Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY! UNCENSORED: Rudy Giuliani and FOX reporter Carl Cameron have the DVD
conversation with Katherin Prudhomme O'Brien ^ | 12-23-07 | dfu

Posted on 12/23/2007 10:18:32 PM PST by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: LachlanMinnesota

The trial judges used as rationale California’s “anti-SLAPP” law, the intent of which is to protect politicians from frivolous lawsuits during campaigns. We think the law was improperly applied. The CA appellate court would not allow in the appeal the video evidence that had been withheld by a US Attorney (or an assistant US Attorney). That person may be deposed along with the Clinton-appointed federal judge who ran interference for Hillary during the Rosen trial.


41 posted on 12/24/2007 9:00:12 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: duckln

“and just to watch them with no comment as to their content from the posters is an idiots game.”

DFU has been working on this for a long time.

He has posted tons of threads with transcripts of the conversations in the video. With tons of still photos of evidence.

You can use FR’s SEARCH feature to find all of this.

Countless threads have been started where posters discussed the pro’s and con’s of this issue. Where they discussed the upcoming testimony trial featuring many Hollywood personalities and Chelsea Clinton.

This thread was just a mention about the release of the latest ‘unedited’ version of HILLARY UNCENSORED!

DFU has been awake, and very,very busy.

You are the one sleeping, and want to blame others because you are ‘new’ to the subject.

The bottom line is that HILLARY COMMITTED PERJURY and LARGE SCALE CAMPAIGN FUNDING VIOLATIONS, and it’s all on TAPE.

Merry Christmas, to you, friends, and family.


42 posted on 12/24/2007 9:07:48 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MHT

“So what’s on the Hillary video?”

Proof that the Clinton’s are not only criminals, but back-stabbing criminals, who would ruin a new business partner to steal his money after he paid for a political donor event, in excess of campaign laws.

Hillary then committed perjury and denied even knowing who Peter Paul was.

The video has taped proof Hillary LIED.


43 posted on 12/24/2007 9:14:21 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sono
And I just bought a CD as a Christmas present. Johnny Cash's 16 greatest hits. Includes Ring of Fire, Walk the Line, Man in Black and my favorite, Sunday Morning Sidewalk.

Bump

44 posted on 12/24/2007 9:36:16 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Good one Doug.


45 posted on 12/24/2007 2:25:16 PM PST by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

The video shows if you tell the truth about Hillary you wind up in solitary confinement in Brazil. It also shows a Clinton can be brought up on criminal charges, suborne purgery and never become a headline in the US.


46 posted on 12/24/2007 2:40:04 PM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Hillary is going to be under oath before the election in Paul v Clinton."
Doug. Can you specifically indicate for those of us not in the position to be following this stuff, just where the beast along with her cronies are going to have to testify?
Are we talking about a full blown trial coming up regarding this campaign fraud she participated in?
47 posted on 12/24/2007 5:31:55 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Maybe their is justice in the world after all.

What a great treat it would be for me to see HC in jail where she belongs.

John


48 posted on 12/24/2007 5:44:52 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Rudy is the only one we can count on to use this in the election. Mitt and the other guys are too nice and timid to go for the throat like Rudy.

We can put this bitch under the jail but its going to take a fighter to do it. We can’t count on the media to do it.

Rudy is the only guy that will see it through.

John


49 posted on 12/24/2007 5:47:11 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

What does suborne mean???


50 posted on 12/24/2007 9:07:18 PM PST by herecomesthesun ("...and that’s what I’m going to try to do as President again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Doug, put this in the hands of the FOREIGN PRESS...PIAPS can not control them and they love juicy stuff like this.
51 posted on 12/24/2007 9:16:08 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: herecomesthesun
What does suborne mean???

Sorry. It is spelled suborn (without an "e").

According to dictionary.com it means:

suborn: /səˈbɔrn/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-bawrn] (v)

1. to bribe or induce (someone) unlawfully or secretly to perform some misdeed or to commit a crime.

2. Law. a. to induce (a person, esp. a witness) to give false testimony.

b. to obtain (false testimony) from a witness.


52 posted on 12/25/2007 12:19:18 PM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

Very good—thank you...I obviously could have looked it up myself or figured it out, but I was just teasing you for using fancy words like suborn.

Is this case definitely going to trial? It would be wonderful if it destroyed Hillary and Bill’s career.

Merry Xmas and Happy New Year!


53 posted on 12/25/2007 7:32:13 PM PST by herecomesthesun ("...and that’s what I’m going to try to do as President again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bttt


54 posted on 12/25/2007 7:40:52 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
More evidence that Rudy is in cahoots with Fox News.

Say what??

55 posted on 12/25/2007 7:45:01 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Fox and the NY Post shill for Rudy, IMHO.


56 posted on 12/25/2007 7:54:49 PM PST by Clemenza (I NO Heart Huckabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Hillary is going to be under oath before the election in Paul v Clinton. Also to be grilled are defendant Bill, Chelsea, Gore, Rendell, Wolfson, Craighead, Gray Davis, Larry King, Cher, and Streisand.
Hey, it'll just be free publicity for (as Clinton supporters will see it) another "Republican smear campaign". But who cares about them?
57 posted on 12/27/2007 5:01:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson