Skip to comments.
The new and improved gunship
Daily Tech ^
| 13 December 2007
| Brandon Hill
Posted on 12/14/2007 10:37:14 AM PST by Red6
Boeing progresses forward with the development of its airborne laser program
Boeing is working on a devastating new weapon which could strike fear into the eyes of all American enemies. The company is progressing at a rapid pace on its 12,000-pound airborne laser.
The Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL) was installed into a C-130H gunship and Boeing is on track to begin in-flight tests of the weapon next year. Ground targets will be neutralized via the ATL which is incorporated into a rotating turret on the C-130H's belly.
The ATL is seen as a precise, high-power weapon that will result in less civilian causalities on the battlefield. Due to the nature of the laser being used, targets can be destroyed or disabled with extremely low levels of collateral damage. Boeing claims that the ATL is thus capable of being used on traditional battlefields or in more treacherous urban fighting.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailytech.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ac130; boeing; gunship; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
My only question is-
"Does it have a slow roast power setting?"
1
posted on
12/14/2007 10:37:16 AM PST
by
Red6
To: Red6
Anyone know the power range of this light box?
To: Red6
Set lasers to evaporate......
3
posted on
12/14/2007 10:39:39 AM PST
by
stm
(Fred Thompson in 08!)
To: Red6
The San Jose Redevelopment Agency has put in an order for one of these for dealing with those pesky eminent domain nuts.
4
posted on
12/14/2007 10:41:00 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Red6
Can the phaser be far behind?
5
posted on
12/14/2007 10:42:41 AM PST
by
LIConFem
(Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
To: taxcontrol
Anyone know the power range of this light box? Earlier threads had some of that info.
6
posted on
12/14/2007 10:43:39 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(anti-razors are pro-life)
To: Red6
7
posted on
12/14/2007 10:44:57 AM PST
by
SIDENET
(Hubba Hubba...)
To: taxcontrol
They are suggesting 20 miles.
8
posted on
12/14/2007 10:48:06 AM PST
by
Durus
("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
To: Red6
My Advanced Tactical
"Laser"
9
posted on
12/14/2007 10:48:12 AM PST
by
Delta 21
( MKC USCG - ret)
To: Red6
Next step - throw lighter more powerful version onto a satellite and some pencil pusher with a trac-ball can punch your ticket while he munches on a cruller with a cup o’ joe.
10
posted on
12/14/2007 10:49:12 AM PST
by
Sax
To: Red6
To: Red6
How well does it operate in/through smoke, dust, rain, or clouds?
12
posted on
12/14/2007 10:51:26 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: Sax
Why would it have to be lighter?
13
posted on
12/14/2007 10:54:59 AM PST
by
MacDorcha
(We have been at war with this mindset since before the Socratic method was borne.)
To: Joiseydude
14
posted on
12/14/2007 10:56:03 AM PST
by
MacDorcha
(We have been at war with this mindset since before the Socratic method was borne.)
To: Durus
20 miles seems like a good range for close in missile defense. If this proves viable, I wonder how long before we see it deployed in other forms?
aboard ship for fleet protection?
on a tracked vehicle for brigade level or Army level protection against rockets / aircraft / artillery / mortars?
Boost the power / range by four or five times and you can deploy on a low orbit platform.
Interesting times in weapons development
To: taxcontrol
To: Red6
How long before the BATF uses this weapon against American gun owners? Maybe starting with innocent collectors of Curios and Relics? It is time to put the 2nd Amendment FIRST.
17
posted on
12/14/2007 11:08:19 AM PST
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: Red6; Red Badger
Man this would be a cool light show when they fly over the range at night...
18
posted on
12/14/2007 11:10:32 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
Depending on the wavelength being used, It might be invisible........
19
posted on
12/14/2007 11:16:14 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: 2harddrive
"How long before the BATF uses this weapon against American gun owners? Maybe starting with innocent collectors of Curios and Relics? It is time to put the 2nd Amendment FIRST."Wait...
WHAT???
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson