To: Toddsterpatriot
Ah, but you’ve missed the point completely. That $100 of goods (under the income tax system) will now be $90 ... and you don’t pay an added tax of $30. Your effective tax rate would be something like 11% so you’d pay a total of $100 (tax inclusive) - and you only pay that if the item is taxable.
365 posted on
12/24/2007 4:31:48 PM PST by
baybabe
To: baybabe
That $100 of goods (under the income tax system) will now be $90 ... and you dont pay an added tax of $30.In that case, 30% would be $27.
381 posted on
12/24/2007 5:16:29 PM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
To: baybabe; Toddsterpatriot
Ah, but youve missed the point completely. That $100 of goods (under the income tax system) will now be $90 ... and you dont pay an added tax of $30. Your effective tax rate would be something like 11% so youd pay a total of $100 (tax inclusive) - and you only pay that if the item is taxable.
Care to show how your little dream adds up to be revenue neutral?
According to the Fairtax rhetoric I would have to earn $130 to purchase the $100 item, and, according to the Fairtax rhetoric 23% of that $100 item is embedded taxes.
That means that so far the total amount of tax collected under the income tax is $53.00
Your dream scenario only collected $10...where's the other $43 to be revenue neutral?
412 posted on
12/24/2007 10:06:04 PM PST by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson