Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney: Ronald Reagan in Sacred Underwear?
The Student Operated Press ^ | December 24, 2007 | John Lillpop

Posted on 12/26/2007 7:02:35 PM PST by TheLion

Bleeding-heart types looking for a "minority cause” for which to advocate in the 2008 presidential elections are torn between the candidacies of a woman, two African- Americans, a Hispanic and a former mayor of Cleveland who is more of a communist than Vladimir Putin.

Tough choices, those, and all of them Democrats.

In the interest of fairness, however, the name of Mitt Romney should be added to the shopping list of those searching for an oppressed minority to support.

As a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), Romney is aligned with one of the most persecuted and oppressed minorities in history. Even in these enlightened times, millions of Americans say they would not vote for the charismatic ex-governor of Massachusetts under any circumstances.

And, in an amazing demonstration of religious bigotry, a New Hampshire liberal rag, the Concord Monitor, used its Sunday editorial pages to tell readers why they should not vote for Mitt Romney.

This "anti-endorsement" is unprecedented, unfair, un-American and unwise.

Editors at the Concord Monitor even went so far as to warn readers that Romney must be stopped ". . . because he lacks the core philosophical beliefs to be a trustworthy president."

IHT: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/12/23/america/Romney-Anti-Endorsement.php

That particular bit of editorial malfeasance is a thinly-veiled assault on Romney's Mormon faith, pure and simple.

Fact of the matter is that Mitt Romney is the most conservative candidate running for the White House. He is also the most experienced and qualified, a fact attested to by his service as the governor of liberal-infested Massachusetts, and by his enormously successful personal finances.

Mitt Romney knows how to work with people from diverse political backgrounds, how to overcome discrimination and adversity, and he knows how to run a large organization. No other candidate comes close to matching his qualifications for taking over the Oval Office on Ja


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cults; mittromney; romney; romney2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 401 next last
To: Petronski
Thanks for the ping, I think. I really learned some things. I had no idea that Mormons were one of the most persecuted and oppressed minorities in history. I never saw any of my Mormon neighbors persecuted. Everyone always spoke/speaks well of them. I thought that Jews pretty well had a lock on "the most persecuted" title.

I also learned that Mitt is a conservative. I had no idea. You could have knocked me over with a feather.

301 posted on 12/27/2007 6:19:34 AM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Hey, it’s a curse. I’m still giggling about “the mud flap.” My ribs are getting sore.


302 posted on 12/27/2007 6:23:10 AM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Rock&RollRepublican
How dare you equate that flip-flopping lying phony with Reagan ... Yeah, how insulting to equate someone with a politician who proposed Amnesty for millions of illegals, and voted tax increases of historic proportions on Social Security, and signed into law a government funded abortion program... Ooops. That WAS Ronald Reagan who did all those things.

Reagan has gotten a bum rap for decades for allegedly flip-flopping on abortion. As California governor, Reagan signed a bill which permitted abortions for "health" reasons. He and the legislature were both assured that it would only permit abortions in a few very unique circumstances where the mother was suffering severe physical trauma from the pregnancy. After the bill became law, judges "interpreted" the word "health" to mean virtually anything, such as mental stress, and the result was abortion-on-demand. But that was not Reagan's intention. He never described himself as "pro-choice" and at no point in his career ever supported an abortion legalization proposal except for that one bill, which was misinterpreted afterward by the courts and would have only permitted a handful of hard circumstance abortions per year if applied properly.

On amnesty, Reagan agreed to it after being told there were three million illegals in the country and that a one-time amnesty would be justifiable if afterward we cracked down and didn't let any more come in. The problem there was that once Bush I took office, followed by Clinton and Bush II, there was no effort to protect the borders and we now have 12 to 20 million illegals here.

Reagan made some mistakes, but he learned from them. As president, he fought efforts by Congress to add a "health" provision to the Hyde Amendment, because he had learned that that word would be perverted by the courts. Had he remained in office, he would never have supported another blanket amnesty.

303 posted on 12/27/2007 6:32:07 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: TheLion; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; ...
TheLion: Our whole history has been filled with religious persecution. I doubt it will ever stop. The left started this one and those that don’t like Romney have run with it.

The mormon identity has been steeped in the mantra of "persecution" for over 150 years. It's proclaimed from the pulpit and sung about in mormon hymns to this day. Mormon plays are perfomed commemorating "victim" occurences in mormon history.

A response to Gordon B. Hinckley's The Mormons' Trail of Hope

The "Victim" hair shirt is as much a part of the mormon garb as the temple garments. You can see it being flourished daily on threads on FR in the continual howls of "bigot","hater", "liar" and calls for censorship whenever Romney is questioned or factual mormon dogma or history is presented.

304 posted on 12/27/2007 6:34:52 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney, fooled TWICE by a Columbian gardener...what kind of discernment for POTUS is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
At the time, I wasn’t aware of of Guiliani’s social stances....they are unelectable, so I switched.

You've been here on FR since 1998..and you didn't know????

305 posted on 12/27/2007 7:13:29 AM PST by Osage Orange (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
National Review

Our guiding principle has always been to select the most conservative viable candidate. In our judgment, that candidate is Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts.

 In the months before announcing his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts contributed tens of thousands of dollars of his personal fortune to several conservative groups in a position to influence his image on the right.

Last December, a foundation controlled by Mr. Romney made contributions of $10,000 to $15,000 to each of three Massachusetts organizations associated with major national conservative groups: the antiabortion Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Massachusetts Citizens for Limited Taxation and the Christian conservative Massachusetts Family Institute.

Mr. Romney and a group of his supporters also contributed a total of about $10,000 to a nonprofit group affiliated with National Review. Over the past two years, he contributed $35,000 to the Federalist Society, an influential network of conservative lawyers. And in December 2005, he contributed $25,000 to the Heritage Foundation, a leading conservative research organization.

The recipients of Mr. Romney’s donations said the money had no influence on them. But some of the groups, notably Citizens for Life and the Family Institute, have turned supportive of Mr. Romney after criticizing him in the past.

Coming on the eve of his presidential campaign, Mr. Romney’s contributions could create the appearance of a conflict of interest for groups often asked to evaluate him. All the groups said he had never contributed before, and his foundation’s public tax filings show no previous gifts to similar groups. Its 2006 contributions will become public with its tax filings later this year.

In Romney’s Bid, His Wallet Opens to the Right


306 posted on 12/27/2007 7:14:52 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney, fooled TWICE by a Columbian gardener...what kind of discernment for POTUS is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Fred

LOL, how tacky!


307 posted on 12/27/2007 7:18:58 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney, fooled TWICE by a Columbian gardener...what kind of discernment for POTUS is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
You might get banned for uttering the words magic socks. Be careful. I think people like GOP_Lady like to wear the magic stuff, which goes along with their Kool Aid, whether they are Mormon or not.

Well, I'm still here and I've uttered many things about socks in the past.

Let's see how this works.

Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.
Magic socks.

308 posted on 12/27/2007 7:28:39 AM PST by Allegra (HOME for the Holidays! Merry Christmas to my "family" back in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou; Saundra Duffy
There you are with that same stupid question again. You're so tiresome.

Saundra is just trying to drum up hits for her claim to fame, a long-dead thread about the horrible persecution she suffered from the Baptists just because she is, (gasp) mormon!. IIRC, someone wouldn't let her husband pray at some function or other.

It ended up being a wonderful opportunity for FReepers to post huge amounts of facts about mormon dogma and practices, and didn't hurt the Baptists at all. ;)

309 posted on 12/27/2007 7:34:11 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney, fooled TWICE by a Columbian gardener...what kind of discernment for POTUS is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
That's obscene.

If you want the most persecuted and oppressed minorities, I have a short list:

Jews
Blacks
Armenians
Slavs

You seem to have a very selective list. When have Jews, Armenians and Slavs been persecuted in our country? I would think Indians would top the list followed by Mormons and Blacks.

310 posted on 12/27/2007 7:41:48 AM PST by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady; Blue Highway; humblegunner
But it is sincere, honest (and not hateful) criticism of a candidate. /sarcasm
311 posted on 12/27/2007 7:44:49 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande

He didn’t specify “our country.” He said “in history.”


312 posted on 12/27/2007 7:47:15 AM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
He didn’t specify “our country.” He said “in history.”

I think it is a safe bet that he was talking about our history : )

By your 'history' standard not even the people that you listed rank in the top ten of the most persecuted.

313 posted on 12/27/2007 7:57:02 AM PST by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
"The most conservative of conservative republicans, now magically become liberals when they support Romney. /sarcasm "

I explained this to two staunch conservative members of my family (also Romney supporters) when visiting with them on Christmas day. We laughed. : )

314 posted on 12/27/2007 7:58:50 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande
I think it is a safe bet that he was talking about our history

It is not what he said.

By your 'history' standard not even the people that you listed rank in the top ten of the most persecuted.

Like hell.

315 posted on 12/27/2007 8:01:10 AM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

You aren’t the least bit funny, but you are vicious, Elsie. And most people see it.


316 posted on 12/27/2007 8:05:24 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

I see the “lack of class” by some posters here as well.


317 posted on 12/27/2007 8:08:19 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

That’s not the picture that I was talking about.


318 posted on 12/27/2007 8:14:05 AM PST by Graybeard58 ( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande
"I would think Indians would top the list followed by Mormons and Blacks."

Slavs were never welcomed with open arms in this country, but neither were many other groups. That said, being one half Slavic, I'd say you were right!

Mormons are one of the most persecuted groups in American history. What my Slavic grandparents endured, upon their arrival to this country, wasn't even close to what Mormons have had to endure.

319 posted on 12/27/2007 8:15:32 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Class???? What is that? : )


320 posted on 12/27/2007 8:18:49 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 401 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson