Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The new and improved gunship
Daily Tech ^ | 13 December 2007 | Brandon Hill

Posted on 12/14/2007 10:37:14 AM PST by Red6

Boeing progresses forward with the development of its airborne laser program

Boeing is working on a devastating new weapon which could strike fear into the eyes of all American enemies. The company is progressing at a rapid pace on its 12,000-pound airborne laser.

The Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL) was installed into a C-130H gunship and Boeing is on track to begin in-flight tests of the weapon next year. Ground targets will be neutralized via the ATL which is incorporated into a rotating turret on the C-130H's belly.

The ATL is seen as a precise, high-power weapon that will result in less civilian causalities on the battlefield. Due to the nature of the laser being used, targets can be destroyed or disabled with extremely low levels of collateral damage. Boeing claims that the ATL is thus capable of being used on traditional battlefields or in more treacherous urban fighting.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailytech.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ac130; boeing; gunship; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
My only question is-

"Does it have a slow roast power setting?"

1 posted on 12/14/2007 10:37:16 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red6

Anyone know the power range of this light box?


2 posted on 12/14/2007 10:38:59 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
Set lasers to evaporate......
3 posted on 12/14/2007 10:39:39 AM PST by stm (Fred Thompson in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

The San Jose Redevelopment Agency has put in an order for one of these for dealing with those pesky eminent domain nuts.


4 posted on 12/14/2007 10:41:00 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
Can the phaser be far behind?
5 posted on 12/14/2007 10:42:41 AM PST by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Anyone know the power range of this light box?

Earlier threads had some of that info.

6 posted on 12/14/2007 10:43:39 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red6

That beeber is HUGH.


7 posted on 12/14/2007 10:44:57 AM PST by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

They are suggesting 20 miles.


8 posted on 12/14/2007 10:48:06 AM PST by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red6
My Advanced Tactical "Laser"

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

9 posted on 12/14/2007 10:48:12 AM PST by Delta 21 ( MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Next step - throw lighter more powerful version onto a satellite and some pencil pusher with a trac-ball can punch your ticket while he munches on a cruller with a cup o’ joe.


10 posted on 12/14/2007 10:49:12 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

1 megawatt


11 posted on 12/14/2007 10:50:23 AM PST by Joiseydude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

How well does it operate in/through smoke, dust, rain, or clouds?


12 posted on 12/14/2007 10:51:26 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

Why would it have to be lighter?


13 posted on 12/14/2007 10:54:59 AM PST by MacDorcha (We have been at war with this mindset since before the Socratic method was borne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

1 Jiggawatt you say?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfODSPIYwpQ


14 posted on 12/14/2007 10:56:03 AM PST by MacDorcha (We have been at war with this mindset since before the Socratic method was borne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Durus
20 miles seems like a good range for close in missile defense. If this proves viable, I wonder how long before we see it deployed in other forms?

aboard ship for fleet protection?

on a tracked vehicle for brigade level or Army level protection against rockets / aircraft / artillery / mortars?

Boost the power / range by four or five times and you can deploy on a low orbit platform.

Interesting times in weapons development

15 posted on 12/14/2007 10:56:23 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/atl.htm


16 posted on 12/14/2007 11:03:58 AM PST by Joiseydude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red6

How long before the BATF uses this weapon against American gun owners? Maybe starting with innocent collectors of Curios and Relics? It is time to put the 2nd Amendment FIRST.


17 posted on 12/14/2007 11:08:19 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6; Red Badger
Man this would be a cool light show when they fly over the range at night...


18 posted on 12/14/2007 11:10:32 AM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Depending on the wavelength being used, It might be invisible........


19 posted on 12/14/2007 11:16:14 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
"How long before the BATF uses this weapon against American gun owners? Maybe starting with innocent collectors of Curios and Relics? It is time to put the 2nd Amendment FIRST."

Wait...

WHAT???

20 posted on 12/14/2007 11:17:39 AM PST by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson