Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee campaigning for 23% sales tax
The Los Angeles Times ^ | December 24, 2007 | Janet Hook

Posted on 12/24/2007 7:55:05 AM PST by Alex Murphy

WASHINGTON — Mike Huckabee, one of the most conservative Republicans in the 2008 presidential race, has embraced one of the most radical ideas on the campaign trail: a plan to abolish all federal income and payroll taxes and replace them with a single 23% national sales tax.

The idea -- dubbed the "fair tax" by proponents -- has been a political asset for Huckabee; its well-organized backers have helped catapult him from the back of the presidential pack to its top tier.

Sales tax proponents have tapped into seething voter hostility toward the Internal Revenue Service to become a below-the-radar political force, popping up at campaign events and candidate forums in Iowa and elsewhere.

The efforts on Huckabee's behalf by sales tax advocates helped spur his surprise second-place showing in an August Iowa straw poll -- the breakthrough that marked the beginning of his rise in the state and nationwide.

He is the only major presidential candidate to make the idea central to his campaign. "The first thing I'd love to do as president: Put a 'going out of business' sign on the Internal Revenue Service," he said at one debate.

Some wonder, however, whether his embrace of the plan eventually could turn into a liability.

The sales tax proposal has been around for years but languished on the fringes of practical politics and policy. Tax professionals generally regard the idea as impractical, regressive and even "crackpot," as one critic puts it.

It has gone nowhere in Congress. The 2005 Presidential Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform soundly rejected the idea. And many politicians shy away from it because it is easy for opponents to portray it as a huge tax increase -- as Democrats did in a 2006 Senate race in South Carolina.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; fairtax; huckabee; regressivetax; taxes; vat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 841-850 next last
To: wayoverthehill
But he also makes 5 times the income I ever did in my whole lifetime so he should be smart enough to save a good chunk of it. I tried to teach him to do so.

That's ok, for your GRANDson will make 25 times what you have!

It's all relative.

The money is gone because...

1. They started giving it away to people it was NEVER intended for, and...

2. Abortion has wiped out a large portion of the ones the original designers of the system had COUNTED ON to put the money in!

361 posted on 12/24/2007 4:27:29 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Tatze

[The FairTax eliminates all those different taxes, and replaces them with one national 23% sales tax. PLUS, you get a prebate check for the amount of taxes expected to be paid by a family at a poverty level income.]

AND IN THEORY I’m as fair as a 16 year old maiden.

What would happen in reality is that the Democrats would us this excuse to mash the system even worse so would get the evils of both worlds. The IRS will NEVER go away short of an armed conflict. Fair Tax means a VAT PLUS and income tax PLUS capital gains, etc.

How bout we just keep the current tax cuts on the books before jousting at windmills.


362 posted on 12/24/2007 4:29:25 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
No, they will never get it.
(Therefore the nrst/fairtax/consumption tax is truly a “permission to live” tax - you must spend to live, therefore you must pay the tax - they will never care how you got the money, or how many times it has already been taxed, just that they get their tax)

Now, extrapolate this a little... what items does (or can) the government control prices on (and therefore raise)?? - basic necessities - but they try to hide this behind the socialist prebate scheme....

The 'milk cartels" come to mind, and gasoline, and grain, and....

363 posted on 12/24/2007 4:30:24 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
No; my comment stands - I’ve seen nothing “fun & civil” in your posts at all but lots of bitterness and attacking.

I haven’t seen you post a pornographic picture ... did I miss something or was that more “fun and civility”???

364 posted on 12/24/2007 4:31:47 PM PST by baybabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Ah, but you’ve missed the point completely. That $100 of goods (under the income tax system) will now be $90 ... and you don’t pay an added tax of $30. Your effective tax rate would be something like 11% so you’d pay a total of $100 (tax inclusive) - and you only pay that if the item is taxable.
365 posted on 12/24/2007 4:31:48 PM PST by baybabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: mylife
23%? Fair?

No, that's not fair. Fair would be to return our federal government back to its constitutional size and support it with about a 10% tax. But, the idea behind the Fair Tax is a great idea; tax consumption and quit taxing production. Also, it would make it a huge political liability for congress to ever raise taxes again because a tax raise would no longer be hidden in back room deals and it would affect EVERYBODY, rich, black, white, poor, hispanic, etc.

366 posted on 12/24/2007 4:35:59 PM PST by MichiganWoodsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: baybabe
OK.. you won't read it correctly, that's OK. As for civility... in the last FT/Huckster thread, there were 326 or so post, and a full 28% of them were overt personal insults and attacks on the voices of reason, so believe what you will.

If you believe in the FT, you'll most likely believe anything.

367 posted on 12/24/2007 4:36:34 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: baybabe

With the FairTax, income isn’t taxed - only certain qualifying consumption.
************************************************************
I Won’t capitalize,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I don’t have any income. I planned it that way,,,,,,,,,,,,,
to NOT pay taxes. I paid my taxes. I paid my taxes, I paid my taxes.

But now you want me to throw out all my planning and pay taxes again, some more and on money which has already been TAXED.

Tell me where I went wrong. Besides lying about two capitalized words.


368 posted on 12/24/2007 4:38:57 PM PST by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: wayoverthehill

“I still think a flat tax is a better solution”

The problem with a flat tax is that it is typically applied to income of people that work for a living. Those living off interest or capital gains or donations or family wealth do not pay any taxes at all. Yet they get all the benefits of a working person. I don’t think that is fare or good economics. We need to make sure that everybody pays.


369 posted on 12/24/2007 4:41:20 PM PST by Sunnyflorida (Drill in the Gulf of Mexico/Anwar, etc and we can join OPEC!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida

Why should only the old people get a refund? That is my point. Open your brain. Don’t get caught up in the libs plan to divide us. With Fair Tax you do not pay on the money you have or the income it generates. Do you understand that? It is pretty basic.
**************************************************************
OK, your plan is for me to not spend one penny of my already taxed money. Ahhhhhh,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
how do I get thru retirement without spending what I saved??????
Like I said you are an advocate for double taxation on savings. And why stop there. If I have too much in savings then make it easier on somebody else by halving it.


370 posted on 12/24/2007 4:44:00 PM PST by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

I rather stick with the IRS and make the IRS even more of a burden on the American taxpayers...
*ducks for cover*


371 posted on 12/24/2007 4:44:13 PM PST by yield 2 the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Fair Tax is a Ponzi scheme for those at the top....


372 posted on 12/24/2007 4:46:24 PM PST by yield 2 the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
Passage of the FairTax would represent the greatest transfer of power from Washington back to the people in the history of this nation!

You are exactly right on this! Then, when the country is in economically down times, the government will be forced to spend the same way. This tax replacement is the best idea, period. And, if the mass public dislikes spending programs and other wastes that make it to where we need a 23% sales tax, then the people now will demand en masse to lower it and to stop the welfare programs. The fair tax is a win-win for our great nation.

373 posted on 12/24/2007 4:48:45 PM PST by MichiganWoodsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: baybabe
One thing of note... freeper date 1/2007 - only one posting on one thread ever anytime before this one, and that was back in august, and now you seem to be a "foremost authority" on fairtax thread history..... very interesting... and how could Principled possibly confuse a non existent post made to you, when you weren't even on FR when it allegedly happened... even more interesting....
374 posted on 12/24/2007 4:51:22 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Allen In So Cal

You are NOT paying attention. Under my plan EVERYBODY pays taxes. Why is this hard for you to understand? I do not care how you get/got your money. You want to live in the country without paying your fair share?

If everybody paid the same believe me the total taxes taken would be a fraction of what they are today.


375 posted on 12/24/2007 4:55:27 PM PST by Sunnyflorida (Drill in the Gulf of Mexico/Anwar, etc and we can join OPEC!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: MichiganWoodsman

Try telling that to those here that say it is a tax on INCOME. Which it isnt if its put in as it is intended.

BTW where in Mich are you a woodsman? UP? or below the bridge?


376 posted on 12/24/2007 4:57:53 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: wayoverthehill

I want to point out that you see the employer and the employee are both coughing up half. It’s still a combined figure (tax total that the government is busy collecting)for that individual to be employed for another. If it was a flat tax, it would stop the need for an underground economy...


377 posted on 12/24/2007 5:04:45 PM PST by Issaquahking (N.H. FNC Debate "What did you do for America today?" Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

it’s better said that for small business “the employee pays the full amount, and the owner pays double...”


378 posted on 12/24/2007 5:08:24 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: MichiganWoodsman
The elephant in the corner is that during the mass confusion of the changeover, the economic enemies of the US could easily take our economy to is knees, and we’d all be happy as hell in our new 3rd world country with it’s pretty little tax package... and no one consuming enough of anything to matter anymore.
379 posted on 12/24/2007 5:12:11 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida

You are NOT paying attention. Under my plan EVERYBODY pays taxes. Why is this hard for you to understand? I do not care how you get/got your money. You want to live in the country without paying your fair share?
**************************************************************
And I was told that if I carefully did X, Y and Z that the taxes I paid on the money in the bank would not be taxed again.

You and others have convinced yourselves that this tax will, will, will solve some problems. Maybe it will.
But it is a disgraceful and despicable solution for those that played by the rules only to have the rug pulled out from underneath them. It has no chance of acceptance without a major accommodation that prevents double taxation.


380 posted on 12/24/2007 5:15:27 PM PST by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 841-850 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson