Posted on 12/19/2007 10:43:56 AM PST by goldstategop
Well sure, killing all the people to save the planet would seem rational to an eco-nut. That’s why I think it’s conceivable.
What if the eco-bomber made a bio weapon instead of letter bombs? Much bigger bang for the buck.
When President Bush was reelected, they started calling for the secession of the Blue States from the Union. When an organization goes against what the ultra-Liberals want, the ultra-Liberals want to destroy that organization. In the case of man made Global Warming, that organization is mankind. Eventually, they will want to exterminate humanity.
Ping!
Bingo! That is the real agenda behind the agenda.
Good article.
For our own good, of course.
Every time I try to point out to them that we live in a dynamic vibrant ecosystem that has yet to even begin to reveal its secrets and mysteries they curse me as naive. Even after I remind them that I am a scientist, I don't play one on TV and I don't stay in Holiday Inns, that I have real reasons for my knowledge that this is all a hoax, I am labeled as a denier!
"You wouldn't think that way if you didn't work for that big pharma company!" as if that make me wrong! The CEO of my company doesn't even know my name much less my opinions on Global Warming!
"Why don't you believe what the rest of your peers believe?" Because "believing" and scientific opinion are 2 separate concept. To understand "believing" ask your pastor, as for my professional opinion, show me the data.
the 21st century equivalent of the Piltdown Man.
Hey now! Stop stealin' my lines!
Hence, the inevitable conclusion: The world would be better off with all of us dead.
No problemo. Them first. I'll help.
Here is an eco-friendly riddle:
QUESTION: How did the eco-terrorist survive after
successfully murdering twelve people with a deadly
device that was securely attached to her body?
ANSWER: The deadly device was her womb.
Oops. Forgot. The unborn aren’t really human. (snark)
Next thing you know, there’ll be a score card with
variations in eternal benefits for the number of
humans the eco-bombers take out. Women who abort
will probably be disqualified.
That's for sure!
I’ve (stupidly) tried reasoning with some people who seriously advocate reducing the population by 90% — and even talk of infertility viruses. I always invite them to lead by example.
Someone’s been reading my posts. LOL!
From: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938440/posts?page=200#200
Organic is code for we are animals.
If we are animals, then we are not
accountable to our Creator. We are
but dust, expendable, selfish earth
abusers; nothing higher or possessing
dominion over the animals or what the
earth produces.
Justifies abortion.
Absolves guilt for murdering the innocent.
Another assault on humanity is through the villification
of the very things that give us life and a reason to live ...
... Food, Air, Babies, Creativity, Faith, etc.
bump.
Nationalized healthcare should be very helpful in this effort...
Modern totalitarianism is all about mass death - that being the core business of the State.
What I have never been able to understand is this...
1. I grew up shallow breathing gray, smoggy, toxic air in the San Fernando Valley circa 1960’s. It was when smog alerts really meant “don’t breathe”.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: Today the air is remarkably cleaner.
2. I remember when Lake Tahoe was a toxic stew. You could not see 12” below the surface.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: Tahoe is a crystal clear lake you can confidently drink from.
3. I remember when you could actually see and smell the exhaust from vehicles.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: Cars don’t stink anymore and emission particles are invisible.
SO WHY THEN... would the earth be getting
warmer from pollution that doesn’t exist anymore?
And why is the the fault of America?
4. I remember when the highways were adrift with garbage.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: Every highway in the U.S. has litter laws and cleanup detachments paid for by tax dollars.
5. I remember when news programs were unrated.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: As soon as TV news had to compete for ratings, the ugliness of graphic, selatious, gratuitous and depraved so called “news” took a foothold and has not let go.
6. I remember when smoking commercials could be found on TV. Then they discovered it caused cancer. Tobacco company’s were forbidden to show anyone smoking on TV, they were brought to trial, fined and forced to label the box to tell you that smoking is dangerous.
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE: While it is clearly the smoker who chooses risky behavior, people still smoke. Tobacco companies have endured illegal double jeopardy prosecutions for ... causing cancer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.