Dubbed "America's Most Scenic Highway" in 1967 by Parade Magazine, the Greenies and their hand-puppets in Albany want to keep the Adirondack Northway (I-87) that way, despite it being a major thoroughfare between the US and Canada. Why should they worry about a few (frozen) dead motorists when those dastardly cell-phone towers might ruin the scenery?
/sarc off
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Mr_Moonlight
Exactly. Who cares about a few freezing motorists? Keep the Throughway Green!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
12/16/2007 12:37:01 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Mr_Moonlight
The first new tower is being erected in North Hudson right now - fills in a whopping 10% of the “dead spot”
3 posted on
12/16/2007 12:38:50 PM PST by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: Mr_Moonlight
—so now everywhere in the country has to have cell phone service—????
4 posted on
12/16/2007 12:39:33 PM PST by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: Mr_Moonlight
I am ambivalent about the cellphone towers. Are we so helpless in the cell phone era that we can’t be expected to put emergency equipment in our cars when driving in rural areas the winter?
To: Mr_Moonlight
New Yorkers pay the highest taxes of any state (by far) for the most incompetent government of any state.
And Spitzer may be the worst governor in the US. He certainly is the craziest.
And don’t get me started on our senators, Clinton and Schumer..... Excuse me while my head explodes.
6 posted on
12/16/2007 12:41:10 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
I’ve driven around on various major roads (including I-87) in Westchester County and have noticed at least a couple of cell towers that look like trees.Why can’t they use these in the areas in question.
7 posted on
12/16/2007 12:41:36 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
I never leave home during the winter without adequate clothing to survive for extened periods without an external heat source no matter how far I’m driving. You can’t plan how far from help you’re going to be if you have an accident.
I don’t even have a cell phone.
Too bad the gentleman succumbed to hypothermia but sometimes you need to take responsibility for your own safety and not depend on the gubbmint. Especially when the gubbmint is run by socialists.
8 posted on
12/16/2007 12:45:14 PM PST by
43north
(I hope we are around long enough to become a layer in the rocks of the future.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
But Gov. Spitzer's office has essentially telegraphed its ambivalence about the project. After all, it argues, lots of Upstate highways have limited cell service.If this is true then I have to go with Da Spit on this one. Perfect World is just not ours to hold.
17 posted on
12/16/2007 12:59:39 PM PST by
decimon
To: Mr_Moonlight
basically to ensure they don't spoil the view. (Greenie-griping is a chief reason why service is so spotty up there in the first place.)
Around here, they disguise 'em as palm trees...
![](http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/1371175/2/istockphoto_1371175_cellphone_tower_disguised_as_a_palm_tree.jpg)
18 posted on
12/16/2007 12:59:48 PM PST by
ErnBatavia
(...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
To: Mr_Moonlight
As best I can recalll, the Donner Party had no cell phones and they made do way back before Global Warming. They even got a pass named for them
19 posted on
12/16/2007 1:00:24 PM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Oh the Humanity! No cell phone towers! I have none where I live, we deal with it by being prepared.....blankets, full tank of gas, several coats and a pair of overalls.....
Spare me.
20 posted on
12/16/2007 1:02:30 PM PST by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: Mr_Moonlight
There are towers that pretty closely resemble trees. There's one on RT. 2 in Harvard, Mass. (30 miles west of Boston, not the University.) The guy that did the survey for Verizon was a Harvard resident.
![](http://www.ag.auburn.edu/hort/landscape/images/DecSTGO_photo24.jpg)
23 posted on
12/16/2007 1:08:30 PM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
To: Mr_Moonlight
I’m with 43north, in #8, Moonlit. “sometimes you need to take responsibility for your own safety and not depend on the gubbmint.” Out in these sticks, cellphone-dependent tourists sometimes remind me of the perfectly-healthy Homer Simpson in the nursing home demanding to be fed, changed, and turned.
27 posted on
12/16/2007 1:14:51 PM PST by
flowerplough
("These go to eleven." -- Nigel Tufnel)
To: Mr_Moonlight
How much is J. Q. Public going to have to pay in the form of higher taxes or user fees so that everyone will be safe everywhere from everything?
As a side note, there is a cell tower on the northern shores of Lake Coeur d'Alene, highlighted against the sky, that has been made in the shape of a tree to conceal its true identity. Problem is, it is about three times the height of the surrounding trees.
As another side note (though certainly connected to the above), the only verbiage I would ever consider for a bumper sticker is "I hate sh*theads." It seems to cover all eventualities.
29 posted on
12/16/2007 1:21:59 PM PST by
RobinOfKingston
(Man, that's stupid...even by congressional standards.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Why should they worry about a few (frozen) dead motorists when those dastardly cell-phone towers might ruin the scenery?
Idiot Eliot Spitzer is pandering to the commies again. Good folks similar to those at the URL
here have been resolving this problem for years with cell towers that look like this;
![](http://waynesword.palomar.edu/images/faktr25b.jpg)
32 posted on
12/16/2007 1:26:05 PM PST by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
I live in Vermont, and it gets cold here.
We live in a cell free area, and can’t use a cell phone until we drive about five miles toward Montpelier. I don’t carry a cell phone anyway, I gave mine to one of my kids in college.
I make it a rule never to go out in my car without enough warm clothes and boots to survive a hike, if necessary. I should think that was also an obvious rule for upstate New York. You don’t have to wear all the stuff while you drive, but have it in the car.
34 posted on
12/16/2007 1:33:47 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Does service such as On Star work in this area?
39 posted on
12/16/2007 1:45:12 PM PST by
deport
(---17 days Iowa Caucuses--- 22 days New Hampshire vote s--- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
To: Mr_Moonlight
If your life depends on a cell phone connection...
Get a cell phone booster
![](http://wilsonelectronics.com/img/Products/small/811211.jpg)
To: Mr_Moonlight
To: Mr_Moonlight
I lived 43 miles from the nearest McDonalds in the north country before there was any device called a “cell phone”. The locals told me what to carry in a vehicle in case there was an accident in the winter. Flares. Coffee can. Matches. Lighters. Blankets. Water. Beans and a can opener. They said to use a flare to burn the spare tire, if need be.
The idea that because a technology exists, people will stop being reckless is just not realistic. People are going to die no matter how much you to try to prevent it.
44 posted on
12/16/2007 2:06:36 PM PST by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson