Posted on 12/19/2007 10:43:56 AM PST by goldstategop
Carbon Credit Pledge
I pledge not to breathe, eat or reproduce
for as long as I live on mother earth.
Now that is my kind of thinking. The ultimate aim of the enviro-weenies is the elimination of huge populations of humans on this planet through the rationing of energy. The Left, and the Culture of Death that they promote, are the new sacred cow. With this sacred cow, they will take mankind to a new Dark Age of human existence. They are fighting the Western Culture of Life using the pseudoscience of Global Warming.
This is why I call the Left the Culture of Death. The members of this cult are Zombies from the Dawn of the Dead whose "bite" turns the sane into psychotic maniacs. The viral replication of this culture is reaching toxic proportions. They have ruined everything they have touched. Our institutions have been trashed, the social order is undermined by their relativistic morality, and they live in a fantasy world that has total contempt for reality. When they make policy, it is with the most contempt for their fellow man who they see as peons for their haut monde.
POGW ping
Leftists don’t need to have children; they indoctrintate all the liberal voters they need in the schools, or let them flood over the border, ready-made.
Which is why people ought to home school, or send their kids to private schools, so we can cut them off from our children.
You are right!
Yes, indeed. All the subliminal implications are hilarious (Hill-arious?).
That was the money quote!
They're not too happy about the illegals leaving their trash all over the land they cross.
A new Club flyer asks: "What does Population have to do with the Environment?" It answers: "Everything." A rapidly growing population means more polluting coal burned to generate electricity, more imported oil, more forests clearcut to provide construction materials, more farms, wetlands and natural landscapes developed into endless sprawling subdivisions, roads, and strip malls. Every Club objective is frustrated by population spiraling out of control.
From 2000-2004 US population grew by 12 million: immigration was 5.3 million and births to immigrants were 4 million. Should the United States therefore close its doors to all immigrants? Should we wall ourselves off from those fleeing persecution? Of course not. This ballot question suggests no such thing. It simply adopts policy recommended in 1988 by the Club's Population and Conservation Committees. It doesn't change priorities or reallocate resources.
The Club's current approach of improving conditions in foreign countries to reduce migration pressures has been in place for nine years. Yet population growth here is faster than ever! We should redouble efforts to improve the lives of those in impoverished places. But this is not enough. Our government must develop a comprehensive population policy, or we soon will become another India or China, a nation swelling with humanity.
Our working poor are the first to suffer as an overflowing labor supply depresses wages. Yet the poor cannot escape the crowding, pollution, and high costs of overpopulated areas. Future generations - who have no voice in current policies - are the ultimate victims.
Our poor and disadvantaged, disproportionately minorities, have shown in poll after poll that they oppose mass migration, especially illegal immigration. And the media - see cover stories in Time, Los Angeles Times Magazine and Environment Magazine - can talk openly and honestly about such problems. But our Club cannot under current policy.
In 2000, Club hero David Brower said, "Overpopulation is perhaps the biggest problem facing us, and immigration is part of the problem. It has to be addressed."
Please read the ballot question carefully. It's a modest but needed change for sustainability. Please vote "yes."
~~AGW ping~~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.