Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA denies California's bid to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 12/19/07 | Ken Thomas and Erica Werner - ap

Posted on 12/19/2007 3:56:08 PM PST by NormsRevenge

The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday slapped down California's bid for first-in-the-nation greenhouse gas limits on cars, trucks and SUVs, denying a request for a waiver that would have allowed those restrictions to take effect.

"The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution - not a confusing patchwork of state rules - to reduce America's climate footprint from vehicles," EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson said in a statement.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: automakers; california; denies; emissions; epa; globalwarming; greenhousegas; reduce

1 posted on 12/19/2007 3:56:10 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


Good, sort of...
2 posted on 12/19/2007 3:57:48 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Lots of other emissions in CA tho.


3 posted on 12/19/2007 3:57:54 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The poor, tortured Commerce Clause, no doubt.


4 posted on 12/19/2007 4:00:16 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Lots of other emissions in CA tho.

Yes, the stench from the east (Sacra-pimento) is getting worse than that from the south (Los Mexicos) these days. The Governator has either forgotten how to be a conservative, or he's been effectively eunuched by the one-party government that is our state assembly and senate these days.

I keep telling myself that it would have been worse with Gray-out Davis and L. Ron Gore in charge, as opposed to Ah-nold and the Shrub, but it's getting more and more difficult to believe it!

5 posted on 12/19/2007 4:02:48 PM PST by ssaftler (Which Al is more deadly: Al Qaeda or Al Gore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Beer and soft drinks emit prodigous quantities of CO2


6 posted on 12/19/2007 4:06:03 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

full article, same authors, different title

EPA denies Calif. greenhouse gas waiver

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071220/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/california_greenhouse_gases_6
WASHINGTON - The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday slapped down California’s bid for first-in-the-nation greenhouse gas limits on cars, trucks and SUVs, denying a request for a waiver that would have allowed those restrictions to take effect.

“The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution — not a confusing patchwork of state rules,” EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson told reporters on a conference call. “I believe this is a better approach than if individual states were to act alone.”

The long-awaited decision amounted to a serious setback for California and 16 other states seeking the new car regulations to achieve their anti-global warming goals.

At issue were tailpipe standards California adopted in 2004 that would have forced automakers to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent in new cars and light trucks by 2016, with the cutbacks beginning in the 2009 model year.

The state needed a federal waiver to implement the rules.

Twelve other states — Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington — have adopted the California emissions standards, and the governors of Arizona, Colorado, Florida and Utah have said they also plan to adopt them.

With the denial, those other states are also prevented from moving forward.

In explaining his decision, Johnson cited energy legislation approved by Congress and signed into law Wednesday by President Bush. The law requires automakers to achieve an industrywide average fuel efficiency for cars, SUVs and small trucks of 35 miles per gallon by 2020 — the first increase in the federal requirement in 32 years.

That law “achieves the greatest greenhouse reductions in the history of the United States,” Johnson said, and is preferable to a state-by-state approach.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and other officials in the state denounced the decision, and the governor’s office said the state will appeal it.

“Gov. Schwarzenegger is extremely disappointed in today’s decision by the EPA and will continue to press for action. He is committed to getting this done for California with or without the support of the administration,” said spokesman Adam Mendelsohn.

The decision was further confirmation of the Bush administration’s adamant opposition to mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, even after a string of court decisions affirming the right of states and the federal government to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

It was the first time the EPA had fully denied California a Clean Air Act waiver since Congress gave California the right to obtain such waivers in 1967.


7 posted on 12/19/2007 4:17:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

It seems like the same reasoning that they use on the illegal immigration front. This is a federal issue, and states can’t interfere with what the federal government is supposed to do (even when the federal government doesn’t do anything)


8 posted on 12/19/2007 6:18:17 PM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

It seems like the same reasoning that they use on the illegal immigration front. This is a federal issue, and states can’t interfere with what the federal government is supposed to do (even when the federal government doesn’t do anything)


9 posted on 12/19/2007 6:18:18 PM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; tubebender; editor-surveyor; AuntB

Hallelujah!!!


10 posted on 12/19/2007 7:20:15 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/8353/

12/19/2007   GAAS:969:07   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   

Governor Schwarzenegger Issues Statement after U.S. EPA Rejects California’s Tailpipe Emissions Waiver Request

Governor Schwarzenegger today issued the following statement after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), after nearly two years of delay, rejected California's request to regulate tailpipe emissions from passenger cars and light trucks.  Over the past year, the Governor has lobbied the federal government, meeting and sending letters to both President Bush and USEPA Administrator Johnson.  Last month, the Governor announced California's lawsuit against the agency for failing to act.   Today, he vowed to appeal the decision and pursue every legal opportunity to obtain the waiver.

"While the federal energy bill is a good step toward reducing dependence on foreign oil, the President's approval of it does not constitute grounds for denying our waiver.   The energy bill does not reflect a vision, beyond 2020, to address climate change, while California's vehicle greenhouse gas standards are part of a carefully designed, comprehensive program to fight climate change through 2050," said Governor Schwarzenegger.  

"California has a long and proud history of leadership in reducing pollution and fighting for clean air.  Our citizens place a high priority on good health and a clean environment, and we are ready to implement the nation's cleanest standards for vehicle emissions.  It has been nearly two years since we requested the waiver and, now, sixteen other states are following our lead to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, increase fuel efficiency and help reduce harmful greenhouse gases.  A ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year made it clear that the USEPA has the authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.

"It is disappointing that the federal government is standing in our way and ignoring the will of tens of millions of people across the nation. We will continue to fight this battle.  California sued to compel the agency to act on our waiver, and now we will sue to overturn today's decision and allow Californians to protect our environment."  

Under the Federal Clean Air Act, California has the right to set its own tougher-than-federal vehicle emission standards, as long as it obtains a waiver from USEPA.  Over the past 30 years the USEPA has granted California more than 40 such waivers, denying none.

The original request for a waiver of federal preemption of California's Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards was made by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) on December 21, 2005. The waiver, allowing California to enact and enforce emissions standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles, was requested after the Air Resources Board developed regulations based on a 2002 California law, AB 1493 by Assemblymember Fran Pavley.

That law required California to establish new standards for motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions beginning in model year 2009. The ARB-adopted regulations will phase in and ramp up over eight years to cut global warming emissions from new vehicles by nearly 30 percent by model year 2016.

By implementing these standards, California would be eliminating greenhouse gases equivalent to taking 6.5 million cars off the road by the year 2020.  If all the other states with similar plans follow through, that figure would grow to nearly 22 million vehicles and would cut gasoline consumption by an estimated 11 billion gallons a year.

In letters sent on April 10, 2006 and October 24, 2006 to President Bush, the Governor reiterated the urgency of approving California's request to address global warming.  On April 25, 2007, 16 months after the original waiver request, Governor Schwarzenegger sent a letter to Administrator Johnson informing him of California's intent to sue after 180 days under the Clean Air Act and Administrative Procedure Act, which provides mechanisms for compelling delayed agency action.

California's request has been supported by recent judicial decisions. In September, a court decision in Vermont confirmed that states do have the ability to adopt California's motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards. Sixteen states, comprising about 45 percent of all U.S. auto sales have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, California's standards.

In the Vermont case, the judge dismissed the argument by automobile manufacturers that they could not comply with the California-based regulation because the technology was out of reach and that it would cost too much. The Vermont decision came on the heels of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last April saying the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

States that have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, California's strict automobile emissions standards are: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont and Washington. 


11 posted on 12/19/2007 7:26:13 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; All
"Hallelujah!!!"

But, but, but... What about the 10th Amendment and state's rights and federalism, huh??? Have you now joined the FR Holy Rollers and Evangelicals with them Hallelujahs???

Just kidding!!! But I gotta admit, when I see what the celebrity does as opposed to what he first said at that summer of 2003 Repub national CONvention, I keep asking myself... WWJD? (What Would Judas Do?)

This new law just signed today and Schwartzenegger's stupidity trying to start a revolt throughout the planet just makes me think I'm watching Bevis and Butthead, or else Dumb and Dumber!!!

This is NOT Republican, conservative, or even American common sense, for that matter... It's just an exercise in politickle futility!!! (and it will trash the American Auto Industry once and for all time!!!)

Maybe Putin will bring back the Russian Lada... The Cubans and Jamaicans sure liked them smelly two stroke engines that smoke like hell!!! Specially with their 57 Chevys with their muscley V-8's finally gave out!!!

12 posted on 12/19/2007 9:13:22 PM PST by SierraWasp (Too much religion mixed with politics just leads the participants into too much hate & discontent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bush

Wins

Again

For

America!


13 posted on 12/19/2007 9:17:20 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
What about the 10th Amendment and state's rights and federalism, huh??? Have you now joined the FR Holy Rollers and Evangelicals with them Hallelujahs???

Hmmmm... maybe with the Paulites to abolish the EPA? ;-)

Nah... I'm just for common sense. And I ain't buyin' Arnold's definition of "pollution" or the manner in which he wants to chase every productive element out of the state and the U.S.A.!

V-8.... ahhhh... memories of my '67 Camaro. :-)

14 posted on 12/19/2007 9:28:09 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Thank you!


15 posted on 12/20/2007 11:31:46 AM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™ ping~~


16 posted on 01/01/2008 12:04:11 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson