
tupac
(The Crux of the Biscuit - is the Apostrophe....)
To: pgkdan
I hope Bloomberg runs too. Watch Bloomberg throw his support behind Ron Paul.
55
posted on
12/27/2007 6:26:37 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: big'ol_freeper
56
posted on
12/27/2007 6:28:17 AM PST
by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: big'ol_freeper
I believe when "paul haters" say his support comes from "leftwing moonbats" they mean his financial support to achieve what I described...the election of the former first co-dependent or B. Hussein Obamanation. Exactly. The left is pumping up his campaign to ensure a third party candidate. That's the only way Clinton or Obama can win. The left wants PR to run 3rd party. I wish the Paulie WalNUTS would get that.
57
posted on
12/27/2007 6:28:28 AM PST
by
GOP_Proud
(I'm really tired of the Paulie WalNUTS.)
To: samtheman
I had the great misfortune to flip past Joe “Pig Eyes” Scarborough’s show on MSNBC this morning. They were grilling Rue Paul on his recent Civil War comments. They had him stumbling and stuttering, explaining and re-explaining.
58
posted on
12/27/2007 6:29:22 AM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Thompson '08)
To: connell
Ron Paul has stated he wouldn’t run on a third party ticket. This may be driven by his supporters, however, if true what’s in it for him? What would be his motivation?
He can’t seriously believe he could win, so why do it?
59
posted on
12/27/2007 6:29:59 AM PST
by
umgud
(no more subprime politicians)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
60
posted on
12/27/2007 6:31:15 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(I am unapologetically celebrating CHRISTMAS!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-351 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson